Effect of contemplating patient care spiritual flow principles and mindfulness on trauma center nurses' wellbeing: a pilot trial.

IF 1.4 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
International Journal of Burns and Trauma Pub Date : 2021-12-15 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01
Carl M Dunham, Amanda J Burger, Barbara M Hileman, Elisha A Chance, Paul Lisko
{"title":"Effect of contemplating patient care spiritual flow principles and mindfulness on trauma center nurses' wellbeing: a pilot trial.","authors":"Carl M Dunham,&nbsp;Amanda J Burger,&nbsp;Barbara M Hileman,&nbsp;Elisha A Chance,&nbsp;Paul Lisko","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Trauma nurses commonly encounter stress and burnout and have increased negative affect states and decreased positive affect traits. This study investigated whether trauma center nurses would have improvements in wellbeing scores after reading and contemplating <i>Spiritual Flow: Pathways to Proficient Patient Care and Nurse & Physician Wellbeing</i> (<i>Spiritual Flow</i>). Trauma center surgical intensive care unit nurses completed a baseline and follow-up survey before and after reading and contemplating <i>Spiritual Flow</i>, which provides insights into spirituality and mindfulness. The survey contained four positive affect (PA) items, each rated 1-very little to 5-extremely, that were summed to create a PA score (PAS). The seven negative affect (NA) survey items were similarly rated and reverse coded, 1-extremely to 5-very little, to create a nonstress score (NSS). The PAS (4-20) and NSS (7-35) were summed to create a wellbeing score (WS). Nurses rated the degree to which they felt more peaceful or inspired after contemplating the book. Thirty-seven of 39 (95%) routine nursing staff members completed both surveys. Follow-up values increased for WS (P = 0.0001) and NSS (P = 0.0001) after reading and contemplating <i>Spiritual Flow</i> compared to baseline values. No changes occurred for PAS (P = 0.1606). Because 16% of nurses had a high PAS on the baseline survey, further analyses were performed on the other 84%. Significantly increased values were noted on follow-up for PAS (P = 0.0171), NSS (P = 0.0015), and WS (P = 0.0003) compared to baseline scores. Of 37 nurses, 24 (64.9%) rated feeling more peaceful and/or inspired as moderately or quite a bit. This pilot study suggests that contemplating <i>Spiritual Flow</i> was associated with improvements in surgical intensive care trauma center nurse wellbeing. These preliminary findings need to be confirmed in an investigation that includes a control group and randomization.</p>","PeriodicalId":45488,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8784743/pdf/ijbt0011-0477.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trauma nurses commonly encounter stress and burnout and have increased negative affect states and decreased positive affect traits. This study investigated whether trauma center nurses would have improvements in wellbeing scores after reading and contemplating Spiritual Flow: Pathways to Proficient Patient Care and Nurse & Physician Wellbeing (Spiritual Flow). Trauma center surgical intensive care unit nurses completed a baseline and follow-up survey before and after reading and contemplating Spiritual Flow, which provides insights into spirituality and mindfulness. The survey contained four positive affect (PA) items, each rated 1-very little to 5-extremely, that were summed to create a PA score (PAS). The seven negative affect (NA) survey items were similarly rated and reverse coded, 1-extremely to 5-very little, to create a nonstress score (NSS). The PAS (4-20) and NSS (7-35) were summed to create a wellbeing score (WS). Nurses rated the degree to which they felt more peaceful or inspired after contemplating the book. Thirty-seven of 39 (95%) routine nursing staff members completed both surveys. Follow-up values increased for WS (P = 0.0001) and NSS (P = 0.0001) after reading and contemplating Spiritual Flow compared to baseline values. No changes occurred for PAS (P = 0.1606). Because 16% of nurses had a high PAS on the baseline survey, further analyses were performed on the other 84%. Significantly increased values were noted on follow-up for PAS (P = 0.0171), NSS (P = 0.0015), and WS (P = 0.0003) compared to baseline scores. Of 37 nurses, 24 (64.9%) rated feeling more peaceful and/or inspired as moderately or quite a bit. This pilot study suggests that contemplating Spiritual Flow was associated with improvements in surgical intensive care trauma center nurse wellbeing. These preliminary findings need to be confirmed in an investigation that includes a control group and randomization.

思考病人护理精神流原则和正念对创伤中心护士幸福感的影响:一项试点试验。
创伤护士通常会遇到压力和倦怠,消极情绪状态增加,积极情绪特征减少。本研究调查创伤中心护士在阅读和思考《精神流:通往熟练病人护理的途径》和《护士和医生的幸福》(精神流)后,是否会有幸福感的提高。创伤中心外科重症监护室的护士在阅读和思考“精神流”之前和之后完成了一项基线和后续调查,该调查提供了对灵性和正念的见解。该调查包含四个积极影响(PA)项目,每个项目的评分为1-非常少到5-非常,这些项目被汇总成一个PA分数(PAS)。七个负面影响(NA)调查项目同样被评级和反向编码,1-极端到5-非常少,以创建一个非压力得分(NSS)。PAS(4-20)和NSS(7-35)被加起来形成一个幸福分数(WS)。护士们对她们在阅读这本书后感到更加平静或受到启发的程度进行了评分。39名常规护理人员中有37名(95%)完成了这两项调查。与基线值相比,阅读和思考精神流后WS (P = 0.0001)和NSS (P = 0.0001)的随访值增加。PAS无变化(P = 0.1606)。由于16%的护士在基线调查中具有高PAS,因此对另外84%的护士进行了进一步分析。与基线评分相比,PAS (P = 0.0171)、NSS (P = 0.0015)和WS (P = 0.0003)的随访值显著增加。在37名护士中,24名(64.9%)认为感觉更平静和/或更受鼓舞是中度或相当程度的。这项初步研究表明,思考精神流与外科重症监护创伤中心护士福祉的改善有关。这些初步发现需要在包括对照组和随机化的调查中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信