Evaluation of 3D-printer settings for producing personal protective equipment.

Journal of 3D printing in medicine Pub Date : 2021-07-01 Epub Date: 2021-08-20 DOI:10.2217/3dp-2021-0005
Carson Studders, Ian Fraser, Joshua W Giles, Stephanie M Willerth
{"title":"Evaluation of 3D-printer settings for producing personal protective equipment.","authors":"Carson Studders,&nbsp;Ian Fraser,&nbsp;Joshua W Giles,&nbsp;Stephanie M Willerth","doi":"10.2217/3dp-2021-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> COVID-19 resulted in a shortage of personal protective equipment. Community members united to 3D-print face shield headbands to support local healthcare workers. This study examined factors altering print time and strength. <b>Materials & methods:</b> Combinations of infill density (50%, 100%), shell thickness (0.8, 1.2 mm), line width (0.2 mm, 0.4 mm), and layer height (0.1 mm, 0.2 mm) were evaluated through tensile testing, finite element analysis, and printing time. <b>Results:</b> Strength increased with increased infill (p < 0.001) and shell thickness (p < 0.001). Layer height had no effect on strength. Increasing line width increased strength (p < 0.001). <b>Discussion:</b> Increasing layer height and line width decreased print time by 50 and 39%, respectively. Increased shell thickness did not alter print time. These changes are recommended for printing.</p>","PeriodicalId":73578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of 3D printing in medicine","volume":"5 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8384239/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of 3D printing in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/3dp-2021-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: COVID-19 resulted in a shortage of personal protective equipment. Community members united to 3D-print face shield headbands to support local healthcare workers. This study examined factors altering print time and strength. Materials & methods: Combinations of infill density (50%, 100%), shell thickness (0.8, 1.2 mm), line width (0.2 mm, 0.4 mm), and layer height (0.1 mm, 0.2 mm) were evaluated through tensile testing, finite element analysis, and printing time. Results: Strength increased with increased infill (p < 0.001) and shell thickness (p < 0.001). Layer height had no effect on strength. Increasing line width increased strength (p < 0.001). Discussion: Increasing layer height and line width decreased print time by 50 and 39%, respectively. Increased shell thickness did not alter print time. These changes are recommended for printing.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

评估用于生产个人防护装备的3d打印机设置。
目的:新冠肺炎疫情导致个人防护装备短缺。社区成员联合使用3d打印面罩发带来支持当地医护人员。本研究考察了影响打印时间和强度的因素。材料和方法:通过拉伸测试、有限元分析和打印时间来评估填充密度(50%、100%)、外壳厚度(0.8、1.2 mm)、线宽(0.2 mm、0.4 mm)和层高(0.1 mm、0.2 mm)的组合。结果:强度随填充量的增加而增加(p)讨论:增加层高和线宽分别减少打印时间50%和39%。增加的外壳厚度不会改变打印时间。建议对打印进行这些更改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信