A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Safety of Hydroxychloroquine in a Randomized Controlled Trial and Observational Studies.

IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Mahanjit Konwar, Miteshkumar Maurya, Urmila M Thatte, Nithya J Gogtay, Debdipta Bose
{"title":"A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Safety of Hydroxychloroquine in a Randomized Controlled Trial and Observational Studies.","authors":"Mahanjit Konwar,&nbsp;Miteshkumar Maurya,&nbsp;Urmila M Thatte,&nbsp;Nithya J Gogtay,&nbsp;Debdipta Bose","doi":"10.2174/1574884716666210726104424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has recently become the focus of attention in the current COVID-19 pandemic. With an increase in the off-label use of HCQ, concern for the safety of HCQ has been raised. We, therefore, performed this systematic review to analyze the safety data of HCQ against placebo and active treatment in various disease conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) and Observational Studies (OSs) that evaluated HCQ for the treatment of any disease other than COVID19 in adult patients up to May 2020. We assessed the quality of the included studies using Risk of Bias 2 (for RCTs) and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (for OSs). Data were analyzed with randomeffect meta-analysis. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed to identify heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6641 studies were screened, and 49 studies (40 RCTs and 9 OSs) with a total sample size of 35044 patients were included. The use of HCQ was associated with higher risks of TDAEs as compared to placebo/no active treatment [RR 1.47, 95%CI 1.03-2.08]. When HCQ was compared with active treatments, the risks of AEs [RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.63-0.86] and TDAEs were less in the HCQ arm [RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.39-0.81]. The outcomes did not differ in the sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggest that the use of HCQ was associated with a lower risk of AEs and TDAEs as compared to active treatment, whereas posing higher risk of TDAEs as compared to placebo.</p>","PeriodicalId":29871,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Reviews in Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1574884716666210726104424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has recently become the focus of attention in the current COVID-19 pandemic. With an increase in the off-label use of HCQ, concern for the safety of HCQ has been raised. We, therefore, performed this systematic review to analyze the safety data of HCQ against placebo and active treatment in various disease conditions.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) and Observational Studies (OSs) that evaluated HCQ for the treatment of any disease other than COVID19 in adult patients up to May 2020. We assessed the quality of the included studies using Risk of Bias 2 (for RCTs) and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (for OSs). Data were analyzed with randomeffect meta-analysis. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed to identify heterogeneity.

Results: A total of 6641 studies were screened, and 49 studies (40 RCTs and 9 OSs) with a total sample size of 35044 patients were included. The use of HCQ was associated with higher risks of TDAEs as compared to placebo/no active treatment [RR 1.47, 95%CI 1.03-2.08]. When HCQ was compared with active treatments, the risks of AEs [RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.63-0.86] and TDAEs were less in the HCQ arm [RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.39-0.81]. The outcomes did not differ in the sensitivity analysis.

Conclusion: The results suggest that the use of HCQ was associated with a lower risk of AEs and TDAEs as compared to active treatment, whereas posing higher risk of TDAEs as compared to placebo.

一项随机对照试验和观察性研究中羟氯喹安全性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
简介:羟氯喹(Hydroxychloroquine, HCQ)最近成为当前COVID-19大流行关注的焦点。随着标签外使用HCQ的增加,人们对HCQ安全性的关注已经提高。因此,我们进行了这项系统综述,分析了HCQ在各种疾病条件下对安慰剂和积极治疗的安全性数据。方法:我们检索了PubMed、Embase和Cochrane,检索了截至2020年5月评估HCQ治疗成人患者除covid - 19以外任何疾病的随机对照试验(rct)和观察性研究(os)。我们使用2级偏倚风险(rct)和纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(os)评估纳入研究的质量。数据采用随机效应荟萃分析。进行敏感性和亚组分析以确定异质性。结果:共筛选6641项研究,纳入49项研究(40项rct和9项os),总样本量为35044例患者。与安慰剂或无积极治疗相比,HCQ的使用与TDAEs的高风险相关[RR 1.47, 95%CI 1.03-2.08]。与积极治疗组比较,HCQ组ae [RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.63-0.86]和tdae的风险较低[RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.39-0.81]。敏感性分析的结果没有差异。结论:结果表明,与积极治疗相比,使用HCQ与较低的ae和TDAEs风险相关,而与安慰剂相比,使用HCQ与较高的TDAEs风险相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
55
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信