"Reclaiming Control" Patient Acceptance and Adherence to HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis Following Sexual Assault.

IF 2.2 Q1 NURSING
Global Qualitative Nursing Research Pub Date : 2021-11-03 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23333936211046581
Jessica E Draughon Moret, Daniel J Sheridan, Jennifer A Wenzel
{"title":"\"Reclaiming Control\" Patient Acceptance and Adherence to HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis Following Sexual Assault.","authors":"Jessica E Draughon Moret,&nbsp;Daniel J Sheridan,&nbsp;Jennifer A Wenzel","doi":"10.1177/23333936211046581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sexual assault is an irrefutable trauma; an insult to the autonomy of the person forced into sexual acts. Sexual assault sequelae range from physical injury and acute traumatic stress, to pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). HIV post-exposure prophylaxis (HIV PEP) following sexual assault may decrease the likelihood of HIV transmission. Many patients seeking healthcare post-sexual assault either do not initiate HIV PEP or do not complete the 28-day medication regimen. In this qualitative interpretive description, we interviewed sexual assault patients (<i>N</i>=11) about HIV PEP discussions/reactions, attitudes and understanding related to HIV and PEP, and barriers and facilitators of HIV PEP acceptance and adherence. Participants described a process of losing and reclaiming control throughout post-assault care and follow-up; and how this affected HIV PEP-related decision-making. Most HIV PEP decisions were described as a process of reclaiming control over one outcome while simultaneously losing control of another.</p>","PeriodicalId":45940,"journal":{"name":"Global Qualitative Nursing Research","volume":"8 ","pages":"23333936211046581"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6b/8b/10.1177_23333936211046581.PMC8851138.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Qualitative Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23333936211046581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Sexual assault is an irrefutable trauma; an insult to the autonomy of the person forced into sexual acts. Sexual assault sequelae range from physical injury and acute traumatic stress, to pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). HIV post-exposure prophylaxis (HIV PEP) following sexual assault may decrease the likelihood of HIV transmission. Many patients seeking healthcare post-sexual assault either do not initiate HIV PEP or do not complete the 28-day medication regimen. In this qualitative interpretive description, we interviewed sexual assault patients (N=11) about HIV PEP discussions/reactions, attitudes and understanding related to HIV and PEP, and barriers and facilitators of HIV PEP acceptance and adherence. Participants described a process of losing and reclaiming control throughout post-assault care and follow-up; and how this affected HIV PEP-related decision-making. Most HIV PEP decisions were described as a process of reclaiming control over one outcome while simultaneously losing control of another.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

“收回控制”性侵犯后患者接受和坚持艾滋病毒暴露后预防。
性侵犯是一种无可辩驳的创伤;对被迫进行性行为的人的自主权的侮辱。性侵犯的后遗症包括身体伤害和急性创伤压力,怀孕和性传播感染,包括人类免疫缺陷病毒(艾滋病毒)。性侵犯后的HIV暴露后预防(HIV PEP)可能会降低HIV传播的可能性。许多性侵犯后寻求医疗保健的患者要么没有开始艾滋病毒PEP,要么没有完成28天的药物治疗方案。在这一定性解释性描述中,我们采访了性侵犯患者(N=11)关于HIV PEP的讨论/反应,与HIV和PEP相关的态度和理解,以及HIV PEP接受和遵守的障碍和促进因素。参与者描述了在袭击后的护理和随访中失去和恢复控制的过程;以及这如何影响与艾滋病毒pep相关的决策。大多数艾滋病毒PEP决定被描述为重新控制一种结果的过程,同时失去对另一种结果的控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
41
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Qualitative Nursing Research (GQNR) is a ground breaking, international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on qualitative research in fields relevant to nursing and other health professionals world-wide. The journal specializes in topics related to nursing practice, responses to health and illness, health promotion, and health care delivery. GQNR will publish research articles using qualitative methods and qualitatively-driven mixed-method designs as well as meta-syntheses and articles focused on methodological development. Special sections include Ethics, Methodological Development, Advancing Theory/Metasynthesis, Establishing Evidence, and Application to Practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信