Large Artery Stiffness: A Companion to the 2015 AHA Science Statement on Arterial Stiffness.

IF 3.8 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Pulse Pub Date : 2021-08-19 eCollection Date: 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1159/000518613
Jimena Rey-García, Raymond R Townsend
{"title":"Large Artery Stiffness: A Companion to the 2015 AHA Science Statement on Arterial Stiffness.","authors":"Jimena Rey-García,&nbsp;Raymond R Townsend","doi":"10.1159/000518613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Large artery stiffness (LAS) has proven to be an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease and mortality. Nevertheless, the position of current hypertension guidelines regarding the usefulness of assessing LAS differs across different continents. In general, European Guidelines recognize pulse wave velocity (PWV) as a marker of target organ damage but do not recommend its systematic use in general population. Asian guidelines consider PWV as a recommended test at diagnosis of hypertension, in contrast to North American guidelines that do not state any position about its usefulness. However, PWV predicts cardiovascular events, and several studies have shown that it improves risk classification adjusting for established risk factors especially for intermediate-risk patients. Finally, some advances have been made related to treatments affecting LAS. Dietary interventions such as sodium restriction and exercise-based interventions have a modest effect in reducing LAS. Pharmacological interventions, such as statins, or more recent advances with mineralocorticoid blocker seem to have a beneficial effect. Last, controversial effects of renal denervation on LAS have been found. Our goal here is to update the reader on LAS on these areas since the 2015 American Heart Association Scientific Statement.</p>","PeriodicalId":29774,"journal":{"name":"Pulse","volume":"9 1-2","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8527919/pdf/pls-0009-0001.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000518613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Large artery stiffness (LAS) has proven to be an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease and mortality. Nevertheless, the position of current hypertension guidelines regarding the usefulness of assessing LAS differs across different continents. In general, European Guidelines recognize pulse wave velocity (PWV) as a marker of target organ damage but do not recommend its systematic use in general population. Asian guidelines consider PWV as a recommended test at diagnosis of hypertension, in contrast to North American guidelines that do not state any position about its usefulness. However, PWV predicts cardiovascular events, and several studies have shown that it improves risk classification adjusting for established risk factors especially for intermediate-risk patients. Finally, some advances have been made related to treatments affecting LAS. Dietary interventions such as sodium restriction and exercise-based interventions have a modest effect in reducing LAS. Pharmacological interventions, such as statins, or more recent advances with mineralocorticoid blocker seem to have a beneficial effect. Last, controversial effects of renal denervation on LAS have been found. Our goal here is to update the reader on LAS on these areas since the 2015 American Heart Association Scientific Statement.

大动脉硬化:2015 AHA动脉硬化科学声明的补充。
大动脉僵硬(LAS)已被证明是心血管疾病和死亡率的独立危险因素。然而,在评估LAS的有效性方面,目前的高血压指南在不同大陆的地位不同。一般来说,欧洲指南承认脉搏波速度(PWV)作为靶器官损伤的标志,但不建议在一般人群中系统使用。亚洲的指南将PWV作为高血压诊断的推荐检查,而北美的指南对PWV的有用性没有任何立场。然而,PWV可以预测心血管事件,一些研究表明,它可以改善针对既定危险因素的风险分类调整,特别是对于中等风险患者。最后,在影响LAS的治疗方面取得了一些进展。饮食干预如钠限制和运动干预对降低LAS的作用不大。药物干预,如他汀类药物,或最近的进展与矿皮质激素阻滞剂似乎有有益的影响。最后,肾去神经支配对LAS的影响存在争议。我们的目标是向读者更新自2015年美国心脏协会科学声明以来这些领域的LAS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
4.50%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信