Barriers to Abortion in the Autonomy-Based Danish Legal Model.

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH LAW Pub Date : 2021-09-29 DOI:10.1163/15718093-bja10054

Janne Rothmar Herrmann, Annika Frida Petersen

引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2016, the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights adopted General Comment 22 on the right to sexual and reproductive health, which affirmed that states are obliged to adopt "appropriate legislative measures" to achieve the full realization of sexual and reproductive health and rights. It affirmed that the right to sexual and reproductive health is an integral part of the right to health and recognizes abortion services as a component part of the right to health. While a liberal legislation is in itself a step towards the realization of this obligation, in this article we explore a number of potential barriers to abortion access in an autonomy-based legal model using the Danish legal model as the case study.

查看原文本刊更多论文

基于自主权的丹麦法律模式中的堕胎障碍。

2016 年，经济、社会和文化权利委员会通过了关于性健康和生殖健康权利的第 22 号一般性意见，申明各国有义务采取 "适当的立法措施"，以充分实现性健康和生殖健康及权利。它申明性健康和生殖健康权是健康权的一个组成部分，并承认堕胎服务是健康权的一个组成部分。虽然自由立法本身就是朝着实现这一义务迈出的一步，但在本文中，我们以丹麦的法律模式为案例研究，探讨了在基于自治的法律模式中获得堕胎服务的一些潜在障碍。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH LAW LAW-

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The European Journal of Jewish Studies (EJJS) is the Journal of the European Association for Jewish Studies (EAJS). Its main purpose is to publish high-quality research articles, essays and shorter contributions on all aspects of Jewish Studies. Submissions are all double blind peer-reviewed. Additionally, EJJS seeks to inform its readers on current developments in Jewish Studies: it carries comprehensive review-essays on specific topics, trends and debated questions, as well as regular book-reviews. A further section carries reports on conferences, symposia, and descriptions of research projects in every area of Jewish Studies.