Mental health care integration and primary care patient experience in the Veterans Health Administration

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Lucinda B. Leung , Danielle Rose , Rong Guo , Catherine E. Brayton , Lisa V. Rubenstein , Susan Stockdale
{"title":"Mental health care integration and primary care patient experience in the Veterans Health Administration","authors":"Lucinda B. Leung ,&nbsp;Danielle Rose ,&nbsp;Rong Guo ,&nbsp;Catherine E. Brayton ,&nbsp;Lisa V. Rubenstein ,&nbsp;Susan Stockdale","doi":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2021.100587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Mental health specialists and care managers facilitate comprehensive care provision within medical homes. Despite implementation challenges, mental health integration is thought to improve patient-centered primary care.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To examine the relationship between primary care patient experience and mental health integration.</p></div><div><h3>Research design</h3><p>Cross-sectional surveys from 168 primary care clinicians (PCPs) (n = 226) matched with assigned patients’ surveys (n = 1734) in one Veterans Health Administration (VA) region, fiscal years 2012–2013. Multilevel regression models examined patient experience and mental health integration, adjusting for patient and PCP characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Measures</h3><p>Patient experience outcomes were (1) experience with PCP and (2) receipt of comprehensive care, such as talked about “stress”. Independent variables represented mental health integration— (1) PCP-rated communication with mental health and (2) proportion of clinic patients who saw integrated specialists.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>50% and 43% of patients rated their PCPs 10/10 and reported receiving comprehensive care, respectively. Neither patient experience or receipt of comprehensive care was significantly associated with PCP's ratings of communication with mental health, nor with proportion of clinic patients who saw integrated specialists. Among a subsample of patients who rated their mental health as poor/fair, however, we detected an association between proportion of clinic patients who saw integrated specialists and patient experience (odds ratio = 1.05, 95% confidence interval = 1.01–1.09, p = .01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>No association was observed between mental health integration and primary care patients’ reported care experiences, but a significant association existed among patients who reported poor/fair mental health. More research is needed to understand patient experiences with regard to care model implementation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29963,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","volume":"9 4","pages":"Article 100587"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213076421000701","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Mental health specialists and care managers facilitate comprehensive care provision within medical homes. Despite implementation challenges, mental health integration is thought to improve patient-centered primary care.

Objectives

To examine the relationship between primary care patient experience and mental health integration.

Research design

Cross-sectional surveys from 168 primary care clinicians (PCPs) (n = 226) matched with assigned patients’ surveys (n = 1734) in one Veterans Health Administration (VA) region, fiscal years 2012–2013. Multilevel regression models examined patient experience and mental health integration, adjusting for patient and PCP characteristics.

Measures

Patient experience outcomes were (1) experience with PCP and (2) receipt of comprehensive care, such as talked about “stress”. Independent variables represented mental health integration— (1) PCP-rated communication with mental health and (2) proportion of clinic patients who saw integrated specialists.

Results

50% and 43% of patients rated their PCPs 10/10 and reported receiving comprehensive care, respectively. Neither patient experience or receipt of comprehensive care was significantly associated with PCP's ratings of communication with mental health, nor with proportion of clinic patients who saw integrated specialists. Among a subsample of patients who rated their mental health as poor/fair, however, we detected an association between proportion of clinic patients who saw integrated specialists and patient experience (odds ratio = 1.05, 95% confidence interval = 1.01–1.09, p = .01).

Conclusions

No association was observed between mental health integration and primary care patients’ reported care experiences, but a significant association existed among patients who reported poor/fair mental health. More research is needed to understand patient experiences with regard to care model implementation.

退伍军人健康管理局的精神卫生保健整合和初级保健患者经验
心理健康专家和护理管理人员促进在医疗院里提供全面的护理。尽管在实施方面存在挑战,但人们认为精神卫生整合可以改善以患者为中心的初级保健。目的探讨初级保健患者体验与心理健康整合的关系。研究设计对2012-2013财政年度退伍军人健康管理局(VA)地区168名初级保健临床医生(pcp) (n = 226)的横断面调查与指定患者的调查(n = 1734)相匹配。多水平回归模型检验了患者体验和心理健康整合,调整了患者和PCP特征。测量患者体验结果为(1)PCP体验和(2)接受综合护理,如谈论“压力”。自变量代表心理健康整合——(1)pcp评价的心理健康沟通和(2)门诊患者看综合专家的比例。结果50%和43%的患者对pcp评分为10/10,并报告接受了全面护理。患者经历或接受综合护理与PCP的心理健康沟通评分没有显著相关性,也与门诊患者看综合专家的比例没有显著相关性。然而,在将自己的心理健康评价为差/一般的患者的子样本中,我们发现就诊综合专家的门诊患者比例与患者体验之间存在关联(优势比= 1.05,95%置信区间= 1.01-1.09,p = 0.01)。结论心理健康整合与初级保健患者报告的护理经历无相关性,但在报告心理健康差/一般的患者中存在显著相关性。需要更多的研究来了解患者在护理模式实施方面的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: HealthCare: The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation is a quarterly journal. The journal promotes cutting edge research on innovation in healthcare delivery, including improvements in systems, processes, management, and applied information technology. The journal welcomes submissions of original research articles, case studies capturing "policy to practice" or "implementation of best practices", commentaries, and critical reviews of relevant novel programs and products. The scope of the journal includes topics directly related to delivering healthcare, such as: ● Care redesign ● Applied health IT ● Payment innovation ● Managerial innovation ● Quality improvement (QI) research ● New training and education models ● Comparative delivery innovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信