The balance between professional autonomy and organizational obligations in resilient management of specialized health care: A Norwegian document study.

Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.3233/JRS-210003
Anette Sleveland, Tone Hoel Lende, Håvard Søiland, Kirsten Lode, Geir Sverre Braut
{"title":"The balance between professional autonomy and organizational obligations in resilient management of specialized health care: A Norwegian document study.","authors":"Anette Sleveland,&nbsp;Tone Hoel Lende,&nbsp;Håvard Søiland,&nbsp;Kirsten Lode,&nbsp;Geir Sverre Braut","doi":"10.3233/JRS-210003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adverse events in hospitals may jeopardize the safety of patients. Failure in professional autonomy, organizational learning or in the contact between these two factors may explain the occurrence of injurious incidents in hospitals.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To study reasons for failure in contact between professional autonomy and organizational learning in resilient management of specialized health care through document analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 20 reports from the Norwegian Board of Health Supervision were evaluated by a retrospective in-depth document analysis. In the analysis of adverse events, we applied the Braut model to identify function or failure of 1. Professional autonomy, 2. Organizational learning and 3. Contact between professional autonomy and organizational learning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multivariable regression analysis showed that failure in organizational learning was the only explanatory variable for failure in contact between doctors and nurses autonomy and organizational learning. Failure in organizational learning had the strongest effect on failure in contact between doctors and nurse's autonomy and organizational learning (B = 1.69; 95% CI = 0.45 to 2.92). Failure in professional autonomy showed no significant effect on this contact.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Failure in organizational learning is associated with failure in contact between professional autonomy and organizational learning. Failure in professional autonomy did not influence this contact.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/JRS-210003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adverse events in hospitals may jeopardize the safety of patients. Failure in professional autonomy, organizational learning or in the contact between these two factors may explain the occurrence of injurious incidents in hospitals.

Objective: To study reasons for failure in contact between professional autonomy and organizational learning in resilient management of specialized health care through document analysis.

Methods: A total of 20 reports from the Norwegian Board of Health Supervision were evaluated by a retrospective in-depth document analysis. In the analysis of adverse events, we applied the Braut model to identify function or failure of 1. Professional autonomy, 2. Organizational learning and 3. Contact between professional autonomy and organizational learning.

Results: Multivariable regression analysis showed that failure in organizational learning was the only explanatory variable for failure in contact between doctors and nurses autonomy and organizational learning. Failure in organizational learning had the strongest effect on failure in contact between doctors and nurse's autonomy and organizational learning (B = 1.69; 95% CI = 0.45 to 2.92). Failure in professional autonomy showed no significant effect on this contact.

Conclusions: Failure in organizational learning is associated with failure in contact between professional autonomy and organizational learning. Failure in professional autonomy did not influence this contact.

分享
查看原文
专业卫生保健弹性管理中专业自主和组织义务之间的平衡:挪威文献研究。
背景:医院不良事件可能危及患者的生命安全。在专业自主、组织学习或两者之间的联系失败可能解释医院伤害事件的发生。目的:通过文献分析,探讨专科医疗机构弹性管理中专业自主与组织学习联系不紧密的原因。方法:采用回顾性深入文献分析方法对挪威卫生监督委员会的20份报告进行评价。在不良事件分析中,我们采用Braut模型来识别1的功能或失效。2.职业自主权;3.组织学习;专业自主与组织学习的联系。结果:多变量回归分析显示,组织学习失败是医生护士自主与组织学习联系失败的唯一解释变量。组织学习失败对医护自主与组织学习接触失败的影响最大(B = 1.69;95% CI = 0.45 ~ 2.92)。缺乏专业自主权对这种接触没有显著影响。结论:组织学习失败与专业自主与组织学习之间的联系失败有关。职业自主的失败并没有影响这种接触。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信