Developing and conducting appreciative inquiry interviews.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2021-12-09 Epub Date: 2021-10-27 DOI:10.7748/nr.2021.e1811
Fiona Arundell, Athena Sheehan, Kath Peters
{"title":"Developing and conducting appreciative inquiry interviews.","authors":"Fiona Arundell,&nbsp;Athena Sheehan,&nbsp;Kath Peters","doi":"10.7748/nr.2021.e1811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The appreciative inquiry (AI) interview follows a specific format and needs to be planned and developed before implementation. AI questions are designed to draw on the interviewee's experiences, commencing with general questioning and progressing to more focused questioning.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explain how to plan and undertake AI interviews, and to discuss issues that nurse researchers might encounter.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This article is based on the first author's experience of undertaking an AI doctoral study. The primary method of collecting data for the study was AI interviews. The more focused questioning related to participants' experiences of positive actions or behaviours. Although questioning was positive in nature and participant-centric, conducting the interviews was more problematic than the first author anticipated. Some participants struggled to recall positive memories to share.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The unexpected response to the interview questions required the first author to examine her practices, as well as beliefs and judgements relating to AI. This reflexivity assisted in implementing changes to the study's process, resulting in a more positive experience for her and the participants.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Researchers using the AI interview require the capacity to be self-critical and change the process if necessary to enrich the outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2021.e1811","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The appreciative inquiry (AI) interview follows a specific format and needs to be planned and developed before implementation. AI questions are designed to draw on the interviewee's experiences, commencing with general questioning and progressing to more focused questioning.

Aim: To explain how to plan and undertake AI interviews, and to discuss issues that nurse researchers might encounter.

Discussion: This article is based on the first author's experience of undertaking an AI doctoral study. The primary method of collecting data for the study was AI interviews. The more focused questioning related to participants' experiences of positive actions or behaviours. Although questioning was positive in nature and participant-centric, conducting the interviews was more problematic than the first author anticipated. Some participants struggled to recall positive memories to share.

Conclusion: The unexpected response to the interview questions required the first author to examine her practices, as well as beliefs and judgements relating to AI. This reflexivity assisted in implementing changes to the study's process, resulting in a more positive experience for her and the participants.

Implications for practice: Researchers using the AI interview require the capacity to be self-critical and change the process if necessary to enrich the outcome.

发展并进行赞赏式问询面谈。
背景:赞赏式询问(AI)访谈遵循特定的格式,需要在实施前进行计划和开发。人工智能问题旨在借鉴受访者的经验,从一般性问题开始,逐步发展到更集中的问题。目的:解释如何计划和进行人工智能访谈,并讨论护士研究人员可能遇到的问题。讨论:本文基于第一作者从事人工智能博士研究的经历。该研究收集数据的主要方法是人工智能访谈。更集中的问题与参与者积极行动或行为的经历有关。虽然提问本质上是积极的,以参与者为中心,但进行访谈比第一作者预期的更有问题。一些参与者很难回忆起积极的记忆来分享。结论:对采访问题的意外回应要求第一作者检查她的实践,以及与人工智能有关的信念和判断。这种反身性有助于对研究过程进行更改,从而为她和参与者带来更积极的体验。对实践的启示:使用人工智能访谈的研究人员需要有自我批评的能力,并在必要时改变过程以丰富结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信