Comparing the Efficacy of a Nurse-Driven and a Physician-Driven Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA) Treatment Protocol.

IF 3.1 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications Pub Date : 2021-10-07 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CPAA.S334119
Takla R Anis, Marybeth Boudreau, Tyson Thornton
{"title":"Comparing the Efficacy of a Nurse-Driven and a Physician-Driven Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA) Treatment Protocol.","authors":"Takla R Anis,&nbsp;Marybeth Boudreau,&nbsp;Tyson Thornton","doi":"10.2147/CPAA.S334119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Standardized DKA treatment could result in better overall safety and efficacy outcomes. The primary objective of this study is to validate the efficacy of an adapted nurse-driven DKA protocol compared to a physician-driven DKA protocol across the continuum of three hospital settings: the University of Colorado upon which the physician-driven protocol is based, Northern Light Eastern Maine Medical Center (NLEMMC), and Northern Light Sebasticook Valley Hospital (NLSVH). The secondary objective is to assess the safety of the adapted nurse-driven DKA protocol adapted at NLEMMC and NLSVH through determining the incidence of hypoglycemia and anion gap reopening.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, IRB-approved, multi-center study that included: patients 18 years or older who were treated with the DKA protocol at NLEMMC or NLSVH, and admitted to the emergency department between July 2015 and October 2020 with a primary diagnosis of DKA and an elevated anion gap greater than or equal to 13 mEq/L.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 90 patients from NLEMMC and 64 patients from NLSVH were included and compared to 111 patients from the University of Colorado who were included in the post protocol implementation group. There was no statistically significant difference in the primary outcome, time to anion gap closure, between the original University of Colorado study (10.3 hours) and the NLEMMC (10.9 hours, <i>p</i> = 0.420) and NLSVH (8.8 hours, <i>p</i> = 0.115) results presented in this study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The standardized nurse-driven DKA treatment protocol at NLEMMC and NLSVH showed no statistical difference in time to anion gap closure compared to the University of Colorado study upon which it was based. This finding is particularly relevant to hospitals such as NLEMMC and NLSVH that lack provider resources and teams of endocrinologists required for the physician-driven DKA protocol.</p>","PeriodicalId":10406,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications","volume":" ","pages":"197-202"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4d/e7/cpaa-13-197.PMC8504870.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CPAA.S334119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Standardized DKA treatment could result in better overall safety and efficacy outcomes. The primary objective of this study is to validate the efficacy of an adapted nurse-driven DKA protocol compared to a physician-driven DKA protocol across the continuum of three hospital settings: the University of Colorado upon which the physician-driven protocol is based, Northern Light Eastern Maine Medical Center (NLEMMC), and Northern Light Sebasticook Valley Hospital (NLSVH). The secondary objective is to assess the safety of the adapted nurse-driven DKA protocol adapted at NLEMMC and NLSVH through determining the incidence of hypoglycemia and anion gap reopening.

Patients and methods: This was a retrospective, IRB-approved, multi-center study that included: patients 18 years or older who were treated with the DKA protocol at NLEMMC or NLSVH, and admitted to the emergency department between July 2015 and October 2020 with a primary diagnosis of DKA and an elevated anion gap greater than or equal to 13 mEq/L.

Results: A total of 90 patients from NLEMMC and 64 patients from NLSVH were included and compared to 111 patients from the University of Colorado who were included in the post protocol implementation group. There was no statistically significant difference in the primary outcome, time to anion gap closure, between the original University of Colorado study (10.3 hours) and the NLEMMC (10.9 hours, p = 0.420) and NLSVH (8.8 hours, p = 0.115) results presented in this study.

Conclusion: The standardized nurse-driven DKA treatment protocol at NLEMMC and NLSVH showed no statistical difference in time to anion gap closure compared to the University of Colorado study upon which it was based. This finding is particularly relevant to hospitals such as NLEMMC and NLSVH that lack provider resources and teams of endocrinologists required for the physician-driven DKA protocol.

比较护士驱动和医生驱动的糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)治疗方案的疗效。
背景:标准化DKA治疗可获得更好的总体安全性和有效性结果。本研究的主要目的是在三家医院的连续环境中验证经过调整的护士驱动的DKA协议与医生驱动的DKA协议的有效性,这三家医院是:医生驱动协议的基础科罗拉多大学、北极光缅因东部医疗中心(NLEMMC)和北极光塞巴斯蒂安谷医院(NLSVH)。次要目的是通过确定低血糖和阴离子间隙重新打开的发生率,评估NLEMMC和NLSVH采用的护士驱动的DKA方案的安全性。患者和方法:这是一项回顾性的、经irb批准的多中心研究,包括:在2015年7月至2020年10月期间在NLEMMC或NLSVH接受DKA方案治疗的18岁或以上的患者,这些患者最初诊断为DKA,阴离子间隙升高大于或等于13 mEq/L。结果:共有90名NLEMMC患者和64名NLSVH患者被纳入,而来自科罗拉多大学的111名患者被纳入方案实施后组。科罗拉多大学的原始研究(10.3小时)与NLEMMC(10.9小时,p = 0.420)和NLSVH(8.8小时,p = 0.115)的主要结局(阴离子间隙闭合时间)无统计学差异。结论:NLEMMC和NLSVH的标准化护士驱动DKA治疗方案与其所依据的科罗拉多大学研究相比,阴离子间隙闭合时间无统计学差异。这一发现与NLEMMC和NLSVH等医院特别相关,这些医院缺乏医生驱动的DKA协议所需的提供者资源和内分泌学家团队。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信