Exploring the trajectories of highly skilled migration law and policy in Japan and the UK.

IF 4.3 2区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
Comparative Migration Studies Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-27 DOI:10.1186/s40878-021-00251-3
Daisuke Wakisaka, Paul James Cardwell
{"title":"Exploring the trajectories of highly skilled migration law and policy in Japan and the UK.","authors":"Daisuke Wakisaka,&nbsp;Paul James Cardwell","doi":"10.1186/s40878-021-00251-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Japan and the UK appear to have few commonalities in terms of their history of and approach to migration law and policy. However, strong similarities in their contemporary approaches can be detected. Migration sits at the very top of the national political agendas and both have undertaken successive, major policy reforms over the past decade. Both have governments publicly committed to policies to attract 'highly skilled' migrants, with a restrictive approach towards 'unskilled' migrants. This article draws out the similarities and differences of migration law and policy in Japan and the UK via their respective legislative structures and policy trajectories on highly skilled migration. The article argues that Japan and the UK promote a market-driven model which enables highly skilled migration to be 'sold' to publics believed to be hostile to increased migration. Yet, the rapid changes in policy and revising of applicable rules often prevents the successful recruitment of highly skilled migrants to both countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":37051,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Migration Studies","volume":" ","pages":"43"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8475341/pdf/","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Migration Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-021-00251-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Japan and the UK appear to have few commonalities in terms of their history of and approach to migration law and policy. However, strong similarities in their contemporary approaches can be detected. Migration sits at the very top of the national political agendas and both have undertaken successive, major policy reforms over the past decade. Both have governments publicly committed to policies to attract 'highly skilled' migrants, with a restrictive approach towards 'unskilled' migrants. This article draws out the similarities and differences of migration law and policy in Japan and the UK via their respective legislative structures and policy trajectories on highly skilled migration. The article argues that Japan and the UK promote a market-driven model which enables highly skilled migration to be 'sold' to publics believed to be hostile to increased migration. Yet, the rapid changes in policy and revising of applicable rules often prevents the successful recruitment of highly skilled migrants to both countries.

探索日本和英国高技能移民法律和政策的发展轨迹。
在移民法律和政策的历史和方法方面,日本和英国似乎没有什么共同点。然而,在他们当代的方法中可以发现强烈的相似性。移民问题是国家政治议程的重中之重,在过去十年中,两国都进行了连续的重大政策改革。这两个国家的政府都公开承诺采取政策吸引“高技术”移民,对“非技术”移民采取限制性措施。本文通过日本和英国在高技能移民方面的立法结构和政策轨迹,得出了两国移民法律和政策的异同。这篇文章认为,日本和英国推行的是一种市场驱动的模式,这种模式使高技能移民能够被“出售”给那些被认为对移民增加持敌对态度的公众。然而,政策的迅速变化和适用规则的修订往往阻碍了两国成功招募高技能移民。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Comparative Migration Studies
Comparative Migration Studies Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
8.60%
发文量
47
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信