Should a pooled analysis of FDA trials be considered representative for a population?

Piotr Kanclerz, Jordan Masters
{"title":"Should a pooled analysis of FDA trials be considered representative for a population?","authors":"Piotr Kanclerz, Jordan Masters","doi":"10.1111/opo.12884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To the Editor: We have read with interest the article by Wu et al., in which the authors have compared the risk of bestcorrected vision acuity (BCVA) loss associated with contact lens wear and laserassisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). The pooled analysis revealed that the risk of a ≥2 line BCVA loss following LASIK was equivalent to the risk of daily contact lens wear for 103 (95% CI: 103– 391) years. While it is useful to compare outcomes of LASIK to that of contact lenses, suggesting such a chasm between visual outcomes is inappropriate given the limitations of this study. To evaluate the total risk of BCVA loss following LASIK, the authors have identified randomised clinical trials published within the FDA database from 2003 to 2019. In our opinion, the pooled results of these investigations cannot be considered as representative for the population of patients undergoing LASIK. Several of these FDA studies have been conducted in patients with hyperopia; within the analyzed data, at least 36.7% of eyes (1,792 out of 4,882) were hyperopic. Importantly, the percentage of eyes with a loss of two or more BCVA lines is significantly higher in eyes treated for hyperopia than in those treated for myopia. In clinical practice, hyperopes might constitute only up to 20% of patients undergoing LASIK. In some particular groups e.g., in US Navy personnel undergoing LASIK, the proportion of hyperopes might be even lower; in the PROWL1 Study 10 out of 508 eyes (1.9%) undergoing LASIK were hyperopic, as were 14 out of 620 eyes (2.2%) in the PROWL2 Study. Moreover, microbial keratitis (MK) related to contact lens use is a more severe condition than corneal aberrations after hyperopic LASIK, while both might lead to a ≥2 line BCVA loss. It is also useful to note that the pooled studies used from the FDA database have less than 5,000 participants. Several significantly larger studies demonstrated a significantly lower risk of BCVA loss after LASIK. 7","PeriodicalId":520731,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)","volume":" ","pages":"1385-1386"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/opo.12884","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To the Editor: We have read with interest the article by Wu et al., in which the authors have compared the risk of bestcorrected vision acuity (BCVA) loss associated with contact lens wear and laserassisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). The pooled analysis revealed that the risk of a ≥2 line BCVA loss following LASIK was equivalent to the risk of daily contact lens wear for 103 (95% CI: 103– 391) years. While it is useful to compare outcomes of LASIK to that of contact lenses, suggesting such a chasm between visual outcomes is inappropriate given the limitations of this study. To evaluate the total risk of BCVA loss following LASIK, the authors have identified randomised clinical trials published within the FDA database from 2003 to 2019. In our opinion, the pooled results of these investigations cannot be considered as representative for the population of patients undergoing LASIK. Several of these FDA studies have been conducted in patients with hyperopia; within the analyzed data, at least 36.7% of eyes (1,792 out of 4,882) were hyperopic. Importantly, the percentage of eyes with a loss of two or more BCVA lines is significantly higher in eyes treated for hyperopia than in those treated for myopia. In clinical practice, hyperopes might constitute only up to 20% of patients undergoing LASIK. In some particular groups e.g., in US Navy personnel undergoing LASIK, the proportion of hyperopes might be even lower; in the PROWL1 Study 10 out of 508 eyes (1.9%) undergoing LASIK were hyperopic, as were 14 out of 620 eyes (2.2%) in the PROWL2 Study. Moreover, microbial keratitis (MK) related to contact lens use is a more severe condition than corneal aberrations after hyperopic LASIK, while both might lead to a ≥2 line BCVA loss. It is also useful to note that the pooled studies used from the FDA database have less than 5,000 participants. Several significantly larger studies demonstrated a significantly lower risk of BCVA loss after LASIK. 7
FDA试验的汇总分析是否应该被认为具有代表性?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信