How is the Behavior Change Technique Content of the NHS Diabetes Prevention Program Understood by Participants? A Qualitative Study of Fidelity, With a Focus on Receipt.

Lisa M Miles, Rhiannon E Hawkes, David P French
{"title":"How is the Behavior Change Technique Content of the NHS Diabetes Prevention Program Understood by Participants? A Qualitative Study of Fidelity, With a Focus on Receipt.","authors":"Lisa M Miles,&nbsp;Rhiannon E Hawkes,&nbsp;David P French","doi":"10.1093/abm/kaab093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The National Health Service (NHS) Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) is a nationally implemented behavioral intervention for adults at high risk of developing Type 2 diabetes in England, based on a program specification that stipulates inclusion of 19 specific behavior change techniques (BCTs). Previous work has identified drift in fidelity from these NHS England specifications through providers' program manuals, training, and delivery, especially in relation to BCTs targeting self-regulatory processes.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This qualitative study investigates intervention receipt, i.e., how the self-regulatory BCT content of the NHS-DPP is understood by participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty participants from eight NHS-DPP locations were interviewed; topics included participants' understanding of self-monitoring of behavior, goal setting, feedback, problem solving, and action planning. Transcripts were analyzed thematically using the framework method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a wide variation in understanding among participants for some BCTs, as well as between BCTs. Participants described their understanding of \"self-monitoring of behaviors\" with ease and valued BCTs focused on outcomes (weight loss). Some participants learned how to set appropriate behavioral goals. Participants struggled to recall \"action planning\" or \"problem solving\" or found these techniques challenging to understand, unless additional support was provided (e.g., through group discussion).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants' lack of understanding of some self-regulatory BCTs is consistent with the drift across fidelity domains previously identified from NHS design specifications. Behavioral interventions should build-in necessary support for participants to help them understand some BCTs such as action planning and problem solving. Alternatively, these self-regulatory BCTs may be intrinsically difficult to use for this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":520558,"journal":{"name":"Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"749-759"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/91/6c/kaab093.PMC9274983.pdf","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaab093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Background: The National Health Service (NHS) Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) is a nationally implemented behavioral intervention for adults at high risk of developing Type 2 diabetes in England, based on a program specification that stipulates inclusion of 19 specific behavior change techniques (BCTs). Previous work has identified drift in fidelity from these NHS England specifications through providers' program manuals, training, and delivery, especially in relation to BCTs targeting self-regulatory processes.

Purpose: This qualitative study investigates intervention receipt, i.e., how the self-regulatory BCT content of the NHS-DPP is understood by participants.

Methods: Twenty participants from eight NHS-DPP locations were interviewed; topics included participants' understanding of self-monitoring of behavior, goal setting, feedback, problem solving, and action planning. Transcripts were analyzed thematically using the framework method.

Results: There was a wide variation in understanding among participants for some BCTs, as well as between BCTs. Participants described their understanding of "self-monitoring of behaviors" with ease and valued BCTs focused on outcomes (weight loss). Some participants learned how to set appropriate behavioral goals. Participants struggled to recall "action planning" or "problem solving" or found these techniques challenging to understand, unless additional support was provided (e.g., through group discussion).

Conclusions: Participants' lack of understanding of some self-regulatory BCTs is consistent with the drift across fidelity domains previously identified from NHS design specifications. Behavioral interventions should build-in necessary support for participants to help them understand some BCTs such as action planning and problem solving. Alternatively, these self-regulatory BCTs may be intrinsically difficult to use for this population.

参与者如何理解NHS糖尿病预防项目的行为改变技术内容?保真度的定性研究,以接收为重点。
背景:英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)糖尿病预防计划(DPP)是一项针对英国2型糖尿病高危人群的全国性行为干预,该计划规范规定包括19种特定的行为改变技术(bct)。先前的工作已经确定,通过供应商的程序手册、培训和交付,特别是与bct相关的自我监管过程,这些NHS英格兰规范的保真度有所下降。目的:本定性研究旨在调查干预接受情况,即参与者如何理解NHS-DPP的自我调节BCT内容。方法:对来自8个NHS-DPP地点的20名参与者进行访谈;主题包括参与者对自我行为监控、目标设定、反馈、问题解决和行动计划的理解。采用框架法对转录本进行主题分析。结果:参与者之间对某些bct的理解存在很大差异,bct之间也是如此。参与者轻松地描述了他们对“行为自我监控”的理解,并重视注重结果(减肥)的btc。一些参与者学会了如何设定适当的行为目标。参与者很难回忆起“行动计划”或“解决问题”,或者发现这些技术很难理解,除非提供额外的支持(例如,通过小组讨论)。结论:参与者缺乏对一些自我调节的bct的理解,这与之前从NHS设计规范中确定的保真度域的漂移是一致的。行为干预应为参与者提供必要的支持,帮助他们理解一些BCTs,如行动计划和问题解决。另外,这些自我调节的bct可能在本质上难以用于这一人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信