Neurological Soft Signs in Cannabis Use Disorder with or without Psychosis: A Comparative Study from India.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Journal of Dual Diagnosis Pub Date : 2021-10-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-05 DOI:10.1080/15504263.2021.1979887
Arpit Parmar, Rakesh Lal, Siddharth Sarkar, Yatan Pal Singh Balhara
{"title":"Neurological Soft Signs in Cannabis Use Disorder with or without Psychosis: A Comparative Study from India.","authors":"Arpit Parmar,&nbsp;Rakesh Lal,&nbsp;Siddharth Sarkar,&nbsp;Yatan Pal Singh Balhara","doi":"10.1080/15504263.2021.1979887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to assess and compare neurological soft signs in patients of cannabis use disorder (CUD) with and without co-occurring psychosis in a treatment-seeking sample.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 30 right-handed male subjects aged 18-65 years diagnosed with CUD (as per DSM-5) without any co-occurring psychiatric disorder in group I and those with co-occurring non-affective psychosis in group II. Group III consisted of 30 age and sex-matched, right-handed, healthy subjects with no psychiatric or medical conditions. Neurological Evaluation Scale (NES) was applied to measure neurological soft signs across the groups. We also used the Severity of Dependence Scale (in CUD with or without co-occurring non-affective psychosis groups) and Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms, Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale, Abnormal Involuntary Movements Scale, and Simpson Angus Scale (in CUD with co-occurring non-affective psychosis group) .</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our data suggested higher total NES mean scores in CUD with (20.53 ± 13.77) or without co-occurring non-affective psychosis groups (15.93 ± 9.86) as compared to healthy controls (6.20 ± 5.40) (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> = 23.12; <i>p</i> < .001). However, there were no differences between cannabis use disorder with or without co-occurring non-affective psychosis groups. The mean of subdomain scores of motor incoordination, sequencing of complex motor tasks, sensory integration, and others was significantly higher in CUD with or without co-occurring non-affective psychosis groups compared to healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Impairment in neurological soft signs is present in patients with CUD regardless of a co-occurring psychosis. Cannabinoids might be interacting with the brain circuits known to be involved in schizophrenia.</p>","PeriodicalId":46571,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2021.1979887","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess and compare neurological soft signs in patients of cannabis use disorder (CUD) with and without co-occurring psychosis in a treatment-seeking sample.

Methods: We included 30 right-handed male subjects aged 18-65 years diagnosed with CUD (as per DSM-5) without any co-occurring psychiatric disorder in group I and those with co-occurring non-affective psychosis in group II. Group III consisted of 30 age and sex-matched, right-handed, healthy subjects with no psychiatric or medical conditions. Neurological Evaluation Scale (NES) was applied to measure neurological soft signs across the groups. We also used the Severity of Dependence Scale (in CUD with or without co-occurring non-affective psychosis groups) and Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms, Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale, Abnormal Involuntary Movements Scale, and Simpson Angus Scale (in CUD with co-occurring non-affective psychosis group) .

Results: Our data suggested higher total NES mean scores in CUD with (20.53 ± 13.77) or without co-occurring non-affective psychosis groups (15.93 ± 9.86) as compared to healthy controls (6.20 ± 5.40) (χ2 = 23.12; p < .001). However, there were no differences between cannabis use disorder with or without co-occurring non-affective psychosis groups. The mean of subdomain scores of motor incoordination, sequencing of complex motor tasks, sensory integration, and others was significantly higher in CUD with or without co-occurring non-affective psychosis groups compared to healthy controls.

Conclusion: Impairment in neurological soft signs is present in patients with CUD regardless of a co-occurring psychosis. Cannabinoids might be interacting with the brain circuits known to be involved in schizophrenia.

伴有或不伴有精神病的大麻使用障碍的神经系统软症状:来自印度的比较研究。
目的:本研究的目的是评估和比较大麻使用障碍(CUD)患者在寻求治疗的样本中伴有和不伴有精神病的神经系统软体征。方法:我们纳入30名年龄在18-65岁的男性右利手受试者,诊断为CUD(根据DSM-5),无任何共发精神障碍,组I和组II共发非情感性精神病。第三组包括30名年龄和性别匹配、右撇子、没有精神或医疗状况的健康受试者。采用神经学评价量表(NES)测量各组神经学软征象。我们还使用了依赖严重程度量表(在合并或不合并非情感性精神病组中)和阳性症状评估量表、阴性症状评估量表、巴恩斯静坐症评定量表、异常不自主运动量表和辛普森安格斯量表(在合并非情感性精神病组中)。我们的数据显示,合并CUD的非情感性精神病组(20.53±13.77)或未合并非情感性精神病组(15.93±9.86)的总NES平均评分高于健康对照组(6.20±5.40)(χ2 = 23.12;结论:无论合并精神病与否,CUD患者均存在神经系统软体征损害。大麻素可能与已知与精神分裂症有关的大脑回路相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
13.60%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Journal of Dual Diagnosis is a quarterly, international publication that focuses on the full spectrum of complexities regarding dual diagnosis. The co-occurrence of mental health and substance use disorders, or “dual diagnosis,” is one of the quintessential issues in behavioral health. Why do such high rates of co-occurrence exist? What does it tell us about risk profiles? How do these linked disorders affect people, their families, and the communities in which they live? What are the natural paths to recovery? What specific treatments are most helpful and how can new ones be developed? How can we enhance the implementation of evidence-based practices at clinical, administrative, and policy levels? How can we help clients to learn active recovery skills and adopt needed supports, clinicians to master new interventions, programs to implement effective services, and communities to foster healthy adjustment? The Journal addresses each of these perplexing challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信