Diagnostic Value of DCE-MRI for Differentiating Malignant Adnexal Masses Compared with Contrast-enhanced-T1WI.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2021-09-03 DOI:10.2463/mrms.mp.2021-0003
Satoshi Otani, Aki Kido, Yuki Himoto, Akihiko Sakata, Tomoaki Otani, Ryo Kuwahara, Yusaku Moribata, Naoko Nishio, Ryo Yajima, Kyoko Nakao, Yasuhisa Kurata, Sachiko Minamiguchi, Masaki Mandai, Yuji Nakamoto
{"title":"Diagnostic Value of DCE-MRI for Differentiating Malignant Adnexal Masses Compared with Contrast-enhanced-T1WI.","authors":"Satoshi Otani,&nbsp;Aki Kido,&nbsp;Yuki Himoto,&nbsp;Akihiko Sakata,&nbsp;Tomoaki Otani,&nbsp;Ryo Kuwahara,&nbsp;Yusaku Moribata,&nbsp;Naoko Nishio,&nbsp;Ryo Yajima,&nbsp;Kyoko Nakao,&nbsp;Yasuhisa Kurata,&nbsp;Sachiko Minamiguchi,&nbsp;Masaki Mandai,&nbsp;Yuji Nakamoto","doi":"10.2463/mrms.mp.2021-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the diagnostic performance of dynamic contrast-enhanced-MR (DCE-MR) and delayed contrast-enhanced (CE)-MRI added to unenhanced MRI, including diffusion weighted image (DWI) for differentiating malignant adnexal tumors, conducting a retrospective blinded image interpretation study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data of 80 patients suspected of having adnexal tumors by ultrasonography between April 2008 and August 2018 were used for the study. All patients had undergone preoperative MRI and surgical resection at our institution. Four radiologists (two specialized in gynecological radiology and two non-specialized) were enrolled for blinded review of the MR images. A 3-point scale was used: 0 = benign, 1 = indeterminate, and 2 = malignant. Three imaging sets were reviewed: Set A, unenhanced MRI including DWI; Set B, Set A and delayed CE-T1WI; and Set C, Set A and DCE-MRI. Imaging criteria for benign and malignant tumors were given in earlier reports. The diagnostic performance of the three imaging sets of the four readers was calculated. Their areas under the curve (AUCs) were compared using the DeLong method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Accuracies of Set B were 81%-88%. Those of Set C were 81%-85%. The AUCs of Set B were 0.83 and 0.89. Those of Set C were 0.81-0.86. For two readers, Set A showed lower accuracy and AUC than Set B/Set C (less than 0.80), although those were equivalent in other readers. No significant difference in AUCs was found among the three sequence sets. Intrareader agreement was moderate to almost perfect in Sets A and B, and substantial to almost perfect in Set C.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DCE-MR showed no superiority for differentiating malignant adnexal tumors from benign tumors compared to delayed CE-T1WI with conventional MR and DWI.</p>","PeriodicalId":18119,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a1/8d/mrms-21-599.PMC9618924.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2021-0003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the diagnostic performance of dynamic contrast-enhanced-MR (DCE-MR) and delayed contrast-enhanced (CE)-MRI added to unenhanced MRI, including diffusion weighted image (DWI) for differentiating malignant adnexal tumors, conducting a retrospective blinded image interpretation study.

Methods: Data of 80 patients suspected of having adnexal tumors by ultrasonography between April 2008 and August 2018 were used for the study. All patients had undergone preoperative MRI and surgical resection at our institution. Four radiologists (two specialized in gynecological radiology and two non-specialized) were enrolled for blinded review of the MR images. A 3-point scale was used: 0 = benign, 1 = indeterminate, and 2 = malignant. Three imaging sets were reviewed: Set A, unenhanced MRI including DWI; Set B, Set A and delayed CE-T1WI; and Set C, Set A and DCE-MRI. Imaging criteria for benign and malignant tumors were given in earlier reports. The diagnostic performance of the three imaging sets of the four readers was calculated. Their areas under the curve (AUCs) were compared using the DeLong method.

Results: Accuracies of Set B were 81%-88%. Those of Set C were 81%-85%. The AUCs of Set B were 0.83 and 0.89. Those of Set C were 0.81-0.86. For two readers, Set A showed lower accuracy and AUC than Set B/Set C (less than 0.80), although those were equivalent in other readers. No significant difference in AUCs was found among the three sequence sets. Intrareader agreement was moderate to almost perfect in Sets A and B, and substantial to almost perfect in Set C.

Conclusion: DCE-MR showed no superiority for differentiating malignant adnexal tumors from benign tumors compared to delayed CE-T1WI with conventional MR and DWI.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

DCE-MRI与t1wi鉴别附件恶性肿块的诊断价值。
目的:比较动态对比增强mr (DCE-MR)和延迟对比增强MRI (CE -MRI)在未增强MRI(包括弥散加权像(DWI))基础上对附件恶性肿瘤的诊断价值,进行回顾性盲法图像解读研究。方法:选取2008年4月至2018年8月80例经超声检查疑似附件肿瘤患者的资料进行研究。所有患者术前均行MRI和手术切除。四名放射科医生(两名妇科放射科专家和两名非专业医生)被招募对MR图像进行盲法评价。采用3分制:0 =良性,1 =不确定,2 =恶性。回顾三组影像:A组,未增强MRI包括DWI;B组、A组和延迟CE-T1WI;C组、A组和DCE-MRI。良性和恶性肿瘤的影像学标准在早期的报道中给出。计算4台读卡器的3组成像的诊断性能。采用DeLong法比较其曲线下面积(auc)。结果:B组的准确率为81% ~ 88%。C组为81% ~ 85%。B组的auc分别为0.83和0.89。C组为0.81 ~ 0.86。对于两个阅读器,集合A的准确度和AUC低于集合B/集合C(小于0.80),尽管其他阅读器的准确度和AUC相同。三个序列集的auc无显著差异。在A组和B组中,阅读器内一致性中等至几乎完全,在c组中一致性相当至几乎完全。结论:与延迟CE-T1WI与常规MR和DWI相比,DCE-MR在鉴别附件恶性肿瘤与良性肿瘤方面没有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences
Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences (MRMS or Magn Reson Med Sci) is an international journal pursuing the publication of original articles contributing to the progress of magnetic resonance in the field of biomedical sciences including technical developments and clinical applications. MRMS is an official journal of the Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (JSMRM).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信