Comparison of Perceptions and Smoking Cessation Experiences Between Smokers With and Without Serious Mental Illness in a Large Health Maintenance Organization.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Journal of Dual Diagnosis Pub Date : 2021-10-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-15 DOI:10.1080/15504263.2021.1979348
Jennifer Kertes, Yehuda Neumark, Leon Grunhaus, Orit Stein-Reisner
{"title":"Comparison of Perceptions and Smoking Cessation Experiences Between Smokers With and Without Serious Mental Illness in a Large Health Maintenance Organization.","authors":"Jennifer Kertes,&nbsp;Yehuda Neumark,&nbsp;Leon Grunhaus,&nbsp;Orit Stein-Reisner","doi":"10.1080/15504263.2021.1979348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Smoking prevalence is threefold higher among people with serious mental illness (PWSMI) than in the general population, yet smoking cessation rates for PWSMI are lower. Numerous reasons have been posited as to why tobacco use is higher and abstinence rates are lower among PWSMI. This study explores smoking cessation perceptions and experiences among PWSMI and people without serious mental illness (SMI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants in this cross-sectional study were recruited from among members of a large health maintenance organization (HMO) in Israel who had registered for or commenced a smoking cessation program in 2015 through 2017. The sample comprised 208 PWSMI and a matched sample of people without SMI (<i>N</i> = 428). Telephone surveys were used to collect information about smoking status and smoking/cessation history, use of smoking cessation programs and aids (prescription medications, nicotine replacement therapy, electronic cigarettes), motivation and intention to quit, self-efficacy (to quit), smoking cessation outcome expectancies, physician support to quit, barriers and facilitators for those who had not quit, and reinforcements/challenges for those who had quit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of those without SMI, 27% quit smoking compared to 20% of PWSMI (<i>p</i> = .051). Irrespective of mental health status, the most significant predictor of abstinence was the use of smoking cessation prescription medications. Family physicians were significantly less likely to inquire about motivation to quit, refer to smoking cessation programs, or prescribe smoking cessation medications for PWSMI than for people without SMI. Beyond these factors, no differences were noted between respondents with and without SMI regarding motivation to quit, intention to quit, and abstinence self-efficacy. PWSMI who had not quit were more likely to be concerned about how quitting might affect their functioning and how they would pass the time without cigarettes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PWSMI have similar levels of motivation and intention to quit smoking as those without SMI. However, they are disadvantaged by the reduced support received from their family physicians and lower cessation medication usage. Efforts to promote the implementation of smoking cessation treatment guidelines will help promote smoking abstinence among PWSMI.</p>","PeriodicalId":46571,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2021.1979348","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective: Smoking prevalence is threefold higher among people with serious mental illness (PWSMI) than in the general population, yet smoking cessation rates for PWSMI are lower. Numerous reasons have been posited as to why tobacco use is higher and abstinence rates are lower among PWSMI. This study explores smoking cessation perceptions and experiences among PWSMI and people without serious mental illness (SMI).

Methods: Participants in this cross-sectional study were recruited from among members of a large health maintenance organization (HMO) in Israel who had registered for or commenced a smoking cessation program in 2015 through 2017. The sample comprised 208 PWSMI and a matched sample of people without SMI (N = 428). Telephone surveys were used to collect information about smoking status and smoking/cessation history, use of smoking cessation programs and aids (prescription medications, nicotine replacement therapy, electronic cigarettes), motivation and intention to quit, self-efficacy (to quit), smoking cessation outcome expectancies, physician support to quit, barriers and facilitators for those who had not quit, and reinforcements/challenges for those who had quit.

Results: Of those without SMI, 27% quit smoking compared to 20% of PWSMI (p = .051). Irrespective of mental health status, the most significant predictor of abstinence was the use of smoking cessation prescription medications. Family physicians were significantly less likely to inquire about motivation to quit, refer to smoking cessation programs, or prescribe smoking cessation medications for PWSMI than for people without SMI. Beyond these factors, no differences were noted between respondents with and without SMI regarding motivation to quit, intention to quit, and abstinence self-efficacy. PWSMI who had not quit were more likely to be concerned about how quitting might affect their functioning and how they would pass the time without cigarettes.

Conclusions: PWSMI have similar levels of motivation and intention to quit smoking as those without SMI. However, they are disadvantaged by the reduced support received from their family physicians and lower cessation medication usage. Efforts to promote the implementation of smoking cessation treatment guidelines will help promote smoking abstinence among PWSMI.

某大型健康维护机构中有与无严重精神疾病吸烟者认知及戒烟经历的比较
目的:严重精神疾病(PWSMI)患者的吸烟率是普通人群的三倍,但PWSMI患者的戒烟率较低。关于为什么在PWSMI人群中烟草使用率较高而戒断率较低,已经提出了许多原因。本研究探讨重度精神疾病患者(PWSMI)和非重度精神疾病患者(SMI)的戒烟认知和经历。方法:本横断面研究的参与者是从以色列一家大型健康维护组织(HMO)的成员中招募的,这些成员在2015年至2017年期间注册或开始戒烟计划。样本包括208名PWSMI患者和一个匹配的非SMI患者样本(N = 428)。使用电话调查收集有关吸烟状况和吸烟/戒烟史、戒烟计划和辅助工具(处方药、尼古丁替代疗法、电子烟)的使用、戒烟动机和意图、自我效能(戒烟)、戒烟结果预期、医生对戒烟的支持、未戒烟者的障碍和促进因素,以及戒烟者的加强/挑战等信息。结果:在没有重度精神障碍的患者中,27%的人戒烟,而重度精神障碍患者中戒烟的比例为20% (p = 0.051)。无论心理健康状况如何,戒烟最重要的预测因素是使用戒烟处方药。与非重度精神分裂症患者相比,家庭医生询问其戒烟动机、参考戒烟计划或为重度精神分裂症患者开戒烟药物的可能性显著降低。除了这些因素外,重度精神分裂症患者和非重度精神分裂症患者在戒烟动机、戒烟意图和戒断自我效能方面没有差异。没有戒烟的PWSMI患者更可能担心戒烟会如何影响他们的功能,以及他们如何度过不吸烟的时间。结论:重度精神分裂症患者与非重度精神分裂症患者具有相似的戒烟动机和戒烟意向。然而,由于家庭医生的支持减少和戒烟药物的使用减少,他们处于不利地位。努力推动实施戒烟治疗指南,将有助于促进残疾人士戒烟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
13.60%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Journal of Dual Diagnosis is a quarterly, international publication that focuses on the full spectrum of complexities regarding dual diagnosis. The co-occurrence of mental health and substance use disorders, or “dual diagnosis,” is one of the quintessential issues in behavioral health. Why do such high rates of co-occurrence exist? What does it tell us about risk profiles? How do these linked disorders affect people, their families, and the communities in which they live? What are the natural paths to recovery? What specific treatments are most helpful and how can new ones be developed? How can we enhance the implementation of evidence-based practices at clinical, administrative, and policy levels? How can we help clients to learn active recovery skills and adopt needed supports, clinicians to master new interventions, programs to implement effective services, and communities to foster healthy adjustment? The Journal addresses each of these perplexing challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信