Impact of Pharmacist Involvement on the Utility of a Gram-Negative Blood Culture Identification Panel on Antimicrobial Usage.

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Journal of Pharmacy Technology Pub Date : 2021-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-18 DOI:10.1177/87551225211046627
Caitlin Bowman, Melissa Holloway, Lisa Scott, Carmen Russell, Sonia Lott, Raid Amin
{"title":"Impact of Pharmacist Involvement on the Utility of a Gram-Negative Blood Culture Identification Panel on Antimicrobial Usage.","authors":"Caitlin Bowman,&nbsp;Melissa Holloway,&nbsp;Lisa Scott,&nbsp;Carmen Russell,&nbsp;Sonia Lott,&nbsp;Raid Amin","doi":"10.1177/87551225211046627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> A rapid molecular diagnostic test (MDT) is a test used to identify several different species of gram-negative bacteria and their genetic resistance markers. However, the impact of rapid MDT has not been established when combined with pharmacist involvement. <b>Objective:</b> To determine the impact of pharmacy involvement on patient outcomes when using rapid MDT. The primary outcome is the time from gram stain result to the first dose of the targeted antibiotic. <b>Methods:</b> This is a single-center, quasi-experimental, 1-group pretest-posttest design study of patients with gram-negative bacteremia in a community hospital. Hospitalized patients 18 years or older were included if they had a gram-negative blood culture. Patients were excluded if they were discharged or expired prior to culture results. Outcomes were compared between patients prior to and after implementation of the automated MDT. This research was determined to be exempt from institutional review board oversight consistent with West Florida Healthcare and in accordance with institutional policy. <b>Results:</b> The use of rapid MDT combined with pharmacist intervention resulted in a statistically significant decrease in the time to targeted antibiotic therapy (pre-intervention group, n = 77, 44.8 ± 17.8 hours versus post-intervention group, n= 80, 4.4 ± 5.8 hours; <i>P</i> ≤.001). There was no significant difference found between secondary outcomes. Limitations included small sample size as well as inconsistent documentation. <b>Conclusions:</b> The use of rapid MDT combined with pharmacist intervention resulted in a statistically significant decrease in the time to targeted antibiotic therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":"37 6","pages":"304-309"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8592237/pdf/10.1177_87551225211046627.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225211046627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: A rapid molecular diagnostic test (MDT) is a test used to identify several different species of gram-negative bacteria and their genetic resistance markers. However, the impact of rapid MDT has not been established when combined with pharmacist involvement. Objective: To determine the impact of pharmacy involvement on patient outcomes when using rapid MDT. The primary outcome is the time from gram stain result to the first dose of the targeted antibiotic. Methods: This is a single-center, quasi-experimental, 1-group pretest-posttest design study of patients with gram-negative bacteremia in a community hospital. Hospitalized patients 18 years or older were included if they had a gram-negative blood culture. Patients were excluded if they were discharged or expired prior to culture results. Outcomes were compared between patients prior to and after implementation of the automated MDT. This research was determined to be exempt from institutional review board oversight consistent with West Florida Healthcare and in accordance with institutional policy. Results: The use of rapid MDT combined with pharmacist intervention resulted in a statistically significant decrease in the time to targeted antibiotic therapy (pre-intervention group, n = 77, 44.8 ± 17.8 hours versus post-intervention group, n= 80, 4.4 ± 5.8 hours; P ≤.001). There was no significant difference found between secondary outcomes. Limitations included small sample size as well as inconsistent documentation. Conclusions: The use of rapid MDT combined with pharmacist intervention resulted in a statistically significant decrease in the time to targeted antibiotic therapy.

药师参与对革兰氏阴性血培养鉴定小组对抗菌药物使用的影响。
背景:快速分子诊断试验(MDT)是一种用于鉴定几种不同种类的革兰氏阴性菌及其遗传抗性标记的试验。然而,当与药剂师的参与相结合时,快速MDT的影响尚未确定。目的:探讨快速MDT时药学介入对患者预后的影响。主要结果是从革兰氏染色结果到第一次靶向抗生素剂量的时间。方法:这是一项针对某社区医院革兰氏阴性菌血症患者的单中心、准实验、1组前测后测设计研究。18岁或以上的住院患者,如果他们的革兰氏阴性血培养也包括在内。如果患者在培养结果之前出院或死亡,则排除。比较患者在实施自动化MDT之前和之后的结果。根据机构政策,本研究确定不受机构审查委员会监督,与西佛罗里达医疗保健一致。结果:快速MDT联合药师干预可显著缩短患者获得靶向抗生素治疗的时间(干预前组,n= 77, 44.8±17.8 h;干预后组,n= 80, 4.4±5.8 h;P≤措施)。次要结果间无显著差异。局限性包括样本量小以及文件不一致。结论:快速MDT联合药师干预可显著缩短靶向抗生素治疗时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Technology
Journal of Pharmacy Technology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: For both pharmacists and technicians, jPT provides valuable information for those interested in the entire body of pharmacy practice. jPT covers new drugs, products, and equipment; therapeutic trends; organizational, legal, and educational activities; drug distribution and administration; and includes continuing education articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信