Detection of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patient Urine Samples by Prototype and Commercial Test Strips for DOACs - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Andrea Martini, Job Harenberg, Rupert Bauersachs, Jan Beyer-Westendorf, Mark Crowther, Jonathan Douxfils, Ismail Elalamy, Christel Weiss, Svetlana Hetjens
{"title":"Detection of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patient Urine Samples by Prototype and Commercial Test Strips for DOACs - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Andrea Martini,&nbsp;Job Harenberg,&nbsp;Rupert Bauersachs,&nbsp;Jan Beyer-Westendorf,&nbsp;Mark Crowther,&nbsp;Jonathan Douxfils,&nbsp;Ismail Elalamy,&nbsp;Christel Weiss,&nbsp;Svetlana Hetjens","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1732437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The DOAC Dipstick accurately detects the presence or absence of factor Xa (DXI) and thrombin inhibitor (DTI) classes of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients' urine samples on DOAC treatment. The aim of the study was to systematically review the literature and compare the performance of prototype and commercial test strips with a meta-analysis. A systematic literature search of electronic databases PubMed (MEDLINE) and Cochrane Library was performed. Heterogeneity between studies was calculated using the Chi-squared test and the I <sup>2</sup> index. A random effects model was used to pool data to compare the performance of prototype and commercial test strips. Using PRISMA reporting guidelines, four of 1,081 publications were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis: three reporting on prototype (DXI <i>n</i>  = 658, DTI <i>n</i>  = 586) and one on commercial test strips (DXI <i>n</i>  = 451, DTI <i>n</i>  = 429). Sensitivity and specificity of DXI and DTI detection did not differ significantly between the prototype and commercial test strips. Odds ratios were 0.718 and 0.365 for sensitivity and 1.211 and 1.072 for specificity of DXI and DTI (p-values between 0.3334 and 1.000), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity values for DXI were 0.968 ( <i>p</i>  = 0.1290, I <sup>2</sup> 47.1%) and 0.979 ( <i>p</i>  = 0.1965, I <sup>2</sup> 35.9%), and for DTI 0.993 ( <i>p</i>  = 0.1870, I <sup>2</sup> 37.5%) and 0.993 ( <i>p</i>  = 0.7380, I <sup>2</sup> 0%), respectively. Prototype and commercial DOAC test strips did not differ in their ability to detect DXI and DTI in patient urine samples. This supports the confidence in use of the DOAC Dipstick test, although it needs to be validated in specific patient populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":22238,"journal":{"name":"TH Open: Companion Journal to Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":"5 3","pages":"e438-e448"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8463133/pdf/","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TH Open: Companion Journal to Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1732437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The DOAC Dipstick accurately detects the presence or absence of factor Xa (DXI) and thrombin inhibitor (DTI) classes of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients' urine samples on DOAC treatment. The aim of the study was to systematically review the literature and compare the performance of prototype and commercial test strips with a meta-analysis. A systematic literature search of electronic databases PubMed (MEDLINE) and Cochrane Library was performed. Heterogeneity between studies was calculated using the Chi-squared test and the I 2 index. A random effects model was used to pool data to compare the performance of prototype and commercial test strips. Using PRISMA reporting guidelines, four of 1,081 publications were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis: three reporting on prototype (DXI n  = 658, DTI n  = 586) and one on commercial test strips (DXI n  = 451, DTI n  = 429). Sensitivity and specificity of DXI and DTI detection did not differ significantly between the prototype and commercial test strips. Odds ratios were 0.718 and 0.365 for sensitivity and 1.211 and 1.072 for specificity of DXI and DTI (p-values between 0.3334 and 1.000), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity values for DXI were 0.968 ( p  = 0.1290, I 2 47.1%) and 0.979 ( p  = 0.1965, I 2 35.9%), and for DTI 0.993 ( p  = 0.1870, I 2 37.5%) and 0.993 ( p  = 0.7380, I 2 0%), respectively. Prototype and commercial DOAC test strips did not differ in their ability to detect DXI and DTI in patient urine samples. This supports the confidence in use of the DOAC Dipstick test, although it needs to be validated in specific patient populations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

用DOACs的原型试纸和商业试纸检测患者尿液样本中的直接口服抗凝剂——系统评价和荟萃分析。
DOAC试纸准确检测直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)患者尿液样本中Xa因子(DXI)和凝血酶抑制剂(DTI)类别的存在或缺失。本研究的目的是系统地回顾文献,并通过荟萃分析比较原型试纸和商业试纸的性能。系统检索电子数据库PubMed (MEDLINE)和Cochrane Library的文献。使用卡方检验和i2指数计算研究间的异质性。采用随机效应模型汇集数据,比较了原型试纸和商业试纸的性能。使用PRISMA报告指南,1,081篇出版物中有4篇有资格纳入荟萃分析:3篇关于原型(DXI n = 658, DTI n = 586)和1篇关于商业试纸(DXI n = 451, DTI n = 429)。DXI和DTI检测的敏感性和特异性在原型和商业试纸之间没有显著差异。DXI和DTI的敏感性优势比分别为0.718和0.365,特异性优势比分别为1.211和1.072 (p值在0.3334 ~ 1.000之间)。DXI的敏感性和特异性分别为0.968 (p = 0.1290, i2 47.1%)和0.979 (p = 0.1965, i2 35.9%), DTI的敏感性和特异性分别为0.993 (p = 0.1870, i2 37.5%)和0.993 (p = 0.7380, i2 0%)。原型和商业DOAC试纸在检测患者尿液样本中的DXI和DTI的能力上没有差异。这支持了使用DOAC Dipstick测试的信心,尽管它需要在特定的患者群体中进行验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信