Correlation between assisted reproductive technology-induced pregnancy and fetal cardiac anomalies.

IF 1.9
Mahvash Zargar, Maryam Rahimi, Mojgan Barati, Farideh Moramazi, Abdolrahman Emami Moghadam, Parastoo Moradi Choghakabodi
{"title":"Correlation between assisted reproductive technology-induced pregnancy and fetal cardiac anomalies.","authors":"Mahvash Zargar,&nbsp;Maryam Rahimi,&nbsp;Mojgan Barati,&nbsp;Farideh Moramazi,&nbsp;Abdolrahman Emami Moghadam,&nbsp;Parastoo Moradi Choghakabodi","doi":"10.5935/1518-0557.20210088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the incidence of fetal heart defects in assisted reproductive technology (ART)-induced pregnancies compared to natural pregnancies as well as to detect their fetal and maternal risk factors associated with ART.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, we collected data from the medical records belonging to 2877 pregnant women's fetuses, who underwent fetal echocardiography for various reasons, including ART, over the last 3 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no major cardiac anomaly in the ART-induced pregnancies, while it was seen in 1.32% of natural pregnancies; so, ART did not increase the risk of major cardiac anomalies. However, the incidence of fetal mild cardiac anomalies among fetuses derived from ART-induced pregnancies (51.43%) was significantly higher than that of natural pregnancies (44.43%, p=0.03). None of the ART-induced pregnancies had a history of a child with cardiac disease (vs. 7.56% in natural pregnancies). Also, the increased nuchal thickness (NT) and extra-cardiac anomalies were significantly more prevalent among natural pregnancies, indicating a significant negative correlation between ART and these two risk factors [χ2=10.24, r: -0.06, 95% CI(-0.0974 to -0.0221) and χ2=47.25, r: -0.129, 95% CI(-0.1656 to -0.0913), p<0.01, respectively]. The adjusted odds ratio of developing fetal mild cardiac anomalies were 1.37 times higher greater for ART-induced pregnancies compared to natural pregnancies [95% CI(1.072-1.769), p=0.01].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the likelihood of developing fetal mild cardiac anomalies was 1.37 times higher for ART-induced pregnancy compared to natural pregnancy, ART did not increase the risk of major cardiac anomalies Although the likelihood of developing fetal mild cardiac anomalies was 1.37 times higher for ART-induced pregnancy compared to natural pregnancy, ART did not increase the risk of major cardiac anomalies.</p>","PeriodicalId":520656,"journal":{"name":"JBRA assisted reproduction","volume":" ","pages":"329-334"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9118956/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBRA assisted reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20210088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the incidence of fetal heart defects in assisted reproductive technology (ART)-induced pregnancies compared to natural pregnancies as well as to detect their fetal and maternal risk factors associated with ART.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we collected data from the medical records belonging to 2877 pregnant women's fetuses, who underwent fetal echocardiography for various reasons, including ART, over the last 3 years.

Results: There were no major cardiac anomaly in the ART-induced pregnancies, while it was seen in 1.32% of natural pregnancies; so, ART did not increase the risk of major cardiac anomalies. However, the incidence of fetal mild cardiac anomalies among fetuses derived from ART-induced pregnancies (51.43%) was significantly higher than that of natural pregnancies (44.43%, p=0.03). None of the ART-induced pregnancies had a history of a child with cardiac disease (vs. 7.56% in natural pregnancies). Also, the increased nuchal thickness (NT) and extra-cardiac anomalies were significantly more prevalent among natural pregnancies, indicating a significant negative correlation between ART and these two risk factors [χ2=10.24, r: -0.06, 95% CI(-0.0974 to -0.0221) and χ2=47.25, r: -0.129, 95% CI(-0.1656 to -0.0913), p<0.01, respectively]. The adjusted odds ratio of developing fetal mild cardiac anomalies were 1.37 times higher greater for ART-induced pregnancies compared to natural pregnancies [95% CI(1.072-1.769), p=0.01].

Conclusions: Although the likelihood of developing fetal mild cardiac anomalies was 1.37 times higher for ART-induced pregnancy compared to natural pregnancy, ART did not increase the risk of major cardiac anomalies Although the likelihood of developing fetal mild cardiac anomalies was 1.37 times higher for ART-induced pregnancy compared to natural pregnancy, ART did not increase the risk of major cardiac anomalies.

辅助生殖技术诱发妊娠与胎儿心脏异常的相关性研究。
目的:探讨辅助生殖技术(ART)诱导妊娠与自然妊娠相比胎儿心脏缺陷的发生率,并探讨其与ART相关的胎儿和母体危险因素。方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们收集了2877例孕妇胎儿的医疗记录数据,这些胎儿在过去3年中因各种原因(包括ART)接受了胎儿超声心动图检查。结果:art诱导妊娠无重大心脏异常,自然妊娠有1.32%;因此,ART并没有增加主要心脏异常的风险。然而,art诱导妊娠胎儿轻度心脏异常发生率(51.43%)明显高于自然妊娠(44.43%,p=0.03)。art诱导妊娠中没有儿童心脏病史(自然妊娠中为7.56%)。此外,自然妊娠中颈厚增加(NT)和心外异常明显更普遍,表明ART与这两个危险因素呈显著负相关[χ2=10.24, r: -0.06, 95% CI(-0.0974 ~ -0.0221), χ2=47.25, r: -0.129, 95% CI(-0.1656 ~ -0.0913), p]。虽然ART诱导妊娠发生胎儿轻度心脏异常的可能性是自然妊娠的1.37倍,但ART并没有增加发生重大心脏异常的风险。虽然ART诱导妊娠发生胎儿轻度心脏异常的可能性是自然妊娠的1.37倍,但ART并没有增加发生重大心脏异常的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信