An additional lysis procedure during arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint.

IF 2 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Keon-Mo Lee, Wan-Hee Jang, Myoung-Sang You, Bu-Kyu Lee
{"title":"An additional lysis procedure during arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint.","authors":"Keon-Mo Lee,&nbsp;Wan-Hee Jang,&nbsp;Myoung-Sang You,&nbsp;Bu-Kyu Lee","doi":"10.1186/s40902-021-00324-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is an easy, highly efficient, minimally invasive procedure for treating temporomandibular joint disorders (TMDs). However, in some cases of mouth opening limitation (MOL), routine arthrocentesis is ineffective due to severe fibrotic adhesion in the superior joint space of the TMJ. In this condition, mechanical lysis of the adhesions might be needed to resolve the MOL, as well as other symptoms, such as chronic pain. Currently, this can be achieved by arthroscopic surgery or open TMJ surgery. The objective of this study was to introduce and evaluate our trial of the adhesion lysis procedure during arthrocentesis of the TMJ using normal 18-gauge needles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, 40 patients with MOL due to disc derangement underwent conventional arthrocentesis at first and then physical detachment was conducted using the same needle. The change in maximum mouth opening (MMO) and the pain at the TMJ were recorded before, during, and after treatment according to our protocol. The mean increase in MMO after conventional arthrocentesis was 6.6 ± 4.2mm. The mean increase in MMO after the detachment procedure with the same needle was 4.2 ± 2.0 mm. The MMO in ten patients was significantly increased after the detachment procedure than after arthrocentesis alone. In all cases, the pain intensity in the TMJ significantly decreased over time, whereas the MMO increased over time. No adverse effect was observed in all joints during our observation periods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We confirmed that our simple lysis procedure with the same needle of the arthrocentesis of the TMJ could not only improve the MMO more than after a conventional arthrocentesis but also resolve severe adhesion of the joint space that was ineffective by conventional arthrocentesis. Although this additional lysis procedure is simple, it might reduce the number of cases of more invasive procedures such as arthroscopic surgery or open TMJ surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":18357,"journal":{"name":"Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"43 1","pages":"38"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8511201/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-021-00324-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is an easy, highly efficient, minimally invasive procedure for treating temporomandibular joint disorders (TMDs). However, in some cases of mouth opening limitation (MOL), routine arthrocentesis is ineffective due to severe fibrotic adhesion in the superior joint space of the TMJ. In this condition, mechanical lysis of the adhesions might be needed to resolve the MOL, as well as other symptoms, such as chronic pain. Currently, this can be achieved by arthroscopic surgery or open TMJ surgery. The objective of this study was to introduce and evaluate our trial of the adhesion lysis procedure during arthrocentesis of the TMJ using normal 18-gauge needles.

Results: In this study, 40 patients with MOL due to disc derangement underwent conventional arthrocentesis at first and then physical detachment was conducted using the same needle. The change in maximum mouth opening (MMO) and the pain at the TMJ were recorded before, during, and after treatment according to our protocol. The mean increase in MMO after conventional arthrocentesis was 6.6 ± 4.2mm. The mean increase in MMO after the detachment procedure with the same needle was 4.2 ± 2.0 mm. The MMO in ten patients was significantly increased after the detachment procedure than after arthrocentesis alone. In all cases, the pain intensity in the TMJ significantly decreased over time, whereas the MMO increased over time. No adverse effect was observed in all joints during our observation periods.

Conclusion: We confirmed that our simple lysis procedure with the same needle of the arthrocentesis of the TMJ could not only improve the MMO more than after a conventional arthrocentesis but also resolve severe adhesion of the joint space that was ineffective by conventional arthrocentesis. Although this additional lysis procedure is simple, it might reduce the number of cases of more invasive procedures such as arthroscopic surgery or open TMJ surgery.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

颞下颌关节置换术中附加的松解手术。
背景:颞下颌关节穿刺(TMJ)是一种简单、高效、微创的治疗颞下颌关节疾病(TMDs)的方法。然而,在一些开口受限(MOL)的病例中,由于TMJ上关节间隙严重的纤维化粘连,常规的关节穿刺是无效的。在这种情况下,可能需要机械溶解粘连来解决MOL,以及其他症状,如慢性疼痛。目前,这可以通过关节镜手术或开放TMJ手术来实现。本研究的目的是介绍和评估我们在使用普通18号针进行TMJ关节穿刺时粘连溶解的试验。结果:本研究对40例椎间盘脱位引起的MOL患者先行常规关节穿刺,再用同一根针进行物理脱离。根据我们的方案记录治疗前、治疗中和治疗后最大开口(MMO)和TMJ疼痛的变化。常规关节置换术后MMO平均增加6.6±4.2mm。同一根针脱离手术后,MMO平均增加4.2±2.0 mm。10例患者的MMO在脱离手术后比单纯关节穿刺后明显增加。在所有病例中,TMJ的疼痛强度随着时间的推移显著降低,而MMO则随着时间的推移而增加。在我们的观察期间,所有关节均未观察到不良反应。结论:与传统关节穿刺相比,我们采用同一根关节穿刺针进行简单的关节松解术,不仅可以改善关节间关节粘连,而且可以解决传统关节穿刺无法解决的关节间隙严重粘连问题。虽然这种额外的松解手术很简单,但它可能会减少更多侵入性手术的病例,如关节镜手术或开放TMJ手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信