Controversial Issues Regarding Positive Bone Margins in Surgery for Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: A Pilot Study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Javier Aragón-Sánchez, Gerardo Víquez-Molina, María Eugenia López-Valverde
{"title":"Controversial Issues Regarding Positive Bone Margins in Surgery for Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Javier Aragón-Sánchez, Gerardo Víquez-Molina, María Eugenia López-Valverde","doi":"10.1177/15347346211041267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Obtaining clean margins in patients who undergo surgical treatment for diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) is recommended. We hypothesize that the rate of recurrence of the infection is not associated with positive margins, even when using a short-term duration of postoperative antibiotic treatment. We conducted a retrospective pilot study of patients who underwent surgery for DFO confirmed by histopathological analysis of the resected bone from August 1, 2020, to December 1, 2020. Bone samples were taken from the proximal margins to be studied by microbiology and histopathology. Twenty-five (89.3%) patients underwent conservative surgery, and 3 (10.7%) patients underwent a minor amputation. After surgery, the antibiotics were stopped in 19 (67.9%) patients and continued in 9 (32.1%) patients for a median period of 4 days. The microbiology of the bone margins was positive in 20 (71.4%) cases, but the histopathology of the bone margins was positive in just 7 (25%) cases. Recurrence of the infection was detected in 3 (10.7%) patients. Seventeen (68%) patients with microbiological-positive margins did not have a recurrence of infection, while 3 (100%) patients had a recurrence of infection (<i>P</i> = .53). Six (24%) patients among those with histopathological-positive margins did not have a recurrence of infection, and1 (33.3%) patient had a recurrence of infection (<i>P</i> = 1). The recurrence of infection was low and always detected in soft tissues, including the cases with a histopathological-positive bone margin. Postoperative antibiotics were administered for a short period of time and not based on the analysis of bone margins.</p>","PeriodicalId":49181,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds","volume":" ","pages":"109-115"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346211041267","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Obtaining clean margins in patients who undergo surgical treatment for diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) is recommended. We hypothesize that the rate of recurrence of the infection is not associated with positive margins, even when using a short-term duration of postoperative antibiotic treatment. We conducted a retrospective pilot study of patients who underwent surgery for DFO confirmed by histopathological analysis of the resected bone from August 1, 2020, to December 1, 2020. Bone samples were taken from the proximal margins to be studied by microbiology and histopathology. Twenty-five (89.3%) patients underwent conservative surgery, and 3 (10.7%) patients underwent a minor amputation. After surgery, the antibiotics were stopped in 19 (67.9%) patients and continued in 9 (32.1%) patients for a median period of 4 days. The microbiology of the bone margins was positive in 20 (71.4%) cases, but the histopathology of the bone margins was positive in just 7 (25%) cases. Recurrence of the infection was detected in 3 (10.7%) patients. Seventeen (68%) patients with microbiological-positive margins did not have a recurrence of infection, while 3 (100%) patients had a recurrence of infection (P = .53). Six (24%) patients among those with histopathological-positive margins did not have a recurrence of infection, and1 (33.3%) patient had a recurrence of infection (P = 1). The recurrence of infection was low and always detected in soft tissues, including the cases with a histopathological-positive bone margin. Postoperative antibiotics were administered for a short period of time and not based on the analysis of bone margins.

糖尿病足骨髓炎手术中有关阳性骨缘的争议问题:一项试点研究。
建议接受糖尿病足骨髓炎(DFO)手术治疗的患者确保边缘清洁。我们假设,即使术后使用短期抗生素治疗,感染复发率也与边缘阳性无关。我们对 2020 年 8 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 1 日期间因 DFO 接受手术并经切除骨骼组织病理学分析确认的患者进行了一项回顾性试验研究。研究人员从患者近端边缘采集骨样本,通过微生物学和组织病理学进行研究。25例(89.3%)患者接受了保守手术,3例(10.7%)患者接受了轻微截肢手术。手术后,19 名患者(67.9%)停止使用抗生素,9 名患者(32.1%)继续使用抗生素,中位时间为 4 天。有 20 例(71.4%)患者的骨边缘微生物学检查结果呈阳性,但只有 7 例(25%)患者的骨边缘组织病理学检查结果呈阳性。3例(10.7%)患者感染复发。17例(68%)边缘微生物学呈阳性的患者感染未复发,3例(100%)患者感染复发(P = .53)。在组织病理学边缘阳性的患者中,6 名(24%)患者没有感染复发,1 名(33.3%)患者感染复发(P = 1)。感染复发率很低,而且总是在软组织中发现,包括组织病理学骨边缘阳性的病例。术后使用抗生素的时间很短,而且不是基于骨边缘的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
17.60%
发文量
95
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds (IJLEW) is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, reviews of evidence-based diagnostic techniques and methods, disease and patient management, and surgical and medical therapeutics for lower extremity wounds such as burns, stomas, ulcers, fistulas, and traumatic wounds. IJLEW also offers evaluations of assessment and monitoring tools, dressings, gels, cleansers, pressure management, footwear/orthotics, casting, and bioengineered skin. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信