When Musical Accompaniment Allows the Preferred Spatio-Temporal Pattern of Movement.

Sports medicine international open Pub Date : 2021-10-04 eCollection Date: 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1055/a-1553-7063
Analina Emmanouil, Elissavet Rousanoglou, Anastasia Georgaki, Konstantinos D Boudolos
{"title":"When Musical Accompaniment Allows the Preferred Spatio-Temporal Pattern of Movement.","authors":"Analina Emmanouil,&nbsp;Elissavet Rousanoglou,&nbsp;Anastasia Georgaki,&nbsp;Konstantinos D Boudolos","doi":"10.1055/a-1553-7063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A musical accompaniment is often used in movement coordination and stability exercise modalities, although considered obstructive for their fundament of preferred movement pace. This study examined if the rhythmic strength of musical excerpts used in movement coordination and exercise modalities allows the preferred spatio-temporal pattern of movement. Voluntary and spontaneous body sway (70 s) were tested (N=20 young women) in a non-musical (preferred) and two rhythmic strength (RS) musical conditions (Higher:HrRS, Lower:LrRS). The center of pressure trajectory was used for the body sway spatio-temporal characteristics (Kistler forceplate, 100 Hz). Statistics included paired t-tests between each musical condition and the non-musical one, as well as between musical conditions (p≤0.05). Results indicated no significant difference between the musical and the non-musical conditions (p>0.05). The HrRS differed significantly from LrRS only in the voluntary body sway, with increased sway duration (p=0.03), center of pressure path (p=0.04) and velocity (p=0.01). The findings provide evidence-based support for the rhythmic strength recommendations in movement coordination and stability exercise modalities. The HrRS to LrRS differences in voluntary body sway most possibly indicate that low-frequency musical features rather than just tempo and pulse clarity are also important.</p>","PeriodicalId":74857,"journal":{"name":"Sports medicine international open","volume":"5 3","pages":"E81-E90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b8/63/10-1055-a-1553-7063.PMC8500738.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports medicine international open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1553-7063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A musical accompaniment is often used in movement coordination and stability exercise modalities, although considered obstructive for their fundament of preferred movement pace. This study examined if the rhythmic strength of musical excerpts used in movement coordination and exercise modalities allows the preferred spatio-temporal pattern of movement. Voluntary and spontaneous body sway (70 s) were tested (N=20 young women) in a non-musical (preferred) and two rhythmic strength (RS) musical conditions (Higher:HrRS, Lower:LrRS). The center of pressure trajectory was used for the body sway spatio-temporal characteristics (Kistler forceplate, 100 Hz). Statistics included paired t-tests between each musical condition and the non-musical one, as well as between musical conditions (p≤0.05). Results indicated no significant difference between the musical and the non-musical conditions (p>0.05). The HrRS differed significantly from LrRS only in the voluntary body sway, with increased sway duration (p=0.03), center of pressure path (p=0.04) and velocity (p=0.01). The findings provide evidence-based support for the rhythmic strength recommendations in movement coordination and stability exercise modalities. The HrRS to LrRS differences in voluntary body sway most possibly indicate that low-frequency musical features rather than just tempo and pulse clarity are also important.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

当音乐伴奏允许首选的时空运动模式时。
音乐伴奏通常用于运动协调和稳定性锻炼模式,尽管被认为是他们首选运动速度的基础障碍。本研究考察了在运动协调和运动模式中使用的音乐节选的节奏强度是否允许首选的运动时空模式。在非音乐(首选)和两种节奏强度(RS)音乐条件(高:HrRS,低:LrRS)下测试了自愿和自发的身体摇摆(70秒)(N=20名年轻女性)。以压力轨迹中心作为身体摇摆的时空特征(Kistler力板,100 Hz)。各音乐条件与非音乐条件之间、音乐条件与非音乐条件之间进行配对t检验(p≤0.05)。结果显示,音乐组与非音乐组之间无显著差异(p>0.05)。HrRS与LrRS仅在自主体摇摆方面存在显著差异,摇摆持续时间(p=0.03)、压力路径中心(p=0.04)和速度(p=0.01)均有所增加。研究结果为运动协调性和稳定性运动模式的节奏力量推荐提供了证据支持。自主身体摇摆的HrRS和LrRS差异很可能表明低频音乐特征,而不仅仅是节奏和脉搏清晰度也很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信