The effects of strength vs. plyometric training on sprinting kinetics in post peak height velocity (PHV) female athletes.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-23 DOI:10.1080/14763141.2021.1975811
Kaushik Talukdar, Craig Harrison, Mike R McGuigan
{"title":"The effects of strength vs. plyometric training on sprinting kinetics in post peak height velocity (PHV) female athletes.","authors":"Kaushik Talukdar, Craig Harrison, Mike R McGuigan","doi":"10.1080/14763141.2021.1975811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Speed is a crucial factor for overall athletic development. While researchers have shown strength and plyometric training to improve sprinting speed in some adult and youth populations, no studies have compared the effects of strength and plyometric training on sprinting speed in young females. Fifty-two young females were divided into three groups and trained for 7 weeks, twice a week; strength training (n = 16, age 13.36 ± 0.84), plyometric training (n = 21, age 13.38 ± 0.75) and a physical education class as a control group (n = 15, age 13.95 ± 0.54). Participants were tested for sprinting performance and horizontal force (<i>Fo)</i>, maximum velocity (<i>Vmax</i>) and maximum horizontal power (<i>Pmax</i>) metrics over 30 m distance, isometric strength and unilateral horizontal jump distance before and after the intervention. Both the strength and plyometric groups significantly improved all performance variables (p < 0.05). The strength group significantly improved 10 m split time (6.76%; Hedge's <i>g</i> = 0.65) and <i>Fo</i> (18.98%; <i>g</i> = 0.67), whereas the plyometric group significantly improved <i>Vmax</i> (4.91%; <i>g</i> = 0.50) and <i>Pmax</i> (7.91%; <i>g</i> = 0.31). The findings of this study suggest that both strength and plyometric training can improve sprinting kinetics, jumping performance and overall strength in young females.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2021.1975811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Speed is a crucial factor for overall athletic development. While researchers have shown strength and plyometric training to improve sprinting speed in some adult and youth populations, no studies have compared the effects of strength and plyometric training on sprinting speed in young females. Fifty-two young females were divided into three groups and trained for 7 weeks, twice a week; strength training (n = 16, age 13.36 ± 0.84), plyometric training (n = 21, age 13.38 ± 0.75) and a physical education class as a control group (n = 15, age 13.95 ± 0.54). Participants were tested for sprinting performance and horizontal force (Fo), maximum velocity (Vmax) and maximum horizontal power (Pmax) metrics over 30 m distance, isometric strength and unilateral horizontal jump distance before and after the intervention. Both the strength and plyometric groups significantly improved all performance variables (p < 0.05). The strength group significantly improved 10 m split time (6.76%; Hedge's g = 0.65) and Fo (18.98%; g = 0.67), whereas the plyometric group significantly improved Vmax (4.91%; g = 0.50) and Pmax (7.91%; g = 0.31). The findings of this study suggest that both strength and plyometric training can improve sprinting kinetics, jumping performance and overall strength in young females.

力量训练与负重训练对后身高峰值速度(PHV)女运动员短跑动力学的影响。
速度是运动员全面发展的关键因素。虽然研究人员已经证明力量和负重训练能提高一些成人和青少年的短跑速度,但还没有研究比较过力量和负重训练对年轻女性短跑速度的影响。研究人员将 52 名年轻女性分为三组,进行为期 7 周、每周两次的训练;力量训练组(n = 16,年龄为 13.36 ± 0.84)、负重训练组(n = 21,年龄为 13.38 ± 0.75)和体育课对照组(n = 15,年龄为 13.95 ± 0.54)。在干预前后,测试了参与者的短跑成绩、30 米距离内的水平力(Fo)、最大速度(Vmax)和最大水平力(Pmax)指标、等长力量和单侧水平跳跃距离。力量组和负重组均显著提高了所有成绩变量(p g = 0.65)和 Fo(18.98%;g = 0.67),而负重组则显著提高了 Vmax(4.91%;g = 0.50)和 Pmax(7.91%;g = 0.31)。本研究结果表明,力量和负重训练都能改善年轻女性的短跑动力学、跳跃表现和整体力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信