Preseptal Versus Orbital Cellulitis in Children: An Observational Study.

Javier Miranda-Barrios, Blanca Bravo-Queipo-de-Llano, Fernando Baquero-Artigao, María Granados-Fernandez, Susana Noval, Ignacio Rabanal, Ana Méndez-Echevarría, Teresa Del Rosal, Talía Sainz, Javier Aracil, Cristina Calvo
{"title":"Preseptal Versus Orbital Cellulitis in Children: An Observational Study.","authors":"Javier Miranda-Barrios,&nbsp;Blanca Bravo-Queipo-de-Llano,&nbsp;Fernando Baquero-Artigao,&nbsp;María Granados-Fernandez,&nbsp;Susana Noval,&nbsp;Ignacio Rabanal,&nbsp;Ana Méndez-Echevarría,&nbsp;Teresa Del Rosal,&nbsp;Talía Sainz,&nbsp;Javier Aracil,&nbsp;Cristina Calvo","doi":"10.1097/INF.0000000000003226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preseptal and orbital cellulitis are two types of infection surrounding the orbital septum with very different potential outcomes. Our aim was to describe key differential features of both conditions, laying special emphasis on diagnostic and therapeutic tools.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of patients admitted to a tertiary hospital over a 15-year period (January 2004-October 2019) was conducted. We included 198 patients with preseptal and 45 with orbital cellulitis. Descriptive statistics were performed to examine the available information.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistically significant differences were found between patients with preseptal and orbital cellulitis regarding age (3.9 ± 2.14 vs. 7.5 ± 4.24 years), presence of fever (51.5% vs. 82.2%), and preexisting sinusitis (2% vs. 77.8%) (all P < 0.001). Diplopia, ophthalmoplegia and proptosis were only present in orbital cellulitis (P < 0.001). Median values of C-reactive protein were significantly higher among children with orbital involvement [136.35 mg/L (IQR 74.08-168.98) vs. 17.85 (IQR 6.33-50.10), P < 0.0001]. A CRP>120 mg/L cut-off point for orbital cellulitis was obtained. Early CT scans were performed in 75.6% of suspected orbital cellulitis and helped detecting complications at an early stage. Abscesses were revealed in 70.6% of cases, especially medial subperiosteal abscesses (58.8%). All patients received intravenous antibiotics, whereas corticosteroids were preferred in patients with orbital implication (8.6% vs. 73.3%, P < 0.001). Only 26.7% of patients required additional surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinical presentation and CRP are extremely sensitive for differential diagnosis of preseptal and orbital cellulitis. Prompt initiation of intravenous antibiotics is mandatory and can prevent surgical procedures even in cases with incipient abscesses.</p>","PeriodicalId":118937,"journal":{"name":"The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal","volume":" ","pages":"969-974"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000003226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Preseptal and orbital cellulitis are two types of infection surrounding the orbital septum with very different potential outcomes. Our aim was to describe key differential features of both conditions, laying special emphasis on diagnostic and therapeutic tools.

Methods: A retrospective review of patients admitted to a tertiary hospital over a 15-year period (January 2004-October 2019) was conducted. We included 198 patients with preseptal and 45 with orbital cellulitis. Descriptive statistics were performed to examine the available information.

Results: Statistically significant differences were found between patients with preseptal and orbital cellulitis regarding age (3.9 ± 2.14 vs. 7.5 ± 4.24 years), presence of fever (51.5% vs. 82.2%), and preexisting sinusitis (2% vs. 77.8%) (all P < 0.001). Diplopia, ophthalmoplegia and proptosis were only present in orbital cellulitis (P < 0.001). Median values of C-reactive protein were significantly higher among children with orbital involvement [136.35 mg/L (IQR 74.08-168.98) vs. 17.85 (IQR 6.33-50.10), P < 0.0001]. A CRP>120 mg/L cut-off point for orbital cellulitis was obtained. Early CT scans were performed in 75.6% of suspected orbital cellulitis and helped detecting complications at an early stage. Abscesses were revealed in 70.6% of cases, especially medial subperiosteal abscesses (58.8%). All patients received intravenous antibiotics, whereas corticosteroids were preferred in patients with orbital implication (8.6% vs. 73.3%, P < 0.001). Only 26.7% of patients required additional surgery.

Conclusions: Clinical presentation and CRP are extremely sensitive for differential diagnosis of preseptal and orbital cellulitis. Prompt initiation of intravenous antibiotics is mandatory and can prevent surgical procedures even in cases with incipient abscesses.

儿童鼻窦炎与眼眶蜂窝织炎:一项观察性研究。
背景:眶隔前蜂窝织炎和眶隔蜂窝织炎是眶隔周围的两种感染,其潜在的结局非常不同。我们的目的是描述这两种疾病的关键区别特征,特别强调诊断和治疗工具。方法:对某三级医院15年(2004年1月- 2019年10月)住院患者进行回顾性分析。我们纳入了198例眶前蜂窝织炎和45例眶前蜂窝织炎。进行描述性统计以检验可用信息。结果:鼻中隔和眶部蜂窝织炎患者在年龄(3.9±2.14岁∶7.5±4.24岁)、发热(51.5%∶82.2%)和既往存在鼻窦炎(2%∶77.8%)方面存在统计学差异(均P < 0.001)。复视、眼球麻痹和眼球突出仅在眼眶蜂窝织炎中出现(P < 0.001)。眼眶受累患儿c -反应蛋白中位值明显高于对照组[136.35 mg/L (IQR 74.08-168.98) vs. 17.85 (IQR 6.33-50.10), P < 0.0001]。眼窝蜂窝织炎的CRP>120 mg/L临界值。早期CT扫描在75.6%的疑似眼眶蜂窝织炎中进行,有助于早期发现并发症。脓肿发生率为70.6%,以内侧骨膜下脓肿发生率最高(58.8%)。所有患者均接受静脉注射抗生素,而有眼窝影响的患者更倾向于使用皮质类固醇(8.6%比73.3%,P < 0.001)。只有26.7%的患者需要额外的手术。结论:临床表现及CRP对眶前蜂窝织炎的鉴别诊断极为敏感。立即开始静脉注射抗生素是强制性的,即使在早期脓肿的情况下也可以避免外科手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信