Identifying Neurobiological Underpinnings of Two Suicidal Subtypes.

Journal of psychiatry and brain science Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-08-31 DOI:10.20900/jpbs.20210016
Barbara Stanley, Liat Itzhaky, Maria A Oquendo
{"title":"Identifying Neurobiological Underpinnings of Two Suicidal Subtypes.","authors":"Barbara Stanley,&nbsp;Liat Itzhaky,&nbsp;Maria A Oquendo","doi":"10.20900/jpbs.20210016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite substantial suicide prevention efforts, US suicide rates continue to climb, currently reaching about 14 per 100,000 individuals. Suicidal behavior has been linked to neurobiological, neurocognitive and behavioral factors; however, integrative, multi-modal studies are rare. Furthermore, prospective studies, crucial to understanding future risk factors, have focused on a single predictor and a single outcome, implying that suicidal behavior is homogeneous. But recent research shows suicidal behavior is complex and heterogeneous, with the possible existence of subtypes. The present report describes a project testing a model that posits two putative subtypes, using a prospective, multi-model design. The subtypes differ in regard to the patterns of suicidal ideation and underlying mechanisms. One hundred subjects diagnosed with a Major Depressive episode, half of whom have attempted suicide in the past, are enrolled and followed for two years, notably the highest risk period for suicidal behavior. Baseline assessments include a clinical assessment, neurocognitive and behavioral tasks, Ecological Momentary Assessments (EMA), PET imaging, and a cognitive emotion regulation task in the MRI scanner. The follow-up assessment includes a clinical assessment and EMA. The study findings have the potential to pave the way for a clearer understanding of suicidal ideation and behaviors and to improve our ability to treat those at risk for suicide by developing tailored approaches that will allow for more accurate pharmacological and psychosocial interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":73912,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychiatry and brain science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8681698/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychiatry and brain science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20900/jpbs.20210016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Despite substantial suicide prevention efforts, US suicide rates continue to climb, currently reaching about 14 per 100,000 individuals. Suicidal behavior has been linked to neurobiological, neurocognitive and behavioral factors; however, integrative, multi-modal studies are rare. Furthermore, prospective studies, crucial to understanding future risk factors, have focused on a single predictor and a single outcome, implying that suicidal behavior is homogeneous. But recent research shows suicidal behavior is complex and heterogeneous, with the possible existence of subtypes. The present report describes a project testing a model that posits two putative subtypes, using a prospective, multi-model design. The subtypes differ in regard to the patterns of suicidal ideation and underlying mechanisms. One hundred subjects diagnosed with a Major Depressive episode, half of whom have attempted suicide in the past, are enrolled and followed for two years, notably the highest risk period for suicidal behavior. Baseline assessments include a clinical assessment, neurocognitive and behavioral tasks, Ecological Momentary Assessments (EMA), PET imaging, and a cognitive emotion regulation task in the MRI scanner. The follow-up assessment includes a clinical assessment and EMA. The study findings have the potential to pave the way for a clearer understanding of suicidal ideation and behaviors and to improve our ability to treat those at risk for suicide by developing tailored approaches that will allow for more accurate pharmacological and psychosocial interventions.

Abstract Image

识别两种自杀亚型的神经生物学基础。
尽管采取了大量的自杀预防措施,但美国的自杀率仍在攀升,目前已达到每10万人中有14人自杀。自杀行为与神经生物学、神经认知和行为因素有关;然而,综合的、多模式的研究却很少。此外,对了解未来风险因素至关重要的前瞻性研究集中在单一的预测因素和单一的结果上,这意味着自杀行为是同质的。但最近的研究表明,自杀行为是复杂和异质的,可能存在亚型。本报告描述了一个项目,该项目使用前瞻性多模型设计来测试一个假设两种假定亚型的模型。亚型在自杀意念模式和潜在机制方面有所不同。100名被诊断为严重抑郁症发作的受试者,其中一半过去曾试图自杀,被纳入研究并随访两年,尤其是自杀行为的最高风险期。基线评估包括临床评估、神经认知和行为任务、生态瞬时评估(EMA)、PET成像和MRI扫描仪中的认知情绪调节任务。后续评估包括临床评估和EMA。这项研究结果有可能为更清楚地了解自杀意念和行为铺平道路,并通过开发量身定制的方法来提高我们治疗自杀风险人群的能力,从而实现更准确的药物和心理社会干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信