Biased Face Recognition Technology Used by Government: A Problem for Liberal Democracy.

Philosophy & Technology Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-25 DOI:10.1007/s13347-021-00478-z
Michael Gentzel
{"title":"Biased Face Recognition Technology Used by Government: A Problem for Liberal Democracy.","authors":"Michael Gentzel","doi":"10.1007/s13347-021-00478-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper presents a novel philosophical analysis of the problem of law enforcement's use of biased face recognition technology (FRT) in liberal democracies. FRT programs used by law enforcement in identifying crime suspects are substantially more error-prone on facial images depicting darker skin tones and females as compared to facial images depicting Caucasian males. This bias can lead to citizens being wrongfully investigated by police along racial and gender lines. The author develops and defends \"A Liberal Argument Against Biased FRT,\" which concludes that law enforcement use of biased FRT is inconsistent with the classical liberal requirement that government treat all citizens equally before the law. Two objections to this argument are considered and shown to be unsound. The author concludes by suggesting that equality before the law should be preserved while the problem of machine bias ought to be resolved before FRT and other types of artificial intelligence (AI) are deployed by governments in liberal democracies.</p>","PeriodicalId":513391,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy & Technology","volume":"34 4","pages":"1639-1663"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8475322/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00478-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper presents a novel philosophical analysis of the problem of law enforcement's use of biased face recognition technology (FRT) in liberal democracies. FRT programs used by law enforcement in identifying crime suspects are substantially more error-prone on facial images depicting darker skin tones and females as compared to facial images depicting Caucasian males. This bias can lead to citizens being wrongfully investigated by police along racial and gender lines. The author develops and defends "A Liberal Argument Against Biased FRT," which concludes that law enforcement use of biased FRT is inconsistent with the classical liberal requirement that government treat all citizens equally before the law. Two objections to this argument are considered and shown to be unsound. The author concludes by suggesting that equality before the law should be preserved while the problem of machine bias ought to be resolved before FRT and other types of artificial intelligence (AI) are deployed by governments in liberal democracies.

政府使用的有偏见的人脸识别技术:自由民主的问题。
本文对自由民主国家执法部门使用有偏见的人脸识别技术(FRT)的问题进行了新颖的哲学分析。与白人男性的面部图像相比,执法部门在识别犯罪嫌疑人时使用的FRT程序在识别深色肤色和女性的面部图像时更容易出错。这种偏见可能导致警察根据种族和性别错误地调查公民。作者发展并捍卫了“反对有偏见的FRT的自由主义论点”,其结论是,执法部门使用有偏见的FRT与政府在法律面前平等对待所有公民的古典自由主义要求不一致。对这一论点的两个反对意见被认为是不合理的。作者最后建议,在自由民主国家的政府部署FRT和其他类型的人工智能(AI)之前,应该保留法律面前的平等,而机器偏见的问题应该得到解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信