Survey on Availability of Domiciliary Dental Care under 16-km Rule.

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College Pub Date : 2022-03-08 Epub Date: 2022-02-15 DOI:10.2209/tdcpublication.2021-0016
Munetsugu Tashiro, SoIchiro Hirata, Kousuke Oozawa, Tetsunori Ozaki
{"title":"Survey on Availability of Domiciliary Dental Care under 16-km Rule.","authors":"Munetsugu Tashiro,&nbsp;SoIchiro Hirata,&nbsp;Kousuke Oozawa,&nbsp;Tetsunori Ozaki","doi":"10.2209/tdcpublication.2021-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Japan, domiciliary care fees are only covered by the public health insurance system if the clinic concerned is located within 16 km of the patient's residence. This nationwide rule does not take local conditions into account and therefore may not be appropriate. The goal of the present study was to assess the current state of domiciliary dental care nationwide in view of this restriction to clarify the current situation and any inherent problems. Six dental institutions providing domiciliary dental care were selected by location (urban or mountainous area) and size. Travel time from clinics to the 16 km points and the longest time required for the journey from clinics were investigated. Two of the dental clinics were located in depopulated areas with few dental institutions. These clinics had to provide domiciliary dental care not only in the 16-km area around the clinic, but also in areas over 16 km away. Travel time to the 16-km points was between 52 and 90 min. On the other hand, the longest time for actual visiting was between 30 and 60 min. In some areas, no domiciliary dental care was available within the 16 km limit. This indicates that the 16-km area is too wide to be covered by one dental institution alone and that it poses a problem in areas with few dental institutions. This suggests that it would be preferable to consider time required to visit rather than geographical distance in forming policy. The 16-km limit often spans multiple residential areas, indicating that greater coordination is needed between the Community-based Integrated Care System and dental offices.</p>","PeriodicalId":45490,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College","volume":"63 1","pages":"41-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2209/tdcpublication.2021-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Japan, domiciliary care fees are only covered by the public health insurance system if the clinic concerned is located within 16 km of the patient's residence. This nationwide rule does not take local conditions into account and therefore may not be appropriate. The goal of the present study was to assess the current state of domiciliary dental care nationwide in view of this restriction to clarify the current situation and any inherent problems. Six dental institutions providing domiciliary dental care were selected by location (urban or mountainous area) and size. Travel time from clinics to the 16 km points and the longest time required for the journey from clinics were investigated. Two of the dental clinics were located in depopulated areas with few dental institutions. These clinics had to provide domiciliary dental care not only in the 16-km area around the clinic, but also in areas over 16 km away. Travel time to the 16-km points was between 52 and 90 min. On the other hand, the longest time for actual visiting was between 30 and 60 min. In some areas, no domiciliary dental care was available within the 16 km limit. This indicates that the 16-km area is too wide to be covered by one dental institution alone and that it poses a problem in areas with few dental institutions. This suggests that it would be preferable to consider time required to visit rather than geographical distance in forming policy. The 16-km limit often spans multiple residential areas, indicating that greater coordination is needed between the Community-based Integrated Care System and dental offices.

在16公里规则下的住所牙科护理的可得性调查。
在日本,只有当有关诊所位于患者住所16公里以内时,住家护理费用才由公共健康保险系统支付。这个全国性的规定没有考虑到当地的情况,因此可能不合适。本研究的目的是评估目前国内的家庭牙科护理鉴于这一限制,以澄清目前的情况和任何固有的问题。根据地点(城市或山区)和规模选择了六家提供居家牙科保健的牙科机构。调查了从诊所到16公里点的旅行时间和从诊所到目的地所需的最长时间。其中两家牙科诊所位于人口稀少、牙科机构很少的地区。这些诊所不仅要在诊所周围16公里范围内,而且还要在16公里以外的地区提供上门牙科护理。前往16公里范围点的旅行时间在52至90分钟之间。另一方面,实际就诊的最长时间在30至60分钟之间。在一些地区,16公里范围内没有住家牙科护理。这表明,16公里的区域太宽,无法由一家牙科机构单独覆盖,并且在牙科机构很少的地区造成了问题。这表明,在制定政策时最好考虑访问所需的时间,而不是考虑地理距离。16公里的限制通常跨越多个居民区,这表明社区综合护理系统和牙科诊所之间需要加强协调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College
Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The bulletin of Tokyo Dental collegue is principally for the publication of original contributions to multidisciplinary research in dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信