Comparable reliability and acceptability of telepsychiatry and face-to-face psychiatric assessments in the emergency room setting.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Moises Bistre, Alzbeta Juven-Wetzler, Daniel Argo, Igor Barash, Gregory Katz, Ronen Teplitz, Muhamad-Musa Said, Yoav Kohn, Omer Linkovski, Renana Eitan
{"title":"Comparable reliability and acceptability of telepsychiatry and face-to-face psychiatric assessments in the emergency room setting.","authors":"Moises Bistre,&nbsp;Alzbeta Juven-Wetzler,&nbsp;Daniel Argo,&nbsp;Igor Barash,&nbsp;Gregory Katz,&nbsp;Ronen Teplitz,&nbsp;Muhamad-Musa Said,&nbsp;Yoav Kohn,&nbsp;Omer Linkovski,&nbsp;Renana Eitan","doi":"10.1080/13651501.2021.1979586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to compare the reliability and acceptability of psychiatric interviews using telepsychiatry and face-to-face modalities in the emergency room setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective observational feasibility study, psychiatric patients (<i>n</i> = 38) who presented in emergency rooms between April and June 2020, went through face-to-face and videoconference telepsychiatry interviews in a non-randomised varying order. Interviewers and a senior psychiatry resident who observed both interviews determined diagnosis, recommended disposition and indication for involuntary admission. Patients and psychiatrists completed acceptability post-assessment surveys.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Agreement between raters on recommended disposition and indication for involuntary admission as measured by Cohen's kappa was 'strong' to 'almost perfect' (0.84/0.81, 0.95/0.87 and 0.89/0.94 for face-to-face vs. telepsychiatry, observer vs. face-to-face and observer vs. telepsychiatry, respectively). Partial agreement between the raters on diagnosis was 'strong' (Cohen's kappa of 0.81, 0.85 and 0.85 for face-to-face vs. telepsychiatry, observer vs. face-to-face and observer vs. telepsychiatry, respectively).Psychiatrists' and patients' satisfaction rates, and psychiatrists' perceived certainty rates, were comparably high in both face-to-face and telepsychiatry groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Telepsychiatry is a reliable and acceptable alternative to face-to-face psychiatric assessments in the emergency room setting. Implementing telepsychiatry may improve the quality and accessibility of mental health services.Key pointsTelepsychiatry and face-to-face psychiatric assessments in the emergency room setting have comparable reliability.Patients and providers report a comparable high level of satisfaction with telepsychiatry and face-to-face modalities in the emergency room setting.Providers report a comparable level of perceived certainty in their clinical decisions based on telepsychiatry and face-to-face psychiatric assessments in the emergency room setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":14351,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice","volume":"26 3","pages":"228-233"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13651501.2021.1979586","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to compare the reliability and acceptability of psychiatric interviews using telepsychiatry and face-to-face modalities in the emergency room setting.

Methods: In this prospective observational feasibility study, psychiatric patients (n = 38) who presented in emergency rooms between April and June 2020, went through face-to-face and videoconference telepsychiatry interviews in a non-randomised varying order. Interviewers and a senior psychiatry resident who observed both interviews determined diagnosis, recommended disposition and indication for involuntary admission. Patients and psychiatrists completed acceptability post-assessment surveys.

Results: Agreement between raters on recommended disposition and indication for involuntary admission as measured by Cohen's kappa was 'strong' to 'almost perfect' (0.84/0.81, 0.95/0.87 and 0.89/0.94 for face-to-face vs. telepsychiatry, observer vs. face-to-face and observer vs. telepsychiatry, respectively). Partial agreement between the raters on diagnosis was 'strong' (Cohen's kappa of 0.81, 0.85 and 0.85 for face-to-face vs. telepsychiatry, observer vs. face-to-face and observer vs. telepsychiatry, respectively).Psychiatrists' and patients' satisfaction rates, and psychiatrists' perceived certainty rates, were comparably high in both face-to-face and telepsychiatry groups.

Conclusions: Telepsychiatry is a reliable and acceptable alternative to face-to-face psychiatric assessments in the emergency room setting. Implementing telepsychiatry may improve the quality and accessibility of mental health services.Key pointsTelepsychiatry and face-to-face psychiatric assessments in the emergency room setting have comparable reliability.Patients and providers report a comparable high level of satisfaction with telepsychiatry and face-to-face modalities in the emergency room setting.Providers report a comparable level of perceived certainty in their clinical decisions based on telepsychiatry and face-to-face psychiatric assessments in the emergency room setting.

在急诊室中远程精神病学和面对面精神病学评估的可靠性和可接受性比较。
目的:本研究旨在比较急诊环境中使用远程精神病学和面对面方式的精神病学访谈的可靠性和可接受性。方法:在这项前瞻性观察性可行性研究中,对2020年4月至6月期间在急诊室就诊的精神病患者(n = 38)进行了非随机不同顺序的面对面和视频会议远程精神病学访谈。访谈者和一位资深精神病学住院医师观察了两次访谈,确定了诊断、建议的处置和非自愿入院的指征。患者和精神科医生完成可接受性后评估调查。结果:根据Cohen's kappa测量,评分者对推荐的性格和非自愿入院指征的一致性从“强”到“几乎完美”(分别为0.84/0.81、0.95/0.87和0.89/0.94,分别为面对面与远程精神治疗、观察者与面对面、观察者与远程精神治疗)。评分者在诊断上的部分一致性是“强”(面对面与远程精神治疗、观察者与面对面、观察者与远程精神治疗的科恩kappa分别为0.81、0.85和0.85)。精神科医生和病人的满意率,以及精神科医生感知的确定性率,在面对面和远程精神科治疗组中都相对较高。结论:在急诊室环境中,远程精神病学是一种可靠且可接受的替代面对面精神病学评估的方法。实施远程精神病学可以提高精神卫生服务的质量和可及性。在急诊室环境中,精神病学和面对面的精神病学评估具有相当的可靠性。患者和提供者报告在急诊室环境中对远程精神病学和面对面模式的满意度相当高。提供者报告了在急诊室环境中基于远程精神病学和面对面精神病学评估的临床决策的感知确定性水平相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice provides an international forum for communication among health professionals with clinical, academic and research interests in psychiatry. The journal gives particular emphasis to papers that integrate the findings of academic research into realities of clinical practice. Focus on the practical aspects of managing and treating patients. Essential reading for the busy psychiatrist, trainee and interested physician. Includes original research papers, comprehensive review articles and short communications. Key words: Psychiatry, Neuropsychopharmacology, Mental health, Neuropsychiatry, Clinical Neurophysiology, Psychophysiology, Psychotherapy, Addiction, Schizophrenia, Depression, Bipolar Disorders and Anxiety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信