Development and Comparative Efficacy of Lagos Neuropathy Protocol for Improving Recovery of Symptom and Functional Independence Performance in Individuals with Diabetic Peripheral Sensorimotor Polyneuropathy.

Physical therapy research Pub Date : 2021-02-24 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1298/ptr.E10070
Caleb Ademola Omuwa Gbiri, Hammed Olaoye Iyiola, Jibrin Sammani Usman, Caleb Adewumi Adeagbo, Babatunde Lekan Ileyemi, Ngozi Florence Onuegbu, Francis-Beloved Odinakachukwu Odidika
{"title":"Development and Comparative Efficacy of Lagos Neuropathy Protocol for Improving Recovery of Symptom and Functional Independence Performance in Individuals with Diabetic Peripheral Sensorimotor Polyneuropathy.","authors":"Caleb Ademola Omuwa Gbiri,&nbsp;Hammed Olaoye Iyiola,&nbsp;Jibrin Sammani Usman,&nbsp;Caleb Adewumi Adeagbo,&nbsp;Babatunde Lekan Ileyemi,&nbsp;Ngozi Florence Onuegbu,&nbsp;Francis-Beloved Odinakachukwu Odidika","doi":"10.1298/ptr.E10070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetic peripheral sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DPSP) has been treated with sketchy outcomes and available approaches are not applicable for self-administration. This study developed protocol for managing symptoms of DPSP and assessed its comparative efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study developed <i>Lagos Neuropathy Protocol (LNP)</i> through existing concept in DPSP and tested its safety, clinical applicability, and ease of self-administration. Its efficacy was compared with <i>Buerger-Allen Exercise</i> (<i>BAE</i>) by involving 31(11males) with DPSP, randomized into <i>LNP</i> and <i>BAE</i> and treated for 10-week. Toronto Clinical Scoring System was used to diagnose DPSP while Diabetic Neuropathy Examination was used to diagnose distal polyneuropathy. Sensory/pressure perception was assessed using 10 g-monofilament while Short Physical Performance Battery, Bergs Balance Scale and Visual Analogue Scale was used to assess functional performance, strength and balance, and pain respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><i>LNP</i> has three domains: sensory/pressure/proprioception, strength/balance, and pain/swelling. Most (80%) of the participants rated the <i>LNP</i> as excellently safe while the rest (20%) rated as very good in safety. All the participants rated <i>LNP</i> excellent in terms of self-administration and suitability for clinical use without adverse effect. The mean age of the participants for the comparative phase was 66.20±9.48years while their length of diagnoses of diabetes was 15.80±13.35years. About a third (32.5%) had DPSP. Both <i>LNP</i> and <i>BAE</i> had significant improvement (p<0.05) in sensory/pressure perception, pain, strength and balance, and functional performance but <i>LNP</i> had better significant improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><i>LNP</i> is safe, good for self-administration, clinically applicable and efficacious in improving sensory/pressure perception, balance, pain and functional performances in individuals with DPSP.</p>","PeriodicalId":74445,"journal":{"name":"Physical therapy research","volume":"24 2","pages":"136-144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8419594/pdf/ptr-24-02-0136.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical therapy research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1298/ptr.E10070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diabetic peripheral sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DPSP) has been treated with sketchy outcomes and available approaches are not applicable for self-administration. This study developed protocol for managing symptoms of DPSP and assessed its comparative efficacy.

Methods: Study developed Lagos Neuropathy Protocol (LNP) through existing concept in DPSP and tested its safety, clinical applicability, and ease of self-administration. Its efficacy was compared with Buerger-Allen Exercise (BAE) by involving 31(11males) with DPSP, randomized into LNP and BAE and treated for 10-week. Toronto Clinical Scoring System was used to diagnose DPSP while Diabetic Neuropathy Examination was used to diagnose distal polyneuropathy. Sensory/pressure perception was assessed using 10 g-monofilament while Short Physical Performance Battery, Bergs Balance Scale and Visual Analogue Scale was used to assess functional performance, strength and balance, and pain respectively.

Results: LNP has three domains: sensory/pressure/proprioception, strength/balance, and pain/swelling. Most (80%) of the participants rated the LNP as excellently safe while the rest (20%) rated as very good in safety. All the participants rated LNP excellent in terms of self-administration and suitability for clinical use without adverse effect. The mean age of the participants for the comparative phase was 66.20±9.48years while their length of diagnoses of diabetes was 15.80±13.35years. About a third (32.5%) had DPSP. Both LNP and BAE had significant improvement (p<0.05) in sensory/pressure perception, pain, strength and balance, and functional performance but LNP had better significant improvement.

Conclusion: LNP is safe, good for self-administration, clinically applicable and efficacious in improving sensory/pressure perception, balance, pain and functional performances in individuals with DPSP.

拉各斯神经病方案在改善糖尿病周围感觉运动多发性神经病患者症状和功能独立表现恢复中的发展和比较疗效。
背景:糖尿病外周感觉运动性多发性神经病(DPSP)的治疗结果很粗略,现有的方法不适用于自行给药。本研究制定了DPSP症状管理方案,并评估了其比较疗效。方法:本研究通过DPSP中现有的概念开发了拉各斯神经病变方案(LNP),并测试了其安全性、临床适用性和自我给药的简易性。通过将31名(11名男性)DPSP患者随机分为LNP和BAE,并治疗10周,将其疗效与Buerger-Allen Exercise(BAE)进行比较。多伦多临床评分系统用于诊断DPSP,糖尿病神经病变检查用于诊断远端多发性神经病。使用10g单丝评估感觉/压力感知,同时使用短期物理性能量表、Bergs平衡量表和视觉模拟量表分别评估功能性能、力量和平衡以及疼痛。结果:LNP有三个领域:感觉/压力/本体感觉、力量/平衡和疼痛/肿胀。大多数(80%)的参与者认为LNP非常安全,而其余(20%)的参与者则认为其安全性非常好。所有参与者都认为LNP在自我给药和临床应用适用性方面表现出色,没有不良反应。比较阶段参与者的平均年龄为66.20±9.48岁,而他们诊断糖尿病的时间为15.80±13.35岁。大约三分之一(32.5%)患有DPSP。LNP和BAE均有显著改善(pLNP有更好的显著改善)。结论:LNP安全、易于自我给药、临床适用,对改善DPSP患者的感觉/压力感知、平衡、疼痛和功能表现有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信