Colorectal cancer knowledge and perceptions among individuals below the age of 50.

Psycho-Oncology Pub Date : 2022-03-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-24 DOI:10.1002/pon.5825
Nora M Mueller, Travis Hyams, Evelyn C King-Marshall, Barbara A Curbow
{"title":"Colorectal cancer knowledge and perceptions among individuals below the age of 50.","authors":"Nora M Mueller,&nbsp;Travis Hyams,&nbsp;Evelyn C King-Marshall,&nbsp;Barbara A Curbow","doi":"10.1002/pon.5825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) rates are increasing in individuals below the age of 50 and this trend has been projected to continue for the foreseeable future. Health officials are calling for increased awareness of rising rates in affected populations to promote discussion and early detection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In May 2018, we surveyed an online purposive sample of adults below the age of 50 (N = 624). We conducted an exploratory analysis examining knowledge of current CRC screening guidelines, knowledge of available CRC screening methods, perceived risk of CRC, and perceived importance of screening for CRC by gender, race, and previous CRC screening activity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample was 56% female, averaged 36 years of age, largely identified as Caucasian (84%), married (48%), and well educated (70% with some college or a college degree). 36% correctly identified the current age of recommended CRC screening initiation. Few (8%) correctly identified all CRC screening options presented. Genetics was thought to be the most relevant determinant of CRC. African American or black participants perceived themselves to be at lower risk of CRC, while women rated the importance of screening significantly lower than men.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified a lack of CRC knowledge in individuals below the age of 50. Interventions should correct perceptions of risk of CRC and highlight the importance of screening. Complete knowledge of the range of screening options may reduce barriers to screening while a greater knowledge of modifiable risk factors of CRC can promote healthy behaviors.</p>","PeriodicalId":516935,"journal":{"name":"Psycho-Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"436-441"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) rates are increasing in individuals below the age of 50 and this trend has been projected to continue for the foreseeable future. Health officials are calling for increased awareness of rising rates in affected populations to promote discussion and early detection.

Methods: In May 2018, we surveyed an online purposive sample of adults below the age of 50 (N = 624). We conducted an exploratory analysis examining knowledge of current CRC screening guidelines, knowledge of available CRC screening methods, perceived risk of CRC, and perceived importance of screening for CRC by gender, race, and previous CRC screening activity.

Results: The sample was 56% female, averaged 36 years of age, largely identified as Caucasian (84%), married (48%), and well educated (70% with some college or a college degree). 36% correctly identified the current age of recommended CRC screening initiation. Few (8%) correctly identified all CRC screening options presented. Genetics was thought to be the most relevant determinant of CRC. African American or black participants perceived themselves to be at lower risk of CRC, while women rated the importance of screening significantly lower than men.

Conclusion: We identified a lack of CRC knowledge in individuals below the age of 50. Interventions should correct perceptions of risk of CRC and highlight the importance of screening. Complete knowledge of the range of screening options may reduce barriers to screening while a greater knowledge of modifiable risk factors of CRC can promote healthy behaviors.

50岁以下人群对结直肠癌的认识和认知
背景:在50岁以下人群中,结直肠癌(CRC)的发病率正在上升,预计在可预见的未来,这一趋势将持续下去。卫生官员呼吁提高对受感染人群发病率上升的认识,以促进讨论和早期发现。方法:2018年5月,我们对50岁以下的成年人(N = 624)进行了有目的的在线调查。我们进行了一项探索性分析,考察了当前CRC筛查指南的知识、现有CRC筛查方法的知识、CRC的感知风险,以及按性别、种族和既往CRC筛查活动进行CRC筛查的感知重要性。结果:样本中56%为女性,平均年龄36岁,大部分为白种人(84%),已婚(48%),受过良好教育(70%具有大学或大学学位)。36%的人正确识别了推荐的CRC筛查起始年龄。很少(8%)正确识别所有CRC筛查方案。遗传学被认为是结直肠癌最相关的决定因素。非裔美国人或黑人参与者认为自己患CRC的风险较低,而女性认为筛查的重要性明显低于男性。结论:我们发现年龄在50岁以下的个体缺乏CRC知识。干预措施应纠正对结直肠癌风险的认识,并强调筛查的重要性。全面了解筛查选择范围可以减少筛查障碍,而更多地了解结直肠癌可改变的风险因素可以促进健康行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信