Marina L de Albuquerque, Zelia Correa, André Messias, Rodrigo Jorge
{"title":"Decreased Retinal Sensitivity Overlying Choroidal Nevi.","authors":"Marina L de Albuquerque, Zelia Correa, André Messias, Rodrigo Jorge","doi":"10.1159/000515561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To report retinal function findings on the choroidal nevus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective descriptive case series of 7 patients (<i>n</i> = 7 eyes) presenting a melanocytic choroidal lesion consistent with choroidal nevus and no other ocular disease. Baseline evaluation included measurement of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), color and near-infrared fundus pictures, and spectral-domain OCT (Heidelberg Engineering). Retinal function was tested with microperimetry (MAIA; CenterVUE, Padova) using a standard grid (µP1) and a linear grid (µP2) that distribute test points on retinal areas that overlaid the choroidal lesion as well as lesion-free areas equidistantly to the fovea in 3 parallel lines. mfERG was performed following the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV) recommendation using a 61-hexyagon protocol.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BCVA was 20/25 (0.1 logMAR) or better in all 7 eyes. Microperimetry showed central stable fixation on all eyes, with mean ± SE sensitivity threshold significantly decreased on retinal areas overlaying the lesions (µP1): 21.8 ± 0.6 dB versus 25.2 ± 0.9 dB on nonaffected retinal areas (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Sensitivity was also decreased on µP2: 23.7 ± 0.2 dB for areas overlying the nevi and 25.7 ± 0.3 dB for the nonaffected retina (<i>p</i> < 0.001). mfERG responses showed no focal amplitude or implicit-time changes on the retina in the topographical region corresponding to the nevus for all patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results indicate that choroidal nevi may cause significant retinal sensitivity impairment, as shown by microperimetry, but preserved mfERG response indicates that the retinal function may be only partially impaired.</p>","PeriodicalId":19434,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Oncology and Pathology","volume":"7 4","pages":"287-293"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8443948/pdf/oop-0007-0287.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocular Oncology and Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000515561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To report retinal function findings on the choroidal nevus.
Methods: Prospective descriptive case series of 7 patients (n = 7 eyes) presenting a melanocytic choroidal lesion consistent with choroidal nevus and no other ocular disease. Baseline evaluation included measurement of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), color and near-infrared fundus pictures, and spectral-domain OCT (Heidelberg Engineering). Retinal function was tested with microperimetry (MAIA; CenterVUE, Padova) using a standard grid (µP1) and a linear grid (µP2) that distribute test points on retinal areas that overlaid the choroidal lesion as well as lesion-free areas equidistantly to the fovea in 3 parallel lines. mfERG was performed following the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV) recommendation using a 61-hexyagon protocol.
Results: BCVA was 20/25 (0.1 logMAR) or better in all 7 eyes. Microperimetry showed central stable fixation on all eyes, with mean ± SE sensitivity threshold significantly decreased on retinal areas overlaying the lesions (µP1): 21.8 ± 0.6 dB versus 25.2 ± 0.9 dB on nonaffected retinal areas (p < 0.001). Sensitivity was also decreased on µP2: 23.7 ± 0.2 dB for areas overlying the nevi and 25.7 ± 0.3 dB for the nonaffected retina (p < 0.001). mfERG responses showed no focal amplitude or implicit-time changes on the retina in the topographical region corresponding to the nevus for all patients.
Conclusion: Our results indicate that choroidal nevi may cause significant retinal sensitivity impairment, as shown by microperimetry, but preserved mfERG response indicates that the retinal function may be only partially impaired.