Supporting Remote Survey Data Analysis by Co-researchers with Learning Disabilities through Inclusive and Creative Practices and Data Science Approaches.

Dorota Chapko, Pedro Rothstein, Lizzie Emeh, Pino Frumiento, Donald Kennedy, David Mcnicholas, Ifeoma Orjiekwe, Michaela Overton, Mark Snead, Robyn Steward, Jenny Sutton, Melissa Bradshaw, Evie Jeffreys, Will Gallia, Sarah Ewans, Mark Williams, Mick Grierson
{"title":"Supporting Remote Survey Data Analysis by Co-researchers with Learning Disabilities through Inclusive and Creative Practices and Data Science Approaches.","authors":"Dorota Chapko, Pedro Rothstein, Lizzie Emeh, Pino Frumiento, Donald Kennedy, David Mcnicholas, Ifeoma Orjiekwe, Michaela Overton, Mark Snead, Robyn Steward, Jenny Sutton, Melissa Bradshaw, Evie Jeffreys, Will Gallia, Sarah Ewans, Mark Williams, Mick Grierson","doi":"10.1145/3461778.3462010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Through a process of robust co-design, we created a bespoke accessible survey platform to explore the role of co-researchers with learning disabilities (LDs) in research design and analysis. A team of co-researchers used this system to create an online survey to challenge public understanding of LDs [3]. Here, we describe and evaluate the process of remotely co-analyzing the survey data across 30 meetings in a research team consisting of academics and non-academics with diverse abilities amid new COVID-19 lockdown challenges. Based on survey data with >1,500 responses, we first co-analyzed demographics using graphs and art & design approaches. Next, co-researchers co-analyzed the output of machine learning-based structural topic modelling (STM) applied to open-ended text responses. We derived an efficient five-steps STM co-analysis process for creative, inclusive, and critical engagement of data by co-researchers. Co-researchers observed that by trying to understand and impact public opinion, their own perspectives also changed.</p>","PeriodicalId":72821,"journal":{"name":"DIS. Designing Interactive Systems (Conference)","volume":"2021 ","pages":"1668-1681"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7611679/pdf/EMS134659.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIS. Designing Interactive Systems (Conference)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Through a process of robust co-design, we created a bespoke accessible survey platform to explore the role of co-researchers with learning disabilities (LDs) in research design and analysis. A team of co-researchers used this system to create an online survey to challenge public understanding of LDs [3]. Here, we describe and evaluate the process of remotely co-analyzing the survey data across 30 meetings in a research team consisting of academics and non-academics with diverse abilities amid new COVID-19 lockdown challenges. Based on survey data with >1,500 responses, we first co-analyzed demographics using graphs and art & design approaches. Next, co-researchers co-analyzed the output of machine learning-based structural topic modelling (STM) applied to open-ended text responses. We derived an efficient five-steps STM co-analysis process for creative, inclusive, and critical engagement of data by co-researchers. Co-researchers observed that by trying to understand and impact public opinion, their own perspectives also changed.

通过包容性和创造性实践和数据科学方法支持有学习障碍的共同研究人员进行远程调查数据分析。
通过稳健的共同设计过程,我们创建了一个定制的无障碍调查平台,以探索有学习障碍(ld)的共同研究者在研究设计和分析中的作用。一组共同研究人员使用该系统创建了一项在线调查,以挑战公众对ld b[3]的理解。在这里,我们描述和评估了在新冠肺炎封锁挑战下,由不同能力的学者和非学者组成的研究小组远程共同分析30次会议调查数据的过程。基于1500个回复的调查数据,我们首先使用图表和艺术与设计方法共同分析人口统计数据。接下来,共同研究人员共同分析了应用于开放式文本响应的基于机器学习的结构主题建模(STM)的输出。我们推导了一个有效的五步STM联合分析过程,用于共同研究人员创造性、包容性和批判性地参与数据。共同研究人员观察到,通过试图理解和影响公众舆论,他们自己的观点也发生了变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书