Lucinda B. Leung , Danielle Rose , Rong Guo , Catherine E. Brayton , Lisa V. Rubenstein , Susan Stockdale
{"title":"Mental health care integration and primary care patient experience in the Veterans Health Administration","authors":"Lucinda B. Leung , Danielle Rose , Rong Guo , Catherine E. Brayton , Lisa V. Rubenstein , Susan Stockdale","doi":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2021.100587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Mental health specialists and care managers facilitate comprehensive care provision within medical homes. Despite implementation challenges, mental health integration is thought to improve patient-centered primary care.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To examine the relationship between primary care patient experience and mental health integration.</p></div><div><h3>Research design</h3><p>Cross-sectional surveys from 168 primary care clinicians (PCPs) (n = 226) matched with assigned patients’ surveys (n = 1734) in one Veterans Health Administration (VA) region, fiscal years 2012–2013. Multilevel regression models examined patient experience and mental health integration, adjusting for patient and PCP characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Measures</h3><p>Patient experience outcomes were (1) experience with PCP and (2) receipt of comprehensive care, such as talked about “stress”. Independent variables represented mental health integration— (1) PCP-rated communication with mental health and (2) proportion of clinic patients who saw integrated specialists.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>50% and 43% of patients rated their PCPs 10/10 and reported receiving comprehensive care, respectively. Neither patient experience or receipt of comprehensive care was significantly associated with PCP's ratings of communication with mental health, nor with proportion of clinic patients who saw integrated specialists. Among a subsample of patients who rated their mental health as poor/fair, however, we detected an association between proportion of clinic patients who saw integrated specialists and patient experience (odds ratio = 1.05, 95% confidence interval = 1.01–1.09, p = .01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>No association was observed between mental health integration and primary care patients’ reported care experiences, but a significant association existed among patients who reported poor/fair mental health. More research is needed to understand patient experiences with regard to care model implementation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29963,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","volume":"9 4","pages":"Article 100587"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213076421000701","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Mental health specialists and care managers facilitate comprehensive care provision within medical homes. Despite implementation challenges, mental health integration is thought to improve patient-centered primary care.
Objectives
To examine the relationship between primary care patient experience and mental health integration.
Research design
Cross-sectional surveys from 168 primary care clinicians (PCPs) (n = 226) matched with assigned patients’ surveys (n = 1734) in one Veterans Health Administration (VA) region, fiscal years 2012–2013. Multilevel regression models examined patient experience and mental health integration, adjusting for patient and PCP characteristics.
Measures
Patient experience outcomes were (1) experience with PCP and (2) receipt of comprehensive care, such as talked about “stress”. Independent variables represented mental health integration— (1) PCP-rated communication with mental health and (2) proportion of clinic patients who saw integrated specialists.
Results
50% and 43% of patients rated their PCPs 10/10 and reported receiving comprehensive care, respectively. Neither patient experience or receipt of comprehensive care was significantly associated with PCP's ratings of communication with mental health, nor with proportion of clinic patients who saw integrated specialists. Among a subsample of patients who rated their mental health as poor/fair, however, we detected an association between proportion of clinic patients who saw integrated specialists and patient experience (odds ratio = 1.05, 95% confidence interval = 1.01–1.09, p = .01).
Conclusions
No association was observed between mental health integration and primary care patients’ reported care experiences, but a significant association existed among patients who reported poor/fair mental health. More research is needed to understand patient experiences with regard to care model implementation.
期刊介绍:
HealthCare: The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation is a quarterly journal. The journal promotes cutting edge research on innovation in healthcare delivery, including improvements in systems, processes, management, and applied information technology.
The journal welcomes submissions of original research articles, case studies capturing "policy to practice" or "implementation of best practices", commentaries, and critical reviews of relevant novel programs and products. The scope of the journal includes topics directly related to delivering healthcare, such as:
● Care redesign
● Applied health IT
● Payment innovation
● Managerial innovation
● Quality improvement (QI) research
● New training and education models
● Comparative delivery innovation