Shifts in Vaginal Bacterial Community Composition Are Associated With Vaginal Mesh Exposure.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Nicolette E Deveneau, Ryan J Newton, Anubhav Agrawal, Casey L Kinman, Guizhu Wu, Zhenmin Lei, Sean L Francis
{"title":"Shifts in Vaginal Bacterial Community Composition Are Associated With Vaginal Mesh Exposure.","authors":"Nicolette E Deveneau,&nbsp;Ryan J Newton,&nbsp;Anubhav Agrawal,&nbsp;Casey L Kinman,&nbsp;Guizhu Wu,&nbsp;Zhenmin Lei,&nbsp;Sean L Francis","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between vaginal mesh exposure and vaginal bacterial community composition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Vaginal swab samples were collected from 13 women undergoing excision of vaginal mesh with vaginal mesh exposure. Samples were collected at the midvagina, site of exposure, and underneath the vaginal epithelium at the exposure. Control samples were collected vaginally during 15 new patient examinations. For all samples, we extracted genomic DNA and polymerase chain reaction amplified and sequenced the 16S rRNA gene V4 region. We tested for differences in the microbiota among control and exposure samples with PERMANOVA tests of beta diversity measures (Morisita-Horn dissimilarity) and Wilcoxon rank sum tests of Lactobacillus distribution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Vaginal bacterial communities in both control and case groups were divided into 2 primary community types, one characterized by Lactobacillus dominance (>50% of community) and the other by low Lactobacillus and a high diversity of vaginal anaerobes. In 10 of 13 case women, bacterial communities were highly similar between the 3 vaginal sites (adonis R2 = 0.86, P = 0.0099). In the 3 women with community divergence, all 3 were characterized by decreased Lactobacillus abundance at the exposure site. Overall, Lactobacillus abundance was lower at the site of mesh exposure and under the epithelium than in the experimental control (W = 137, P = 0.072, r = 0.41; W = 146, P = 0.025, r = 0.50). Common putative pathogenic mesh colonizing bacteria were common (in 51 of 54 samples), but generally not abundant (median relative abundance = 0.014%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In vaginal mesh exposure cases, a woman is more likely to have a diverse, non-Lactobacillus-dominant community.</p>","PeriodicalId":48831,"journal":{"name":"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"27 11","pages":"e681-e686"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001097","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between vaginal mesh exposure and vaginal bacterial community composition.

Methods: Vaginal swab samples were collected from 13 women undergoing excision of vaginal mesh with vaginal mesh exposure. Samples were collected at the midvagina, site of exposure, and underneath the vaginal epithelium at the exposure. Control samples were collected vaginally during 15 new patient examinations. For all samples, we extracted genomic DNA and polymerase chain reaction amplified and sequenced the 16S rRNA gene V4 region. We tested for differences in the microbiota among control and exposure samples with PERMANOVA tests of beta diversity measures (Morisita-Horn dissimilarity) and Wilcoxon rank sum tests of Lactobacillus distribution.

Results: Vaginal bacterial communities in both control and case groups were divided into 2 primary community types, one characterized by Lactobacillus dominance (>50% of community) and the other by low Lactobacillus and a high diversity of vaginal anaerobes. In 10 of 13 case women, bacterial communities were highly similar between the 3 vaginal sites (adonis R2 = 0.86, P = 0.0099). In the 3 women with community divergence, all 3 were characterized by decreased Lactobacillus abundance at the exposure site. Overall, Lactobacillus abundance was lower at the site of mesh exposure and under the epithelium than in the experimental control (W = 137, P = 0.072, r = 0.41; W = 146, P = 0.025, r = 0.50). Common putative pathogenic mesh colonizing bacteria were common (in 51 of 54 samples), but generally not abundant (median relative abundance = 0.014%).

Conclusions: In vaginal mesh exposure cases, a woman is more likely to have a diverse, non-Lactobacillus-dominant community.

阴道细菌群落组成的变化与阴道网片暴露有关。
目的:探讨阴道网片暴露与阴道细菌群落组成的关系。方法:对13例阴道网片切除术后阴道网片暴露的妇女进行阴道拭子取样。在阴道中部、暴露部位和暴露时阴道上皮下采集样本。在15例新患者的阴道检查中收集对照样本。对所有样本提取基因组DNA,聚合酶链反应扩增16S rRNA基因V4区并测序。我们使用PERMANOVA测试(morisata - horn不相似性)和Wilcoxon秩和测试(Lactobacillus distribution)来测试对照和暴露样本之间微生物群的差异。结果:对照组和病例组阴道细菌群落划分为2种主要群落类型,一种以乳酸菌为主(>50%),另一种以乳酸菌含量低和阴道厌氧菌多样性高为特征。在13例女性患者中,10例阴道3个部位的细菌群落高度相似(adonis R2 = 0.86, P = 0.0099)。在3名出现菌群分化的女性中,均表现出暴露部位乳酸杆菌丰度降低的特征。总体而言,网状物暴露部位和上皮下的乳酸杆菌丰度低于实验对照组(W = 137, P = 0.072, r = 0.41;W = 146, P = 0.025, r = 0.50)。常见的假定致病性网状定植细菌很常见(54个样本中的51个),但通常不丰富(中位相对丰度= 0.014%)。结论:在阴道网片暴露的情况下,女性更有可能有一个多样化的,非乳酸杆菌为主的群落。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
228
期刊介绍: Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery, official journal of the American Urogynecologic Society, is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to specialists, physicians and allied health professionals concerned with prevention, diagnosis and treatment of female pelvic floor disorders. The journal publishes original clinical research, basic science research, education, scientific advances, case reports, scientific reviews, editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信