The effect of interdisciplinary and diversified health education combined with personalized nutrition intervention on FPG, 2hPG, SDS, SAS scores and the pregnancy outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Ginekologia polska Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-20 DOI:10.5603/GP.a2021.0066
Guo-Hong Zhu, Yun Xu, Li Zou, Qing Zhou, Li-Juan Zhou
{"title":"The effect of interdisciplinary and diversified health education combined with personalized nutrition intervention on FPG, 2hPG, SDS, SAS scores and the pregnancy outcomes of gestational diabetes mellitus.","authors":"Guo-Hong Zhu, Yun Xu, Li Zou, Qing Zhou, Li-Juan Zhou","doi":"10.5603/GP.a2021.0066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to explore the effect of interdisciplinary and diversified health education combined with personalized nutrition intervention on FPG, 2hPG, SDS, SAS scores and pregnancy outcome of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 180 GDM patients, who were admitted to our hospital between June 2019 and June 2020, were enrolled as the research subjects and randomly divided into two groups: a research group and a control group (n = 90, each). The patients in the control group received routine care while the patients in the research group received interdisciplinary and diversified health education combined with personalized nutrition intervention. The fasting blood-glucose (FPG), two-hour postprandial blood glucose (2hPBG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C), SDS, SAS scores, and pregnancy outcome of the two groups of pregnant women were analyzed and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The differences in the levels of FBG, 2hPBG and HbA1C between the two groups before nursing were not statistically significant. After nursing, the levels of FBG, 2hPBG, and HbA1C of the two groups of patients decreased, and the differences in each group before and after intervention were statistically significant. These indexes were lower in the research group than in the control group, the differences being statistically significant. There were no significant differences between the two groups in SAS and SDS scores before nursing, but there were statistically significant differences after nursing. The incidence of unfavorable pregnancy outcome was lower in the research group (8.89%) than in the control group (14.44%), but the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interdisciplinary and diversified health education combined with personalized nutrition intervention can effectively reduce FPG, 2hPG, SDS, and SAS scores in GDM women.</p>","PeriodicalId":12727,"journal":{"name":"Ginekologia polska","volume":" ","pages":"304-307"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ginekologia polska","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/GP.a2021.0066","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to explore the effect of interdisciplinary and diversified health education combined with personalized nutrition intervention on FPG, 2hPG, SDS, SAS scores and pregnancy outcome of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

Material and methods: A total of 180 GDM patients, who were admitted to our hospital between June 2019 and June 2020, were enrolled as the research subjects and randomly divided into two groups: a research group and a control group (n = 90, each). The patients in the control group received routine care while the patients in the research group received interdisciplinary and diversified health education combined with personalized nutrition intervention. The fasting blood-glucose (FPG), two-hour postprandial blood glucose (2hPBG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C), SDS, SAS scores, and pregnancy outcome of the two groups of pregnant women were analyzed and compared.

Results: The differences in the levels of FBG, 2hPBG and HbA1C between the two groups before nursing were not statistically significant. After nursing, the levels of FBG, 2hPBG, and HbA1C of the two groups of patients decreased, and the differences in each group before and after intervention were statistically significant. These indexes were lower in the research group than in the control group, the differences being statistically significant. There were no significant differences between the two groups in SAS and SDS scores before nursing, but there were statistically significant differences after nursing. The incidence of unfavorable pregnancy outcome was lower in the research group (8.89%) than in the control group (14.44%), but the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: Interdisciplinary and diversified health education combined with personalized nutrition intervention can effectively reduce FPG, 2hPG, SDS, and SAS scores in GDM women.

跨学科、多元化健康教育结合个性化营养干预对妊娠糖尿病患者FPG、2hPG、SDS、SAS评分及妊娠结局的影响。
研究目的本研究旨在探讨跨学科、多元化健康教育结合个性化营养干预对妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)FPG、2hPG、SDS、SAS评分及妊娠结局的影响:选取我院2019年6月至2020年6月期间收治的180例GDM患者作为研究对象,随机分为研究组和对照组两组(各90例)。对照组患者接受常规护理,研究组患者接受跨学科、多样化的健康教育,并结合个性化营养干预。对两组孕妇的空腹血糖(FPG)、餐后两小时血糖(2hPBG)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1C)、SDS、SAS评分和妊娠结局进行了分析和比较:结果:两组孕妇在哺乳前的 FBG、2hPBG 和 HbA1C 水平差异无统计学意义。护理后,两组患者的 FBG、2hPBG 和 HbA1C 水平均有所下降,干预前后各组差异均有统计学意义。研究组的这些指标均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义。两组患者在护理前的 SAS 和 SDS 评分无明显差异,但在护理后差异有统计学意义。研究组不良妊娠结局发生率(8.89%)低于对照组(14.44%),但差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05):跨学科、多元化的健康教育结合个性化的营养干预,可有效降低 GDM 妇女的 FPG、2hPG、SDS 和 SAS 评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ginekologia polska
Ginekologia polska OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
15.40%
发文量
317
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Ginekologia Polska’ is a monthly medical journal published in Polish and English language. ‘Ginekologia Polska’ will accept submissions relating to any aspect of gynaecology, obstetrics and areas directly related. ‘Ginekologia Polska’ publishes original contributions, comparative works, case studies, letters to the editor and many other categories of articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信