Patient competencies, coping self-efficacy, and coping: Do they change during oncological inpatient rehabilitation and beyond?

Psycho-Oncology Pub Date : 2022-04-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-29 DOI:10.1002/pon.5839
Juergen M Giesler, Joachim Weis, Reiner Caspari, Timm Dauelsberg, Wilfried Hoffmann, Jürgen Körber, Hans-Helge Bartsch
{"title":"Patient competencies, coping self-efficacy, and coping: Do they change during oncological inpatient rehabilitation and beyond?","authors":"Juergen M Giesler,&nbsp;Joachim Weis,&nbsp;Reiner Caspari,&nbsp;Timm Dauelsberg,&nbsp;Wilfried Hoffmann,&nbsp;Jürgen Körber,&nbsp;Hans-Helge Bartsch","doi":"10.1002/pon.5839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The construct of Patient Competencies (PCs) has been suggested to allow a more comprehensive understanding of cancer patients' abilities to confront emotion- and problem-focused coping tasks arising from the diagnosis, treatment and survivorship of cancer. While providing a reliable and valid measure of PCs, research thus far has not clarified whether PCs change across time and/or through intervention. This study asks whether PCs change during oncological inpatient rehabilitation and beyond.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>N = 377 breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer patients from clinics for oncological rehabilitation were included to complete self-report measures of PC, coping and self-efficacy for coping with cancer at the beginning and the end of rehabilitation and 9 months afterward. In order to determine differences between tumor diagnostic groups and changes across time 3 (tumor site) x 3 (time) repeated measures analyses of variance were computed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Tumor diagnostic groups differed only marginally in PCs, coping self-efficacy and coping. The PCs of self-regulation and managing distress and coping self-efficacy improved slightly during rehabilitation but returned to initial levels at 9 months. Differential improvement was evident in the competencies of seeking information and interest in social services. Two of five coping behaviors decreased markedly from the end of rehabilitation to follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that oncological inpatient rehabilitation may contribute to advancing PCs, albeit to a limited extent. Aside from addressing conceptual, diagnostic and measurement issues, future research should clarify which interventions may be most effective for advancing problem- and emotion-focused PCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":516935,"journal":{"name":"Psycho-Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"577-586"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: The construct of Patient Competencies (PCs) has been suggested to allow a more comprehensive understanding of cancer patients' abilities to confront emotion- and problem-focused coping tasks arising from the diagnosis, treatment and survivorship of cancer. While providing a reliable and valid measure of PCs, research thus far has not clarified whether PCs change across time and/or through intervention. This study asks whether PCs change during oncological inpatient rehabilitation and beyond.

Methods: N = 377 breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer patients from clinics for oncological rehabilitation were included to complete self-report measures of PC, coping and self-efficacy for coping with cancer at the beginning and the end of rehabilitation and 9 months afterward. In order to determine differences between tumor diagnostic groups and changes across time 3 (tumor site) x 3 (time) repeated measures analyses of variance were computed.

Results: Tumor diagnostic groups differed only marginally in PCs, coping self-efficacy and coping. The PCs of self-regulation and managing distress and coping self-efficacy improved slightly during rehabilitation but returned to initial levels at 9 months. Differential improvement was evident in the competencies of seeking information and interest in social services. Two of five coping behaviors decreased markedly from the end of rehabilitation to follow-up.

Conclusions: This study suggests that oncological inpatient rehabilitation may contribute to advancing PCs, albeit to a limited extent. Aside from addressing conceptual, diagnostic and measurement issues, future research should clarify which interventions may be most effective for advancing problem- and emotion-focused PCs.

患者能力、应对自我效能和应对:它们在肿瘤住院康复期间及以后会发生变化吗?
目的:提出构建患者胜任力(PCs),以便更全面地了解癌症患者在诊断、治疗和生存过程中面对以情绪和问题为中心的应对任务的能力。虽然提供了可靠而有效的个人电脑测量方法,但迄今为止的研究尚未阐明个人电脑是否会随着时间和/或通过干预而改变。本研究探讨肿瘤住院康复期间及以后pc是否发生改变。方法:选取377例接受肿瘤康复治疗的乳腺癌、结直肠癌和前列腺癌患者,分别在康复开始、结束时和康复后9个月完成自我报告的PC、应对和应对癌症的自我效能。为了确定肿瘤诊断组之间的差异和时间3(肿瘤部位)× 3(时间)的变化,计算重复测量方差分析。结果:肿瘤诊断组在PCs、应对自我效能和应对方面差异不大。自我调节、处理痛苦和应对自我效能在康复期间略有改善,但在9个月时恢复到初始水平。在获取信息的能力和对社会服务的兴趣方面,明显有不同程度的改善。从康复结束到随访期间,五名患者中有两名的应对行为明显下降。结论:本研究提示肿瘤住院康复可能有助于推进pc,尽管在一定程度上。除了解决概念、诊断和测量问题外,未来的研究应该澄清哪些干预措施可能对推进以问题和情感为中心的个人电脑最有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信