Supporting Remote Survey Data Analysis by Co-researchers with Learning Disabilities through Inclusive and Creative Practices and Data Science Approaches.
Dorota Chapko, Pedro Rothstein, Lizzie Emeh, Pino Frumiento, Donald Kennedy, David Mcnicholas, Ifeoma Orjiekwe, Michaela Overton, Mark Snead, Robyn Steward, Jenny Sutton, Melissa Bradshaw, Evie Jeffreys, Will Gallia, Sarah Ewans, Mark Williams, Mick Grierson
{"title":"Supporting Remote Survey Data Analysis by Co-researchers with Learning Disabilities through Inclusive and Creative Practices and Data Science Approaches.","authors":"Dorota Chapko, Pedro Rothstein, Lizzie Emeh, Pino Frumiento, Donald Kennedy, David Mcnicholas, Ifeoma Orjiekwe, Michaela Overton, Mark Snead, Robyn Steward, Jenny Sutton, Melissa Bradshaw, Evie Jeffreys, Will Gallia, Sarah Ewans, Mark Williams, Mick Grierson","doi":"10.1145/3461778.3462010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Through a process of robust co-design, we created a bespoke accessible survey platform to explore the role of co-researchers with learning disabilities (LDs) in research design and analysis. A team of co-researchers used this system to create an online survey to challenge public understanding of LDs [3]. Here, we describe and evaluate the process of remotely co-analyzing the survey data across 30 meetings in a research team consisting of academics and non-academics with diverse abilities amid new COVID-19 lockdown challenges. Based on survey data with >1,500 responses, we first co-analyzed demographics using graphs and art & design approaches. Next, co-researchers co-analyzed the output of machine learning-based structural topic modelling (STM) applied to open-ended text responses. We derived an efficient five-steps STM co-analysis process for creative, inclusive, and critical engagement of data by co-researchers. Co-researchers observed that by trying to understand and impact public opinion, their own perspectives also changed.</p>","PeriodicalId":72821,"journal":{"name":"DIS. Designing Interactive Systems (Conference)","volume":"2021 ","pages":"1668-1681"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7611679/pdf/EMS134659.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIS. Designing Interactive Systems (Conference)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Through a process of robust co-design, we created a bespoke accessible survey platform to explore the role of co-researchers with learning disabilities (LDs) in research design and analysis. A team of co-researchers used this system to create an online survey to challenge public understanding of LDs [3]. Here, we describe and evaluate the process of remotely co-analyzing the survey data across 30 meetings in a research team consisting of academics and non-academics with diverse abilities amid new COVID-19 lockdown challenges. Based on survey data with >1,500 responses, we first co-analyzed demographics using graphs and art & design approaches. Next, co-researchers co-analyzed the output of machine learning-based structural topic modelling (STM) applied to open-ended text responses. We derived an efficient five-steps STM co-analysis process for creative, inclusive, and critical engagement of data by co-researchers. Co-researchers observed that by trying to understand and impact public opinion, their own perspectives also changed.