Clinically Suspected and Biopsy-Proven Myocarditis Temporally Associated with SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

IF 15.1 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Annual review of medicine Pub Date : 2022-01-27 Epub Date: 2021-09-10 DOI:10.1146/annurev-med-042220-023859
Alida L P Caforio, Anna Baritussio, Cristina Basso, Renzo Marcolongo
{"title":"Clinically Suspected and Biopsy-Proven Myocarditis Temporally Associated with SARS-CoV-2 Infection.","authors":"Alida L P Caforio,&nbsp;Anna Baritussio,&nbsp;Cristina Basso,&nbsp;Renzo Marcolongo","doi":"10.1146/annurev-med-042220-023859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We review current data on clinically suspected [European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2013 criteria] and biopsy-proven [ESC and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria] myocarditis that is temporally associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. ESC/WHO etiological diagnosis of viral myocarditis is based on histological and immunohistological evidence of nonischemic myocyte necrosis and monolymphocytic infiltration, i.e., myocarditis, plus the identification of a specific cardiotropic virus by molecular techniques, in particular polymerase chain reaction (PCR)/in-situ hybridization, on endomyocardial biopsy (EMB)/autopsy tissue. There is not yet definitive EMB/autopsy proof that SARS-CoV-2 causes direct cardiomyocyte damage in association with histological myocarditis. Clinical epidemiology data suggest that myocarditis is uncommon for both SARS-CoV-2-positive and -negative PCR cases. We hypothesize that the rare virus-negative biopsy-proven cases may represent new-onset immune-mediated or latent pre-existing autoimmune forms,triggered or fostered by the hyperinflammatory state of severe COVID-19. We recommend the application of the ESC/WHO definitions and diagnostic criteria in future reports to avoid low-quality scientific information leading to an inaccurate estimate of myocarditis incidence based on misdiagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":8056,"journal":{"name":"Annual review of medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":15.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual review of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-med-042220-023859","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

We review current data on clinically suspected [European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2013 criteria] and biopsy-proven [ESC and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria] myocarditis that is temporally associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. ESC/WHO etiological diagnosis of viral myocarditis is based on histological and immunohistological evidence of nonischemic myocyte necrosis and monolymphocytic infiltration, i.e., myocarditis, plus the identification of a specific cardiotropic virus by molecular techniques, in particular polymerase chain reaction (PCR)/in-situ hybridization, on endomyocardial biopsy (EMB)/autopsy tissue. There is not yet definitive EMB/autopsy proof that SARS-CoV-2 causes direct cardiomyocyte damage in association with histological myocarditis. Clinical epidemiology data suggest that myocarditis is uncommon for both SARS-CoV-2-positive and -negative PCR cases. We hypothesize that the rare virus-negative biopsy-proven cases may represent new-onset immune-mediated or latent pre-existing autoimmune forms,triggered or fostered by the hyperinflammatory state of severe COVID-19. We recommend the application of the ESC/WHO definitions and diagnostic criteria in future reports to avoid low-quality scientific information leading to an inaccurate estimate of myocarditis incidence based on misdiagnosis.

临床怀疑和活检证实与SARS-CoV-2感染有关的心肌炎。
我们回顾了目前临床疑似[欧洲心脏病学会(ESC) 2013年标准]和活检证实[ESC和世界卫生组织(WHO)标准]与严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)感染暂时相关的心肌炎的数据。ESC/WHO对病毒性心肌炎的病因诊断是基于非缺血性心肌细胞坏死和单核细胞浸润的组织学和免疫组织学证据,即心肌炎,加上通过分子技术,特别是聚合酶链反应(PCR)/原位杂交,在心肌膜活检(EMB)/尸检组织上鉴定特定的嗜心病毒。目前还没有明确的EMB/尸检证据表明SARS-CoV-2导致与组织学心肌炎相关的直接心肌细胞损伤。临床流行病学资料显示,sars - cov -2阳性和PCR阴性病例均不常见心肌炎。我们假设罕见的病毒阴性活检病例可能代表新发免疫介导或潜在的预先存在的自身免疫性形式,由严重的COVID-19高炎症状态触发或促进。我们建议在未来的报告中应用ESC/WHO的定义和诊断标准,以避免低质量的科学信息导致基于误诊的心肌炎发病率的不准确估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annual review of medicine
Annual review of medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
24.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The Annual Review of Medicine, which has been published since 1950, focuses on important advancements in diverse areas of medicine. These include AIDS/HIV, cardiology, clinical pharmacology, dermatology, endocrinology/metabolism, gastroenterology, genetics, immunology, infectious disease, neurology, oncology/hematology, pediatrics, psychiatry, pulmonology, reproductive medicine, and surgery. The journal's current volume has transitioned from a gated access model to an open access model through the Annual Reviews' Subscribe to Open program. All articles published in the journal are now available under a CC BY license.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信