Off-target effects of base editors: what we know and how we can reduce it.

IF 1.8 4区 生物学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Current Genetics Pub Date : 2022-02-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-13 DOI:10.1007/s00294-021-01211-1
Yana S Slesarenko, Alexander V Lavrov, Svetlana A Smirnikhina
{"title":"Off-target effects of base editors: what we know and how we can reduce it.","authors":"Yana S Slesarenko,&nbsp;Alexander V Lavrov,&nbsp;Svetlana A Smirnikhina","doi":"10.1007/s00294-021-01211-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The recently discovered CRISPR-Cas9 modification, base editors (BEs), is considered as one of the most promising tools for correcting disease-causing mutations in humans, since it allows point substitutions to be edited without generating double-stranded DNA breaks, and, therefore, with a significant decrease in non-specific activity. Until recently, this method was considered the safest, but at the same time, it is quite effective. However, recent studies of non-specific activity of BEs revealed that some of them lead to the formation of a huge number of off-targets in both DNA and RNA, occurring due to the nature of the Cas9-fused proteins used. In this review article, we have considered and combined data from numerous studies about the most commonly used and more described in detail APOBEC-based BEs and Target-AID version of CBE, as well as ABE7 and ABE8 with their basic modifications into TadA to improve BEs' specificity. In our opinion, modern advances in molecular genetics make it possible to dramatically reduce the off-target activity of base editors due to introducing mutations into the domains of deaminases or inhibition of Cas9 by anti-CRISPR proteins, which returns BEs to the leading position in genome editing technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10918,"journal":{"name":"Current Genetics","volume":" ","pages":"39-48"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00294-021-01211-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The recently discovered CRISPR-Cas9 modification, base editors (BEs), is considered as one of the most promising tools for correcting disease-causing mutations in humans, since it allows point substitutions to be edited without generating double-stranded DNA breaks, and, therefore, with a significant decrease in non-specific activity. Until recently, this method was considered the safest, but at the same time, it is quite effective. However, recent studies of non-specific activity of BEs revealed that some of them lead to the formation of a huge number of off-targets in both DNA and RNA, occurring due to the nature of the Cas9-fused proteins used. In this review article, we have considered and combined data from numerous studies about the most commonly used and more described in detail APOBEC-based BEs and Target-AID version of CBE, as well as ABE7 and ABE8 with their basic modifications into TadA to improve BEs' specificity. In our opinion, modern advances in molecular genetics make it possible to dramatically reduce the off-target activity of base editors due to introducing mutations into the domains of deaminases or inhibition of Cas9 by anti-CRISPR proteins, which returns BEs to the leading position in genome editing technologies.

碱基编辑器的脱靶效应:我们知道什么以及如何减少它。
最近发现的CRISPR-Cas9修饰,碱基编辑器(BEs),被认为是纠正人类致病突变最有前途的工具之一,因为它允许在不产生双链DNA断裂的情况下编辑点替换,因此,非特异性活性显著降低。直到最近,这种方法被认为是最安全的,但同时,它也很有效。然而,最近对BEs非特异性活性的研究表明,其中一些BEs会导致DNA和RNA中形成大量的脱靶,这是由于所使用的cas9融合蛋白的性质造成的。在这篇综述文章中,我们考虑并结合了大量关于最常用和更详细描述的基于apobecb的BEs和Target-AID版本的CBE的研究数据,以及ABE7和ABE8及其对TadA的基本修饰,以提高BEs的特异性。我们认为,现代分子遗传学的进步使得通过将突变引入脱氨酶的结构域或通过抗crispr蛋白抑制Cas9而大大降低碱基编辑器的脱靶活性成为可能,这使BEs重新回到基因组编辑技术的领先地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Genetics
Current Genetics 生物-遗传学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Genetics publishes genetic, genomic, molecular and systems-level analysis of eukaryotic and prokaryotic microorganisms and cell organelles. All articles are peer-reviewed. The journal welcomes submissions employing any type of research approach, be it analytical (aiming at a better understanding), applied (aiming at practical applications), synthetic or theoretical. Current Genetics no longer accepts manuscripts describing the genome sequence of mitochondria/chloroplast of a small number of species. Manuscripts covering sequence comparisons and analyses that include a large number of species will still be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信