The association of multidimensional schizotypy with symptoms and impairment across racial groups.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Personality and Mental Health Pub Date : 2022-02-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-15 DOI:10.1002/pmh.1528
Katrina S Rbeiz, Haley E Clark, Kathryn C Kemp, Alyssa J Bathery, Mahogany A Monette, Neus Barrantes-Vidal, Thomas R Kwapil
{"title":"The association of multidimensional schizotypy with symptoms and impairment across racial groups.","authors":"Katrina S Rbeiz,&nbsp;Haley E Clark,&nbsp;Kathryn C Kemp,&nbsp;Alyssa J Bathery,&nbsp;Mahogany A Monette,&nbsp;Neus Barrantes-Vidal,&nbsp;Thomas R Kwapil","doi":"10.1002/pmh.1528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The assessment of schizotypy and schizophrenia-spectrum psychopathology has historically been adversely impacted by multiple forms of measurement bias, including racial bias. The Multidimensional Schizotypy Scale (MSS) was developed using modern scale construction methods to minimize measurement bias in the assessment of schizotypic traits. However, studies have not examined the validity of the measurement across different racial groups. The present study examined whether the associations of MSS positive, negative, and disorganized schizotypy subscales with interview-assessed ratings of functioning, schizophrenia-spectrum personality traits, and depressive disorders were generally comparable across nonclinically ascertained samples of Black (n = 46), Asian (n = 87), and White (n = 116) young adults. Consistent with previous findings, all three schizotypy subscales were associated with impairment and schizotypal and paranoid traits. Negative schizotypy was associated with schizoid traits, and disorganized schizotypy was associated with depressive disorders. These associations were comparable across the racial groups, supporting the use of the MSS in these groups. Culturally and empirically valid assessments are essential for providing accurate assessments across racial/ethnic groups and reducing the risk of overpathologizing people of color. The present findings support the cross-cultural validity of the MSS; however, future studies should expand upon these findings by including more diverse samples and longitudinal designs.</p>","PeriodicalId":46871,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Mental Health","volume":"16 1","pages":"79-89"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/pmh.1528","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1528","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The assessment of schizotypy and schizophrenia-spectrum psychopathology has historically been adversely impacted by multiple forms of measurement bias, including racial bias. The Multidimensional Schizotypy Scale (MSS) was developed using modern scale construction methods to minimize measurement bias in the assessment of schizotypic traits. However, studies have not examined the validity of the measurement across different racial groups. The present study examined whether the associations of MSS positive, negative, and disorganized schizotypy subscales with interview-assessed ratings of functioning, schizophrenia-spectrum personality traits, and depressive disorders were generally comparable across nonclinically ascertained samples of Black (n = 46), Asian (n = 87), and White (n = 116) young adults. Consistent with previous findings, all three schizotypy subscales were associated with impairment and schizotypal and paranoid traits. Negative schizotypy was associated with schizoid traits, and disorganized schizotypy was associated with depressive disorders. These associations were comparable across the racial groups, supporting the use of the MSS in these groups. Culturally and empirically valid assessments are essential for providing accurate assessments across racial/ethnic groups and reducing the risk of overpathologizing people of color. The present findings support the cross-cultural validity of the MSS; however, future studies should expand upon these findings by including more diverse samples and longitudinal designs.

跨种族群体的多维分裂型与症状和损害的关联。
精神分裂型和精神分裂症谱系精神病理学的评估历来受到多种形式的测量偏差的不利影响,包括种族偏见。多维分裂型量表(MSS)采用现代量表构建方法,在评估分裂型特征时尽量减少测量偏差。然而,研究并没有检验这种测量在不同种族群体中的有效性。本研究考察了MSS阳性、阴性和无组织分裂型亚量表与访谈评估的功能评分、精神分裂症人格特征和抑郁症之间的关联是否在非临床确定的黑人(n = 46)、亚洲人(n = 87)和白人(n = 116)年轻人中具有普遍可比性。与先前的研究结果一致,所有三个分裂型亚量表都与损伤、分裂型和偏执特征有关。阴性分裂型与分裂样特征相关,无序分裂型与抑郁症相关。这些关联在种族群体中具有可比性,支持在这些群体中使用MSS。文化上和经验上有效的评估对于提供跨种族/族裔群体的准确评估和减少过度病态化有色人种的风险至关重要。本研究结果支持MSS的跨文化有效性;然而,未来的研究应该通过包括更多样化的样本和纵向设计来扩展这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
14.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Personality and Mental Health: Multidisciplinary Studies from Personality Dysfunction to Criminal Behaviour aims to lead and shape the international field in this rapidly expanding area, uniting three distinct literatures: DSM-IV/ICD-10 defined personality disorders, psychopathy and offending behaviour. Through its multi-disciplinary and service orientated approach, Personality and Mental Health provides a peer-reviewed, authoritative resource for researchers, practitioners and policy makers working in the areas of personality and mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信