Treatment of In-Stent Stenosis Following Flow Diversion of Intracranial Aneurysms with Cilostazol and Clopidogrel.

IF 1.2 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurointervention Pub Date : 2021-11-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-10 DOI:10.5469/neuroint.2021.00290
Ehsan Dowlati, Kory B Dylan Pasko, Jiaqi Liu, Charles A Miller, Daniel R Felbaum, Samir Sur, Jason J Chang, Ai-Hsi Liu, Rocco A Armonda, Jeffrey C Mai
{"title":"Treatment of In-Stent Stenosis Following Flow Diversion of Intracranial Aneurysms with Cilostazol and Clopidogrel.","authors":"Ehsan Dowlati,&nbsp;Kory B Dylan Pasko,&nbsp;Jiaqi Liu,&nbsp;Charles A Miller,&nbsp;Daniel R Felbaum,&nbsp;Samir Sur,&nbsp;Jason J Chang,&nbsp;Ai-Hsi Liu,&nbsp;Rocco A Armonda,&nbsp;Jeffrey C Mai","doi":"10.5469/neuroint.2021.00290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In-stent stenosis is a feared complication of flow diversion treatment for cerebral aneurysms. We present 2 cases of patients treated with pipeline flow diversion for unruptured cerebral aneurysms. Initial perioperative dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) consisted of standard aspirin plus clopidogrel. At 6-month follow-up cerebral angiography, the patients were noted to have developed significant in-stent stenosis (63% and 53%). The patients were treated with cilostazol and clopidogrel for at least 6 months. Subsequent angiography at 1-year post-treatment showed significant improvement of the in-stent stenosis from 63% to 34% and 53% to 21%. The role of cilostazol as treatment of intracranial in-stent stenosis has not been previously described. Cilostazol's vasodilatory effect and suppression of vascular smooth muscle proliferation provides ideal benefits in this setting. Cilostazol plus clopidogrel may be a safe and effective alternative to standard DAPT for treatment of in-stent stenosis following flow diversion and warrants further consideration and investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19140,"journal":{"name":"Neurointervention","volume":"16 3","pages":"285-292"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e9/77/neuroint-2021-00290.PMC8561031.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurointervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5469/neuroint.2021.00290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In-stent stenosis is a feared complication of flow diversion treatment for cerebral aneurysms. We present 2 cases of patients treated with pipeline flow diversion for unruptured cerebral aneurysms. Initial perioperative dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) consisted of standard aspirin plus clopidogrel. At 6-month follow-up cerebral angiography, the patients were noted to have developed significant in-stent stenosis (63% and 53%). The patients were treated with cilostazol and clopidogrel for at least 6 months. Subsequent angiography at 1-year post-treatment showed significant improvement of the in-stent stenosis from 63% to 34% and 53% to 21%. The role of cilostazol as treatment of intracranial in-stent stenosis has not been previously described. Cilostazol's vasodilatory effect and suppression of vascular smooth muscle proliferation provides ideal benefits in this setting. Cilostazol plus clopidogrel may be a safe and effective alternative to standard DAPT for treatment of in-stent stenosis following flow diversion and warrants further consideration and investigation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

西洛他唑与氯吡格雷联合治疗颅内动脉瘤分流后支架内狭窄。
支架内狭窄是脑动脉瘤分流治疗中一种令人恐惧的并发症。我们报告2例采用管道分流术治疗未破裂的脑动脉瘤。初始围手术期双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)由标准阿司匹林加氯吡格雷组成。在6个月的脑血管造影随访中,发现患者出现明显的支架内狭窄(63%和53%)。患者接受西洛他唑和氯吡格雷治疗至少6个月。治疗后1年的血管造影显示支架内狭窄从63%改善到34%,从53%改善到21%。西洛他唑治疗颅内支架内狭窄的作用以前没有被描述过。西洛他唑的血管舒张作用和抑制血管平滑肌增殖在这种情况下提供了理想的益处。西洛他唑加氯吡格雷可能是一种安全有效的替代标准DAPT治疗支架内血流转移后狭窄的方法,值得进一步考虑和研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信