A patient-specific QA comparison between 2D and 3D diode arrays for single-lesion SRS and SBRT treatments.

IF 0.7 Q4 SURGERY
Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT Pub Date : 2021-01-01
Yongsook C Lee, Yongbok Kim
{"title":"A patient-specific QA comparison between 2D and 3D diode arrays for single-lesion SRS and SBRT treatments.","authors":"Yongsook C Lee,&nbsp;Yongbok Kim","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study is to compare patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) results between two dimensional (2D) diode (SRS MapCHECK<sup>®</sup>) and 3D diode (ArcCHECK<sup>®</sup>) arrays. Twenty-eight intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and 26 lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) clinical plans with a single lesion were selected and categorized into 4 groups: 20 SRS dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT) plans (Group A), 8 SRS volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans (Group B), 6 SBRT DCAT plans (Group C) and 20 SBRT VMAT plans (Group D). An individual field of each plan was delivered on SRS MapCHECK and ArcCHECK and QA analysis was performed using 4 gamma criteria of dose difference/distance-to-agreement of 3%/3 mm, 3%/2 mm, 2%/2 mm and 2%/1 mm. Statistical analysis was performed to compare PSQA results between the 2 QA devices. For all 4 groups and all 4 gamma criteria, average gamma passing rates were higher with SRS MapCHECK.</p>","PeriodicalId":16917,"journal":{"name":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","volume":"7 4","pages":"295-307"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8492049/pdf/rsbrt-7-307.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) results between two dimensional (2D) diode (SRS MapCHECK®) and 3D diode (ArcCHECK®) arrays. Twenty-eight intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and 26 lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) clinical plans with a single lesion were selected and categorized into 4 groups: 20 SRS dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT) plans (Group A), 8 SRS volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans (Group B), 6 SBRT DCAT plans (Group C) and 20 SBRT VMAT plans (Group D). An individual field of each plan was delivered on SRS MapCHECK and ArcCHECK and QA analysis was performed using 4 gamma criteria of dose difference/distance-to-agreement of 3%/3 mm, 3%/2 mm, 2%/2 mm and 2%/1 mm. Statistical analysis was performed to compare PSQA results between the 2 QA devices. For all 4 groups and all 4 gamma criteria, average gamma passing rates were higher with SRS MapCHECK.

2D和3D二极管阵列用于单病变SRS和SBRT治疗的患者特异性QA比较。
本研究的目的是比较二维(2D)二极管(SRS MapCHECK®)和三维二极管(ArcCHECK®)阵列之间的患者特异性质量保证(PSQA)结果。选取28例颅内立体定向放射治疗(SRS)临床方案和26例肺立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)单病灶临床方案,分为4组:20个SRS动态适形电弧治疗(DCAT)计划(A组),8个SRS体积调节电弧治疗(VMAT)计划(B组),6个SBRT DCAT计划(C组)和20个SBRT VMAT计划(D组)。每个计划在SRS MapCHECK和ArcCHECK上进行单独的场,并使用4个剂量差/距离-一致标准(3%/ 3mm, 3%/ 2mm, 2%/ 2mm和2%/ 1mm)进行QA分析。统计分析比较两种QA设备的PSQA结果。对于所有4组和所有4个伽玛标准,SRS MapCHECK的平均伽玛通过率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信