Efficacy and safety of rhBMP/β-TCP in alveolar ridge preservation: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, comparative, investigator-blinded clinical trial.

IF 2 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Jeong Joon Han, Ah Ryum Chang, Jaemyung Ahn, Seunggon Jung, Jongrak Hong, Hee-Kyun Oh, Soon Jung Hwang
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of rhBMP/β-TCP in alveolar ridge preservation: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, comparative, investigator-blinded clinical trial.","authors":"Jeong Joon Han,&nbsp;Ah Ryum Chang,&nbsp;Jaemyung Ahn,&nbsp;Seunggon Jung,&nbsp;Jongrak Hong,&nbsp;Hee-Kyun Oh,&nbsp;Soon Jung Hwang","doi":"10.1186/s40902-021-00328-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this multicenter, randomized, open-label, comparative, investigator-blinded study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 (rhBMP-2) combined with β-TCP (rhBMP-2/β-TCP) in alveolar ridge preservation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eighty-four subjects from three centers were enrolled in this clinical trial. After tooth extraction, rhBMP-2/β-TCP (n = 41, test group) or β-TCP (n = 43, control group) were grafted to the extraction socket with an absorbable barrier membrane for alveolar ridge preservation. Using computed tomography images obtained immediately after and 12 weeks after surgery, changes in the alveolar bone height and width were analyzed for each group and compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both the test and control groups showed a significant decrease in alveolar bone height in the 12 weeks after surgery (both groups, p < 0.0001). However, the test group exhibited a significantly lower decrease in alveolar bone height than the control group (p = 0.0004). Alveolar bone width also showed significantly less resorption in the test group than in the control group for all extraction socket levels (ESL) (p = 0.0152 for 75% ESL; p < 0.0001 for 50% ESL; p < 0.0001 for 25% ESL). There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups. No severe adverse events occurred in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study suggest that rhBMP-2/β-TCP is a safe graft material that provides a high alveolar bone preservation effect in patients receiving dental extraction.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov , NCT02714829 , Registered 22 March 2016.</p>","PeriodicalId":18357,"journal":{"name":"Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"43 1","pages":"42"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8688599/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-021-00328-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: The aim of this multicenter, randomized, open-label, comparative, investigator-blinded study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 (rhBMP-2) combined with β-TCP (rhBMP-2/β-TCP) in alveolar ridge preservation.

Materials and methods: Eighty-four subjects from three centers were enrolled in this clinical trial. After tooth extraction, rhBMP-2/β-TCP (n = 41, test group) or β-TCP (n = 43, control group) were grafted to the extraction socket with an absorbable barrier membrane for alveolar ridge preservation. Using computed tomography images obtained immediately after and 12 weeks after surgery, changes in the alveolar bone height and width were analyzed for each group and compared between the two groups.

Results: Both the test and control groups showed a significant decrease in alveolar bone height in the 12 weeks after surgery (both groups, p < 0.0001). However, the test group exhibited a significantly lower decrease in alveolar bone height than the control group (p = 0.0004). Alveolar bone width also showed significantly less resorption in the test group than in the control group for all extraction socket levels (ESL) (p = 0.0152 for 75% ESL; p < 0.0001 for 50% ESL; p < 0.0001 for 25% ESL). There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups. No severe adverse events occurred in either group.

Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that rhBMP-2/β-TCP is a safe graft material that provides a high alveolar bone preservation effect in patients receiving dental extraction.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov , NCT02714829 , Registered 22 March 2016.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

rhBMP/β-TCP在牙槽嵴保存中的有效性和安全性:一项多中心、随机、开放标签、比较、研究者盲法临床试验
背景:这项多中心、随机、开放标签、比较、研究者盲法研究的目的是探讨重组人骨形态发生蛋白2 (rhBMP-2)联合β-TCP (rhBMP-2/β-TCP)保存牙槽嵴的有效性和安全性。材料与方法:本临床试验纳入来自三个中心的84名受试者。拔牙后,将rhBMP-2/β-TCP (n = 41,试验组)或β-TCP (n = 43,对照组)用可吸收屏障膜移植于拔牙槽内保存牙槽嵴。利用术后即刻和术后12周的计算机断层图像,分析各组牙槽骨高度和宽度的变化,并比较两组间的差异。结果:实验组和对照组术后12周牙槽骨高度均明显降低(p < 0.0001)。而实验组的牙槽骨高度下降幅度明显低于对照组(p = 0.0004)。在所有拔牙槽位水平(ESL)下,实验组的牙槽骨宽度吸收也明显低于对照组(75% ESL) (p = 0.0152;50% ESL的p < 0.0001;25% ESL的p < 0.0001)。两组患者不良事件发生率差异无统计学意义。两组均未发生严重不良事件。结论:rhBMP-2/β-TCP是一种安全的移植材料,在拔牙患者中具有较高的牙槽骨保存效果。试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02714829,注册于2016年3月22日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信