Medical Devices-Related Counseling Practices Among Community Pharmacists: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study from Saudi Arabia.

IF 2.1 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice Pub Date : 2021-09-10 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IPRP.S310027
Ahmed Ibrahim Fathelrahman
{"title":"Medical Devices-Related Counseling Practices Among Community Pharmacists: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study from Saudi Arabia.","authors":"Ahmed Ibrahim Fathelrahman","doi":"10.2147/IPRP.S310027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The current study was conducted to assess medical devices-related counseling practices among community pharmacists in Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This was a cross-sectional study conducted among community pharmacists from Saudi Arabia using a convenience sampling technique. An online questionnaire based on Google forms was used to collect data. Descriptive and inferential analyses were conducted using SPSS statistics 22. Student <i>t</i>-test, one way ANOVA, and Pearson correlation statistics were used where applicable. Results with a <i>p</i>-value of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One thousand and six community pharmacists responded to the survey. Males' rating of their ability to operate medical devices was significantly higher than females (overall average score of 3.8 versus 3.5, <i>p</i>=0.033). As years of experience increased there were slight but significant increases in the overall scores on ability to operate medical devices (<i>p</i>=0.002) and confidence to counsel patients about the devices (<i>p</i>=0.032). Those who got a board certification used devices for self-treatment significantly more than their counterparts (on average 6.9 devices versus 5.2, <i>p</i>=0.003). Those who received clinical training reported higher rates of ability to use/operate devices (<i>p</i>=0.011), confidence to counsel patients on devices (<i>p</i>=0.001), and counseling practice (<i>p</i>=0.044) than those who did not receive clinical training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study revealed good to very good self-reported medical devices-related counseling practices. There is a need for more future rigorous research to evaluate pharmacists' actual practice in this area. Pharmacy educators and CPD programs should pay attention to updating pharmacists' knowledge and skills and improve their contribution to medical devices supportive services.</p>","PeriodicalId":45655,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b5/34/iprp-10-113.PMC8439968.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IPRP.S310027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: The current study was conducted to assess medical devices-related counseling practices among community pharmacists in Saudi Arabia.

Methodology: This was a cross-sectional study conducted among community pharmacists from Saudi Arabia using a convenience sampling technique. An online questionnaire based on Google forms was used to collect data. Descriptive and inferential analyses were conducted using SPSS statistics 22. Student t-test, one way ANOVA, and Pearson correlation statistics were used where applicable. Results with a p-value of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results: One thousand and six community pharmacists responded to the survey. Males' rating of their ability to operate medical devices was significantly higher than females (overall average score of 3.8 versus 3.5, p=0.033). As years of experience increased there were slight but significant increases in the overall scores on ability to operate medical devices (p=0.002) and confidence to counsel patients about the devices (p=0.032). Those who got a board certification used devices for self-treatment significantly more than their counterparts (on average 6.9 devices versus 5.2, p=0.003). Those who received clinical training reported higher rates of ability to use/operate devices (p=0.011), confidence to counsel patients on devices (p=0.001), and counseling practice (p=0.044) than those who did not receive clinical training.

Conclusion: The present study revealed good to very good self-reported medical devices-related counseling practices. There is a need for more future rigorous research to evaluate pharmacists' actual practice in this area. Pharmacy educators and CPD programs should pay attention to updating pharmacists' knowledge and skills and improve their contribution to medical devices supportive services.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

社区药剂师的医疗器械相关咨询实践:一项来自沙特阿拉伯的全国性横断面研究。
目的:本研究旨在评估沙特阿拉伯社区药剂师的医疗器械相关咨询实践。方法:这是一项横断面研究,在沙特阿拉伯的社区药剂师中进行,使用方便的抽样技术。使用基于谷歌表格的在线问卷来收集数据。采用SPSS统计22进行描述性和推断性分析。适用时采用学生t检验、单因素方差分析和Pearson相关统计。结果:共有1606名社区药师参与了本次调查。男性对其操作医疗器械能力的评分明显高于女性(总体平均得分3.8比3.5,p=0.033)。随着经验年数的增加,操作医疗器械的能力(p=0.002)和向患者咨询设备的信心(p=0.032)的总体得分略有但显著增加。那些获得委员会认证的人使用器械进行自我治疗的次数明显多于同行(平均6.9个器械对5.2个器械,p=0.003)。与未接受临床培训的患者相比,接受临床培训的患者在使用/操作器械的能力(p=0.011)、对器械咨询患者的信心(p=0.001)和咨询实践(p=0.044)方面的比例更高。结论:本研究揭示了良好到非常良好的自我报告医疗器械相关咨询实践。未来需要更多严谨的研究来评估药师在这一领域的实际实践。药学教育工作者和CPD项目应该注意更新药剂师的知识和技能,提高他们对医疗器械支持服务的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
3.40%
发文量
29
审稿时长
16 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信