Ancestral Background Is Underreported in Regenerative Engineering.

IF 1.9 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Holly Ryan, Daniel Bister, Sophia A Holliday, Jessica Boehlein, Aljae Lewis, Justin Silberman, Josephine B Allen, Erika Moore
{"title":"Ancestral Background Is Underreported in Regenerative Engineering.","authors":"Holly Ryan,&nbsp;Daniel Bister,&nbsp;Sophia A Holliday,&nbsp;Jessica Boehlein,&nbsp;Aljae Lewis,&nbsp;Justin Silberman,&nbsp;Josephine B Allen,&nbsp;Erika Moore","doi":"10.1007/s40883-021-00237-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The ancestral background of human cells may play a role in cells' behavior and response to therapeutic interventions in vitro. We investigate the prevalence of ancestry reporting in current biological research and suggest that increased reporting would be beneficial to the field.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Articles published over a six-month period in ten different journals were reviewed for their use of human primary cells and immortalized cell lines, and were analyzed based on whether or not the ancestral or ethnic information of cell donors was ascertainable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The vast majority of literature published in the journals and timeframe we investigated did not report on the ancestral or ethnic origins of the human cells used.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is currently a substantial lack of reporting on the ancestral background of human cells used for research. We suggest that increased ancestral reporting should be implemented in order to improve the development of precision medicine.</p><p><strong>Lay summary: </strong>Many diseases affect patients of different ancestral backgrounds in a variety of ways. In this perspective article, we raise the concern that, since many scientists do not consider ancestry when designing their studies, their results may not apply to all patients. We use data to show that very few scientists report on the ancestry of the donors who contribute cells and tissues to their research. We suggest that broader reporting on donor ancestry would improve biomedical research and would help doctors to personalize treatments for their patients.Future work includes further increasing awareness of the importance of including ancestry as a variable in experimental design, as well as promoting increased reporting on ancestry in the research community.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40883-021-00237-8.</p>","PeriodicalId":20936,"journal":{"name":"Regenerative Engineering and Translational Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"499-503"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8577639/pdf/","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regenerative Engineering and Translational Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40883-021-00237-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Purpose: The ancestral background of human cells may play a role in cells' behavior and response to therapeutic interventions in vitro. We investigate the prevalence of ancestry reporting in current biological research and suggest that increased reporting would be beneficial to the field.

Methods: Articles published over a six-month period in ten different journals were reviewed for their use of human primary cells and immortalized cell lines, and were analyzed based on whether or not the ancestral or ethnic information of cell donors was ascertainable.

Results: The vast majority of literature published in the journals and timeframe we investigated did not report on the ancestral or ethnic origins of the human cells used.

Conclusion: There is currently a substantial lack of reporting on the ancestral background of human cells used for research. We suggest that increased ancestral reporting should be implemented in order to improve the development of precision medicine.

Lay summary: Many diseases affect patients of different ancestral backgrounds in a variety of ways. In this perspective article, we raise the concern that, since many scientists do not consider ancestry when designing their studies, their results may not apply to all patients. We use data to show that very few scientists report on the ancestry of the donors who contribute cells and tissues to their research. We suggest that broader reporting on donor ancestry would improve biomedical research and would help doctors to personalize treatments for their patients.Future work includes further increasing awareness of the importance of including ancestry as a variable in experimental design, as well as promoting increased reporting on ancestry in the research community.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40883-021-00237-8.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

祖先背景在再生工程中被低估。
目的:人类细胞的祖先背景可能在细胞对体外治疗干预的行为和反应中起作用。我们调查了当前生物学研究中祖先报告的流行程度,并建议增加报告将有利于该领域。方法:对发表在10种不同期刊上6个月以上的有关人类原代细胞和永生化细胞系的文章进行综述,并根据是否确定细胞供体的祖先或种族信息进行分析。结果:在我们调查的期刊和时间框架上发表的绝大多数文献都没有报道所使用的人类细胞的祖先或种族起源。结论:目前关于用于研究的人类细胞的祖先背景的报道相当缺乏。我们建议增加祖先报告,以促进精准医学的发展。概要:许多疾病以各种方式影响不同祖先背景的患者。在这篇前瞻性文章中,我们提出了这样的担忧,即由于许多科学家在设计研究时不考虑祖先,他们的结果可能不适用于所有患者。我们用数据表明,很少有科学家报告为他们的研究提供细胞和组织的捐赠者的祖先。我们认为,更广泛地报道供体祖先将改善生物医学研究,并有助于医生为患者提供个性化治疗。未来的工作包括进一步提高人们对将祖先作为实验设计变量的重要性的认识,以及促进研究界增加对祖先的报道。补充资料:在线版本提供补充资料,网址为10.1007/s40883-021-00237-8。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.50%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Regenerative Engineering is an international journal covering convergence of the disciplines of tissue engineering, advanced materials science, stem cell research, the physical sciences, and areas of developmental biology. This convergence brings exciting opportunities to translate bench-top research into bedside methods, allowing the possibility of moving beyond maintaining or repairing tissues to regenerating them. The journal encourages both top-down engineering approaches and bottom-up strategies integrating materials science with stem cell research and developmental biology. Convergence papers on instructive biomaterials, stimuli-responsive biomaterials, micro- and nano-patterning for regenerative engineering, elastomeric biomaterials, hydrogels for tissue engineering, and rapid prototyping and bioprinting approaches are particularly welcome. The journal provides a premier, single-blind peer-reviewed forum for the publication of original papers, authoritative reviews, rapid communications, news and views, and opinion papers addressing the most important issues and efforts toward successfully regenerating complex human tissues and organs. All research articles feature a lay abstract highlighting the relevance and future impact for patients, government and other health officials, and members of the general public. Bridging the gap between the lab and the clinic, the journal also serves as a dedicated platform for showcasing translational research that brings basic scientific research and discoveries into clinical methods and therapies, contributing to the improvement of human health care. Topics covered in Regenerative Engineering and Translational Medicine include: Advanced materials science for regenerative and biomedical applicationsStem cells for tissue regenerationDrug delivery for tissue regenerationNanomaterials and nanobiotechnology for tissue regenerationStudies combining tissue engineering/regeneration with developmental biologyConvergence research in pre-clinical and clinical phases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信