PLAG1 Immunohistochemical Staining Is a Surrogate Marker for PLAG1 Fusions in Lipoblastomas.

IF 1.3
Mikako Warren, Nishant Tiwari, Sabrina Sy, Gordana Raca, Ryan J Schmidt, Bruce Pawel
{"title":"PLAG1 Immunohistochemical Staining Is a Surrogate Marker for <i>PLAG1</i> Fusions in Lipoblastomas.","authors":"Mikako Warren,&nbsp;Nishant Tiwari,&nbsp;Sabrina Sy,&nbsp;Gordana Raca,&nbsp;Ryan J Schmidt,&nbsp;Bruce Pawel","doi":"10.1177/10935266211043366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The hallmark of lipoblastoma is a PLAG1 fusion. PLAG1 protein overexpression has been reported in sporadic PLAG1-rearranged lipoblastomas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated the utility of PLAG1 immunohistochemical staining (IHC) in 34 pediatric lipomatous tumors, correlating the results with histology and conventional cytogenetics, FISH and/or next generation sequencing (NGS) results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 24 lipoblastomas, divided into 2 groups designated as \"Lipoblastoma 1\" with both lipoblastoma histology and PLAG1 rearrangement (n = 16) and \"Lipoblastoma 2\" with lipoblastoma histology but without PLAG1 cytogenetic rearrangement (n = 8), and 10 lipomas with neither lipoblastoma histology nor a PLAG1 rearrangement. Using the presence of a fusion as the \"gold standard\" for diagnosing lipoblastoma (Lipoblastoma 1), the sensitivity of PLAG1 IHC was 94%. Using histologic features alone (Lipoblastoma 1 + 2), the sensitivity was 96%. Specificity, as defined by the ability to distinguish lipoma from lipoblastoma, was 100%, as there were no false positives in the lipoma group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cytogenetics/molecular testing is expensive and may not be ideal for detecting PLAG1 fusions because PLAG1 fusions are often cytogenetically cryptic and NGS panels may not include all partner genes. PLAG1 IHC is an inexpensive surrogate marker of PLAG1 fusions and may be useful in distinguishing lipoblastomas from lipomas.</p>","PeriodicalId":520743,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric and developmental pathology : the official journal of the Society for Pediatric Pathology and the Paediatric Pathology Society","volume":" ","pages":"134-140"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric and developmental pathology : the official journal of the Society for Pediatric Pathology and the Paediatric Pathology Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10935266211043366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The hallmark of lipoblastoma is a PLAG1 fusion. PLAG1 protein overexpression has been reported in sporadic PLAG1-rearranged lipoblastomas.

Methods: We evaluated the utility of PLAG1 immunohistochemical staining (IHC) in 34 pediatric lipomatous tumors, correlating the results with histology and conventional cytogenetics, FISH and/or next generation sequencing (NGS) results.

Results: The study included 24 lipoblastomas, divided into 2 groups designated as "Lipoblastoma 1" with both lipoblastoma histology and PLAG1 rearrangement (n = 16) and "Lipoblastoma 2" with lipoblastoma histology but without PLAG1 cytogenetic rearrangement (n = 8), and 10 lipomas with neither lipoblastoma histology nor a PLAG1 rearrangement. Using the presence of a fusion as the "gold standard" for diagnosing lipoblastoma (Lipoblastoma 1), the sensitivity of PLAG1 IHC was 94%. Using histologic features alone (Lipoblastoma 1 + 2), the sensitivity was 96%. Specificity, as defined by the ability to distinguish lipoma from lipoblastoma, was 100%, as there were no false positives in the lipoma group.

Conclusions: Cytogenetics/molecular testing is expensive and may not be ideal for detecting PLAG1 fusions because PLAG1 fusions are often cytogenetically cryptic and NGS panels may not include all partner genes. PLAG1 IHC is an inexpensive surrogate marker of PLAG1 fusions and may be useful in distinguishing lipoblastomas from lipomas.

PLAG1免疫组织化学染色是脂肪母细胞瘤中PLAG1融合的替代标志物。
背景:脂肪母细胞瘤的标志是PLAG1融合。PLAG1蛋白在散发性PLAG1重排的脂肪母细胞瘤中有过表达的报道。方法:我们评估了PLAG1免疫组织化学染色(IHC)在34例儿童脂肪瘤中的应用,并将结果与组织学和常规细胞遗传学、FISH和/或下一代测序(NGS)结果相关联。结果:本研究纳入24例成脂细胞瘤,分为两组:既有成脂细胞瘤组织学,也有PLAG1重排的“成脂细胞瘤1”组(n = 16);既有成脂细胞瘤组织学,但没有PLAG1细胞遗传学重排的“成脂细胞瘤2”组(n = 8);使用融合作为诊断脂肪母细胞瘤(lipoblastoma 1)的“金标准”,PLAG1 IHC的敏感性为94%。仅使用组织学特征(脂肪母细胞瘤1 + 2),敏感性为96%。特异性,根据区分脂肪瘤和脂肪母细胞瘤的能力来定义,为100%,因为脂肪瘤组中没有假阳性。结论:细胞遗传学/分子检测是昂贵的,并且可能不是检测PLAG1融合的理想方法,因为PLAG1融合通常是细胞遗传学上隐式的,并且NGS面板可能不包括所有的伴侣基因。PLAG1 IHC是一种廉价的PLAG1融合物的替代标记物,可用于区分成脂细胞瘤和脂肪瘤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信