Ethnography and medicine: the utility of positivist methods in research.

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY
Anthropology & Medicine Pub Date : 2022-09-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-15 DOI:10.1080/13648470.2021.1893657
C M Hayre, S Blackman, P M W Hackett, D Muller, J Sim
{"title":"Ethnography and medicine: the utility of positivist methods in research.","authors":"C M Hayre,&nbsp;S Blackman,&nbsp;P M W Hackett,&nbsp;D Muller,&nbsp;J Sim","doi":"10.1080/13648470.2021.1893657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This commentary discusses the methodological utility of ethnography within the medical space. Whilst a general consensus affirms that ethnography aligns with qualitative approaches, as identified within the existing medical literature, here, we demonstrate how quantitative [positivist] methods can also be incorporated. This paper begins by contextualising ethnographic approaches within medical contexts by demonstrating its empirical value within the existing literature. Next, we discuss the interconnection between the practice of 'doctoring' and ethnographic research, whereby doctors themselves use forms of inductive and deductive reasoning to treat and manage patients in their everyday context. This philosophical discussion not only links to the everyday practice of medical practitioners, but also critically reflects on the role of the first author, as a diagnostic radiographer. Lastly, this paper identifies the virtues of ethnographic research for medical students and/or medical doctors whereby the combination of qualitative and quantitative methods (within an ethnographic methodology) can lead to new empirical and methodological insights, enabling the creation of alternate research strategies and evidence. This methodological strategy may be best considered amongst medical students and/or early career medical researchers, but we also anticipate it to resonate and open further discussion with experienced medical practitioners and researchers transnationally.</p>","PeriodicalId":8240,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology & Medicine","volume":"29 3","pages":"338-344"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13648470.2021.1893657","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This commentary discusses the methodological utility of ethnography within the medical space. Whilst a general consensus affirms that ethnography aligns with qualitative approaches, as identified within the existing medical literature, here, we demonstrate how quantitative [positivist] methods can also be incorporated. This paper begins by contextualising ethnographic approaches within medical contexts by demonstrating its empirical value within the existing literature. Next, we discuss the interconnection between the practice of 'doctoring' and ethnographic research, whereby doctors themselves use forms of inductive and deductive reasoning to treat and manage patients in their everyday context. This philosophical discussion not only links to the everyday practice of medical practitioners, but also critically reflects on the role of the first author, as a diagnostic radiographer. Lastly, this paper identifies the virtues of ethnographic research for medical students and/or medical doctors whereby the combination of qualitative and quantitative methods (within an ethnographic methodology) can lead to new empirical and methodological insights, enabling the creation of alternate research strategies and evidence. This methodological strategy may be best considered amongst medical students and/or early career medical researchers, but we also anticipate it to resonate and open further discussion with experienced medical practitioners and researchers transnationally.

民族志与医学:实证主义方法在研究中的应用。
这篇评论讨论了人种学在医学领域的方法论效用。虽然普遍的共识肯定民族志与定性方法一致,正如现有医学文献中所确定的那样,在这里,我们展示了定量[实证主义]方法也可以被纳入。本文首先通过在现有文献中展示其经验价值,在医学背景下对民族志方法进行语境化。接下来,我们将讨论“医疗”实践与人种学研究之间的联系,即医生自己在日常环境中使用归纳和演绎推理的形式来治疗和管理患者。这种哲学讨论不仅与医疗从业人员的日常实践有关,而且还批判性地反映了第一作者作为诊断放射技师的作用。最后,本文确定了民族志研究对医学生和/或医生的优点,即定性和定量方法的结合(在民族志方法论中)可以产生新的经验和方法见解,从而能够创建替代研究策略和证据。这种方法策略最好在医学生和/或早期职业医学研究人员中加以考虑,但我们也希望它能引起跨国经验丰富的医疗从业人员和研究人员的共鸣,并展开进一步的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信