Attitudes of optometrists in the UK and Ireland to Digital Eye Strain and approaches to assessment and management.

IF 2.4
Patrick A Moore, James S Wolffsohn, Amy L Sheppard
{"title":"Attitudes of optometrists in the UK and Ireland to Digital Eye Strain and approaches to assessment and management.","authors":"Patrick A Moore,&nbsp;James S Wolffsohn,&nbsp;Amy L Sheppard","doi":"10.1111/opo.12887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the attitudes and understanding of optometrists in the UK and Ireland towards Digital Eye Strain (DES), and to examine related practice patterns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous online questionnaire was developed, covering attitude and understanding of DES, examination of patients who may be experiencing DES and approaches to management options. The questionnaire was promoted to UK and Ireland optometrists via professional bodies and local and area optometric committees.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>406 responses were included in the analysis. Most respondents agreed that DES was an important concern for optometrists (88.9%). 91.4% reported they felt confident in discussing possible symptoms of DES and management options; this was weakly and negatively associated with number of years qualified (r<sub>s</sub>  = -0.198, p ≤ 0.001). Estimations of the proportion of patients affected by DES were lower than reports in the literature (median 25%, IQR 10%-50%). Most respondents always (60.6%) or frequently (21.9%) inquired about device usage in routine case history taking, and also asked follow-up questions, although 29.3% only asked about the presence of symptoms half the time or less. Advising on regular breaks (84.0%), lubricants (55.7%) and environment/set up (69.2%) were felt to be extremely or very important by most respondents. Advising on specialist spectacle lenses, specifically blue filtering designs, was considered extremely or very important by 34.2% and 15.2%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given the agreement that DES is a significant issue causing frequent and persistent symptoms, and practitioners reported high levels of confidence in discussing DES, patients can expect to receive advice on symptoms and management from their optometrist. Simple management strategies were felt to be most important to advise on, with more uncertainty linked to specialist spectacle lenses.</p>","PeriodicalId":520731,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)","volume":" ","pages":"1165-1175"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/12/8d/OPO-41-1165.PMC9291543.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12887","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the attitudes and understanding of optometrists in the UK and Ireland towards Digital Eye Strain (DES), and to examine related practice patterns.

Methods: An anonymous online questionnaire was developed, covering attitude and understanding of DES, examination of patients who may be experiencing DES and approaches to management options. The questionnaire was promoted to UK and Ireland optometrists via professional bodies and local and area optometric committees.

Results: 406 responses were included in the analysis. Most respondents agreed that DES was an important concern for optometrists (88.9%). 91.4% reported they felt confident in discussing possible symptoms of DES and management options; this was weakly and negatively associated with number of years qualified (rs  = -0.198, p ≤ 0.001). Estimations of the proportion of patients affected by DES were lower than reports in the literature (median 25%, IQR 10%-50%). Most respondents always (60.6%) or frequently (21.9%) inquired about device usage in routine case history taking, and also asked follow-up questions, although 29.3% only asked about the presence of symptoms half the time or less. Advising on regular breaks (84.0%), lubricants (55.7%) and environment/set up (69.2%) were felt to be extremely or very important by most respondents. Advising on specialist spectacle lenses, specifically blue filtering designs, was considered extremely or very important by 34.2% and 15.2%, respectively.

Conclusion: Given the agreement that DES is a significant issue causing frequent and persistent symptoms, and practitioners reported high levels of confidence in discussing DES, patients can expect to receive advice on symptoms and management from their optometrist. Simple management strategies were felt to be most important to advise on, with more uncertainty linked to specialist spectacle lenses.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

英国和爱尔兰验光师对数字眼疲劳的态度以及评估和管理方法。
目的:调查英国和爱尔兰验光师对数字眼疲劳(DES)的态度和理解,并研究相关的实践模式。方法:采用匿名在线调查问卷,内容包括对DES的态度和理解、可能经历DES的患者的检查以及治疗方案的方法。该问卷通过专业机构和地方及地区验光委员会推广给英国和爱尔兰验光师。结果:406份应答被纳入分析。大多数受访者认为DES是验光师关注的重要问题(88.9%)。91.4%的人表示他们有信心讨论DES的可能症状和治疗方案;这与合格年数呈弱负相关(rs = -0.198, p≤0.001)。估计受DES影响的患者比例低于文献报道(中位数为25%,IQR为10%-50%)。大多数受访者(60.6%)或经常(21.9%)在常规病历记录中询问设备使用情况,并询问随访问题,尽管29.3%的受访者仅在一半或更少的时间内询问症状的存在。大多数受访者认为定期休息(84.0%)、润滑油(55.7%)和环境/设置(69.2%)的建议极其或非常重要。分别有34.2%和15.2%的受访者认为,为专业眼镜镜片(特别是滤蓝设计)提供建议极其重要或非常重要。结论:鉴于一致认为DES是引起频繁和持续症状的重要问题,从业人员报告了对讨论DES的高度信心,患者可以期望从他们的验光师那里获得有关症状和管理的建议。简单的管理策略被认为是最重要的建议,更多的不确定性与专业眼镜镜片有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信