Futility in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Search for Clarity.

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY
Interventional Cardiology Review Pub Date : 2022-01-18 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.15420/icr.2021.15
Kush P Patel, Thomas A Treibel, Paul R Scully, Michael Fertleman, Samuel Searle, Daniel Davis, James C Moon, Michael J Mullen
{"title":"Futility in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Search for Clarity.","authors":"Kush P Patel, Thomas A Treibel, Paul R Scully, Michael Fertleman, Samuel Searle, Daniel Davis, James C Moon, Michael J Mullen","doi":"10.15420/icr.2021.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has revolutionised the landscape of treatment for aortic stenosis, there exists a cohort of patients where TAVI is deemed futile. Among the pivotal high-risk trials, one-third to half of patients either died or received no symptomatic benefit from the procedure at 1 year. Futility of TAVI results in the unnecessary exposure of risk for patients and inefficient resource utilisation for healthcare services. Several cardiac and extra-cardiac conditions and frailty increase the risk of mortality despite TAVI. Among the survivors, these comorbidities can inhibit improvements in symptoms and quality of life. However, certain conditions are reversible with TAVI (e.g. functional mitral regurgitation), attenuating the risk and improving outcomes. Quantification of disease severity, identification of reversible factors and a systematic evaluation of frailty can substantially improve risk stratification and outcomes. This review examines the contribution of pre-existing comorbidities towards futility in TAVI and suggests a systematic approach to guide patient evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":38586,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Cardiology Review","volume":" ","pages":"e01"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3f/4b/icr-17-e01.PMC8790725.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Cardiology Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15420/icr.2021.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has revolutionised the landscape of treatment for aortic stenosis, there exists a cohort of patients where TAVI is deemed futile. Among the pivotal high-risk trials, one-third to half of patients either died or received no symptomatic benefit from the procedure at 1 year. Futility of TAVI results in the unnecessary exposure of risk for patients and inefficient resource utilisation for healthcare services. Several cardiac and extra-cardiac conditions and frailty increase the risk of mortality despite TAVI. Among the survivors, these comorbidities can inhibit improvements in symptoms and quality of life. However, certain conditions are reversible with TAVI (e.g. functional mitral regurgitation), attenuating the risk and improving outcomes. Quantification of disease severity, identification of reversible factors and a systematic evaluation of frailty can substantially improve risk stratification and outcomes. This review examines the contribution of pre-existing comorbidities towards futility in TAVI and suggests a systematic approach to guide patient evaluation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

经导管主动脉瓣植入术的无效性:对清晰度的探索。
尽管经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)已经彻底改变了主动脉瓣狭窄的治疗前景,但仍有一些患者认为TAVI是无效的。在关键高风险试验中,三分之一至一半的患者在1年后死亡或没有从手术中获得症状性获益。TAVI的无效导致患者不必要的风险暴露和医疗保健服务资源利用效率低下。尽管有TAVI,一些心脏和心脏外疾病和虚弱会增加死亡风险。在幸存者中,这些合并症会抑制症状和生活质量的改善。然而,某些情况是可逆的TAVI(如功能性二尖瓣反流),降低了风险,改善了结果。疾病严重程度的量化、可逆性因素的识别和虚弱的系统评估可以大大改善风险分层和结果。这篇综述探讨了TAVI中既存合并症对无效的影响,并提出了一种系统的方法来指导患者评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interventional Cardiology Review
Interventional Cardiology Review Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信