Structural and functional motor-network disruptions predict selective action-concept deficits: Evidence from frontal lobe epilepsy

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Sebastian Moguilner , Agustina Birba , Daniel Fino , Roberto Isoardi , Celeste Huetagoyena , Raúl Otoya , Viviana Tirapu , Fabián Cremaschi , Lucas Sedeño , Agustín Ibáñez , Adolfo M. García
{"title":"Structural and functional motor-network disruptions predict selective action-concept deficits: Evidence from frontal lobe epilepsy","authors":"Sebastian Moguilner ,&nbsp;Agustina Birba ,&nbsp;Daniel Fino ,&nbsp;Roberto Isoardi ,&nbsp;Celeste Huetagoyena ,&nbsp;Raúl Otoya ,&nbsp;Viviana Tirapu ,&nbsp;Fabián Cremaschi ,&nbsp;Lucas Sedeño ,&nbsp;Agustín Ibáñez ,&nbsp;Adolfo M. García","doi":"10.1016/j.cortex.2021.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Built on neurodegenerative lesions models, the disrupted motor grounding hypothesis (DMGH) posits that motor-system alterations selectively impair action comprehension. However, major doubts remain concerning the dissociability, neural signatures, and etiological generalizability of such deficits. Few studies have compared action-concept outcomes between disorders affecting and sparing motor circuitry, and none has examined their multimodal network predictors via data-driven approaches. Here, we first assessed action- and object-concept processing in patients with frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE), patients with posterior cortex epilepsy (PCE), and healthy controls. Then, we examined structural and functional network signatures via </span>diffusion tensor imaging and resting-state connectivity measures. Finally, we used these measures to predict behavioral performance with an XGBoost machine learning regression algorithm. Relative to controls, FLE (but not PCE) patients exhibited selective action-concept deficits together with structural and functional abnormalities along motor networks. The XGBoost model reached a significantly large effect size only for action-concept outcomes in FLE, mainly predicted by structural (cortico-spinal tract, anterior thalamic radiation, uncinate fasciculus) and functional (M1-parietal/supramarginal connectivity) motor networks. These results extend the DMGH, suggesting that action-concept deficits are dissociable markers of frontal/motor (relative to posterior) disruptions, directly related to the structural and functional integrity of motor networks, and traceable beyond canonical movement disorders.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10758,"journal":{"name":"Cortex","volume":"144 ","pages":"Pages 43-55"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cortex","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010945221002823","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Built on neurodegenerative lesions models, the disrupted motor grounding hypothesis (DMGH) posits that motor-system alterations selectively impair action comprehension. However, major doubts remain concerning the dissociability, neural signatures, and etiological generalizability of such deficits. Few studies have compared action-concept outcomes between disorders affecting and sparing motor circuitry, and none has examined their multimodal network predictors via data-driven approaches. Here, we first assessed action- and object-concept processing in patients with frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE), patients with posterior cortex epilepsy (PCE), and healthy controls. Then, we examined structural and functional network signatures via diffusion tensor imaging and resting-state connectivity measures. Finally, we used these measures to predict behavioral performance with an XGBoost machine learning regression algorithm. Relative to controls, FLE (but not PCE) patients exhibited selective action-concept deficits together with structural and functional abnormalities along motor networks. The XGBoost model reached a significantly large effect size only for action-concept outcomes in FLE, mainly predicted by structural (cortico-spinal tract, anterior thalamic radiation, uncinate fasciculus) and functional (M1-parietal/supramarginal connectivity) motor networks. These results extend the DMGH, suggesting that action-concept deficits are dissociable markers of frontal/motor (relative to posterior) disruptions, directly related to the structural and functional integrity of motor networks, and traceable beyond canonical movement disorders.

结构和功能运动网络中断预测选择性动作概念缺陷:来自额叶癫痫的证据
基于神经退行性病变模型,运动基础中断假说(DMGH)假设运动系统的改变选择性地损害动作理解。然而,关于这些缺陷的可解离性、神经特征和病因普遍性,主要的疑问仍然存在。很少有研究比较影响和保留运动电路的疾病之间的动作概念结果,也没有研究通过数据驱动的方法检查其多模态网络预测因子。在这里,我们首先评估了额叶癫痫(FLE)患者、后皮层癫痫(PCE)患者和健康对照者的动作和物体概念加工。然后,我们通过扩散张量成像和静息状态连接测量来检查结构和功能网络特征。最后,我们使用XGBoost机器学习回归算法使用这些度量来预测行为表现。与对照组相比,FLE(而非PCE)患者表现出选择性动作概念缺陷以及运动网络的结构和功能异常。XGBoost模型仅对FLE的动作概念结果达到了显著的大效应量,主要通过结构(皮质-脊髓束、丘脑前辐射、钩侧束)和功能(m1 -顶叶/边缘上连接)运动网络预测。这些结果扩展了DMGH,表明动作概念缺陷是额叶/运动(相对于后叶)中断的可分离标记,与运动网络的结构和功能完整性直接相关,并且可以追溯到典型的运动障碍之外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cortex
Cortex 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
250
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: CORTEX is an international journal devoted to the study of cognition and of the relationship between the nervous system and mental processes, particularly as these are reflected in the behaviour of patients with acquired brain lesions, normal volunteers, children with typical and atypical development, and in the activation of brain regions and systems as recorded by functional neuroimaging techniques. It was founded in 1964 by Ennio De Renzi.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信