Disjunction in the subjective and objective measurement of co-occurring depression in borderline personality disorder - Implications for diagnosis.

Lukas Cheney, Jillian H Broadbear, Sathya Rao
{"title":"Disjunction in the subjective and objective measurement of co-occurring depression in borderline personality disorder - Implications for diagnosis.","authors":"Lukas Cheney,&nbsp;Jillian H Broadbear,&nbsp;Sathya Rao","doi":"10.1177/10398562211065296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Research and clinical experience suggest that people with borderline personality disorder (BPD) are more likely to report greater severity of depressive symptoms than is objectively measured by their clinician. The prominence of low mood in association with BPD can result in the treatment of depressive symptoms being prioritised over the diagnosis and treatment of BPD.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study investigated the utility of validated clinician-administered and self-report depression rating scales during psychiatric assessment of 49 clients diagnosed with BPD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Considerable discrepancies emerged between client and clinician ratings of depression, with client-rated scales generating significantly higher depression scores. Both client-rated and clinician-rated depression scores were positively influenced by the severity of BPD symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings raise questions about the interpretation of rating scales in clinical decision-making and highlight inherent uncertainty when diagnosing major depressive disorder in people who have borderline personality disorder. The accurate diagnosis of low mood has significant implications for the treatment and management of both disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":347122,"journal":{"name":"Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists","volume":" ","pages":"481-485"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10398562211065296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Research and clinical experience suggest that people with borderline personality disorder (BPD) are more likely to report greater severity of depressive symptoms than is objectively measured by their clinician. The prominence of low mood in association with BPD can result in the treatment of depressive symptoms being prioritised over the diagnosis and treatment of BPD.

Method: This study investigated the utility of validated clinician-administered and self-report depression rating scales during psychiatric assessment of 49 clients diagnosed with BPD.

Results: Considerable discrepancies emerged between client and clinician ratings of depression, with client-rated scales generating significantly higher depression scores. Both client-rated and clinician-rated depression scores were positively influenced by the severity of BPD symptoms.

Conclusions: These findings raise questions about the interpretation of rating scales in clinical decision-making and highlight inherent uncertainty when diagnosing major depressive disorder in people who have borderline personality disorder. The accurate diagnosis of low mood has significant implications for the treatment and management of both disorders.

边缘型人格障碍伴发抑郁的主客观测量中的分离——诊断意义。
目的:研究和临床经验表明,边缘型人格障碍(BPD)患者更有可能报告比他们的临床医生客观测量更严重的抑郁症状。与BPD相关的显著情绪低落可能导致抑郁症状的治疗优先于BPD的诊断和治疗。方法:本研究对49名诊断为BPD的患者进行了心理评估,调查了经临床验证的抑郁评定量表和自我报告抑郁评定量表的效用。结果:在病人和临床医生对抑郁症的评分之间出现了相当大的差异,病人评分的量表产生了明显更高的抑郁评分。病人评分和医生评分的抑郁评分都受到BPD症状严重程度的积极影响。结论:这些发现对评定量表在临床决策中的解释提出了疑问,并突出了在诊断边缘型人格障碍患者的重度抑郁症时固有的不确定性。低情绪的准确诊断对这两种疾病的治疗和管理具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信