Evaluation of demand and supply predictors of uptake of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in pregnancy in Malawi.

MalariaWorld journal Pub Date : 2017-12-01 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01
Emmanuel N Odjidja, Predrag Duric
{"title":"Evaluation of demand and supply predictors of uptake of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in pregnancy in Malawi.","authors":"Emmanuel N Odjidja,&nbsp;Predrag Duric","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The intermittent preventive treatment (IPTp) policy of Malawi (2002) stipulates that IPTp is administered during antenatal care as a direct observation therapy (DOT). The policy further recommends that IPT should be administered monthly after 16 weeks of pregnancy until delivery. This study assessed both the demand and supply factors contributing to higher dropout of IPT after the first dose. Optimal number of doses was pegged at a minimum of three in accordance with WHO recommendation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data were analysed from the Malawi multiple indicator cluster survey (2015) and the service provision assessment (2014) of 6637 women (aged 15- 49 yrs), 763 facilities and 2105 health workers. The sample was made up of pregnant women, health facilities and workers involved in routine antenatal services across all regions of Malawi. A composite indicator was constructed to report integration of IPTp with ANC services and administration of IPTp-SP as DOT. Multivariate and logistic regression were conducted to determine associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regression analysis found that: 1. Age of women (women 35-49 yrs, AOR 1.98; 95% CI 1.42 - 2.13, number of children as well as the number of ANC visits were associated with optimal uptake of IPTp. 2. Administering IPT as DOT was higher in facilities in rural areas (AOR 1.86; 95% CI 1.54 - 1.92) than in urban areas. 3. Administration of IPTp as DOT was relatively lower in across all facilities with highest being facilities managed by CHAM (72.8%, AOR 1.40; 95% CI 1.22 - 1.54).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Health system bottlenecks were found to present the main cause of low coverage with optimal doses of IPTp. Incorporating these results into strategic policy IPTp formulation could help improve coverage to desired levels. This study could serve as plausible evidence for government and donors when planning malaria in pregnancy interventions, especially in remote parts of Malawi.</p>","PeriodicalId":74100,"journal":{"name":"MalariaWorld journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8415061/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MalariaWorld journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The intermittent preventive treatment (IPTp) policy of Malawi (2002) stipulates that IPTp is administered during antenatal care as a direct observation therapy (DOT). The policy further recommends that IPT should be administered monthly after 16 weeks of pregnancy until delivery. This study assessed both the demand and supply factors contributing to higher dropout of IPT after the first dose. Optimal number of doses was pegged at a minimum of three in accordance with WHO recommendation.

Materials and methods: Data were analysed from the Malawi multiple indicator cluster survey (2015) and the service provision assessment (2014) of 6637 women (aged 15- 49 yrs), 763 facilities and 2105 health workers. The sample was made up of pregnant women, health facilities and workers involved in routine antenatal services across all regions of Malawi. A composite indicator was constructed to report integration of IPTp with ANC services and administration of IPTp-SP as DOT. Multivariate and logistic regression were conducted to determine associations.

Results: Regression analysis found that: 1. Age of women (women 35-49 yrs, AOR 1.98; 95% CI 1.42 - 2.13, number of children as well as the number of ANC visits were associated with optimal uptake of IPTp. 2. Administering IPT as DOT was higher in facilities in rural areas (AOR 1.86; 95% CI 1.54 - 1.92) than in urban areas. 3. Administration of IPTp as DOT was relatively lower in across all facilities with highest being facilities managed by CHAM (72.8%, AOR 1.40; 95% CI 1.22 - 1.54).

Conclusion: Health system bottlenecks were found to present the main cause of low coverage with optimal doses of IPTp. Incorporating these results into strategic policy IPTp formulation could help improve coverage to desired levels. This study could serve as plausible evidence for government and donors when planning malaria in pregnancy interventions, especially in remote parts of Malawi.

评估马拉维孕妇接受间歇性疟疾预防治疗的需求和供应预测因素。
背景:马拉维(2002)的间歇性预防治疗(IPTp)政策规定,IPTp在产前护理期间作为直接观察治疗(DOT)进行。该政策进一步建议,IPT应在怀孕16周后每月进行一次,直到分娩。本研究评估了需求和供应因素,这些因素导致首次剂量后IPT的辍学率较高。根据世卫组织的建议,确定最佳剂量至少为三剂。材料和方法:分析了马拉维多指标类集调查(2015年)和6637名妇女(15- 49岁)、763家机构和2105名卫生工作者的服务提供评估(2014年)的数据。样本由马拉维所有地区的孕妇、卫生机构和从事常规产前服务的工作人员组成。构建了一个综合指标来报告IPTp与ANC服务的集成以及IPTp- sp作为DOT的管理。进行多变量和逻辑回归来确定相关性。结果:回归分析发现:1。女性年龄(女性35-49岁,AOR 1.98;95% CI 1.42 - 2.13,儿童数量和ANC就诊次数与IPTp的最佳摄取相关。2. 将IPT作为DOT管理的农村设施较高(AOR 1.86;95%可信区间为1.54 - 1.92),高于城市地区。3.IPTp作为DOT的管理在所有设施中相对较低,最高的是由CHAM管理的设施(72.8%,AOR 1.40;95% ci 1.22 - 1.54)。结论:发现卫生系统瓶颈是IPTp最佳剂量覆盖率低的主要原因。将这些结果纳入战略政策IPTp的制定可以帮助将覆盖率提高到理想的水平。这项研究可以作为政府和捐助者在规划妊娠期疟疾干预措施时的可信证据,特别是在马拉维的偏远地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信